Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

High Infection Rates for Adult Macaques after Intravaginal or Intrarectal Inoculation with Zika Virus

Andrew D. HaddowComments to Author , Aysegul Nalca, Franco D. Rossi, Lynn J. Miller, Michael R. Wiley, Unai Perez-Sautu, Samuel C. Washington, Sarah L. Norris, Suzanne E. Wollen-Roberts, Joshua D. Shamblin, Adrienne E. Kimmel, Holly A. Bloomfield, Stephanie M. Valdez, Thomas R. Sprague, Lucia M. Principe, Stephanie A. Bellanca, Stephanie S. Cinkovich, Luis Lugo-Roman, Lisa H. Cazares, William D. Pratt, Gustavo Palacios, Sina Bavari, M. Louise Pitt, and Farooq Nasar
Author affiliations: United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Serologic responses of 8 rhesus and cynomolgus macaques after intrarectal inoculation of Zika virus*

Macaque Sex Serologic response, PRNT80, by DPI
7 15 21 28
Rhesus 5 M 1:1,280 1:1,280 1:1,280
Rhesus 6 F 1:320 1:640 1:1,280
Rhesus 7 M 1:1,280 1:1,280 1:1,280
Rhesus 8 F 1:640 1:640 1:640
Cynomolgus 5 F 1:640 1:640 1:1,280
Cynomolgus 6 F 1:640 1:640 1:1,280
Cynomolgus 7 M 1:640 1:1,280 1:1,280
Cynomolgus 8 M 1:640 1:1280 1:1280

*Values are titers. Limit of detection was a titer of 1:20. DPI, day postinoculation; PRNT80, 80% plaque reduction neutralization test; –, no detectable serologic response.

Main Article

Page created: July 17, 2017
Page updated: July 17, 2017
Page reviewed: July 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.