Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

Influenza D Virus in Animal Species in Guangdong Province, Southern China

Shao-Lun Zhai1Comments to Author , He Zhang1, Sheng-Nan Chen1, Xia Zhou, Tao Lin, Runxia Liu, Dian-Hong Lv, Xiao-Hui Wen, Wen-Kang Wei1, Dan Wang, and Feng LiComments to Author 
Author affiliations: South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA (S.-L. Zhai, S.-N. Chen, T. Lin, R. Liu, D. Wang, F. Li); Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China (S.-L. Zhai, D.-H. Lv, X.-H. Wen, W.-K. Wei); South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou (H. Zhang, X. Zhou)

Cite This Article


Molecular tests revealed influenza D viruses of D/OK lineage widely circulating in farmed animal species in Guangdong Province, southern China. In particular, we found high levels of influenza D virus infection in goats and pigs. We also detected viral RNA in serum specimens and feces of animals with certain severe diseases.

Four types of influenza viruses (A–D) have been confirmed ( The recently discovered influenza D virus is thought to cause respiratory diseases primarily in cattle and to a lesser extent in pigs (14). Moreover, serologic evidence for influenza D virus infection in small ruminants and humans has been established (5,6). Since the initial influenza D virus isolation in the United States in 2011 (1), the virus has been reported in China, Mexico, France, Italy, and Japan (711). Genetic analysis of the hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene demonstrated that these viruses had 2 distinct lineages, represented by D/OK and D/660 (12). Recently, a novel influenza D virus that emerged in Japan has been proposed as the third lineage (11). D/OK lineage–related viruses were previously identified in native Luxi yellow cattle in Shandong Province, northern China (7). Despite good progress in identifying domestic cattle as the primary reservoir of influenza D virus, we know little about prevalence in other animals. We conducted a study to clarify the origin and transmission dynamics of influenza D virus in goats, buffalo, and pigs as well as farmed cattle.

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Farm locations for study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs, Guangdong Province, China.

Figure 1. Farm locations for study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs, Guangdong Province, China.

In 2016, we collected 607 clinical samples from 4 species of animals with different clinical diseases and 250 nasal swab samples from asymptomatic animals (Table) from 16 farms in 4 cities of Guangdong Province: Guangzhou, Qingyuan, Heyuan, and Jiangmen (Figure 1). In addition, we randomly chose 200 archived Holstein dairy cattle serum samples, 40 per year, from 2011–2015 to investigate possible early RNA distribution of influenza D virus in this region. We used the reverse transcription PCR method and subcloning protocol (Technical Appendix). We performed sequence alignment using ClustalW implemented in DNAStar software (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and we conducted phylogenetic analyses based on our obtained sequences and reference truncated sequences (496-bp) of influenza D viruses from GenBank by using MEGA 5.1 software (; Technical Appendix Table).

After testing by reverse transcription PCR with further sequencing confirmation, we found influenza D virus–positive rates in 230 total nasal swab samples of 12.8% (20/156) for dairy cattle, 7.3% (4/55) for native yellow cattle, and 36.8% (7/19) for pigs. Rates in 324 total serum samples were 7.8% (15/193) for dairy cattle, 5.9% (3/51) for buffalo, and 33.8% (27/80) for goats. The influenza D virus–positive rate was also high (28.9%, 13/45) in swine lung samples. In contrast, we found no or low prevalence (<2%) in asymptomatic animals tested (Table). Moreover, all of the archived serum samples were found to be influenza D virus negative. Interestingly, 1 of 8 rectal swabs of goats with severe diarrhea tested positive (Table). Samples from animals with reproductive problems had a positive rate of 4.3% (5/116) (Table).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of viruses from study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs in Guangdong Province and neighboring provinces, China, compared with reference viruses. Partial hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene sequences (496 bp) were aligned by using ClustalW implemented in DNAStar software (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and the phylogenetic tree was obtained using neighbor-joining method within MEGA 5.1 software ( Numbers at nodes

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of viruses from study of influenza D viruses in cattle, goats, buffalo, and pigs in Guangdong Province and neighboring provinces, China, compared with reference viruses. Partial hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion gene sequences...

Sequence alignment analysis showed that the nucleotide sequences of influenza D viruses found in this study shared high similarity (99%–100%) with previously described sequences from China (7) and low similarity (93.8%–98.8%) with sequences originating from the United States, France, Italy, Mexico, and Japan (1,812). Similarly, phylogenetic analysis revealed that all influenza D virus sequences in this study clustered together with previous sequences from China and belonged to the D/OK lineage (Figure 2).


When first discovered, influenza D virus was reported in diseased pigs in the United States (1). Later, it was identified in cattle and swine herds in several other countries, with or without clinical manifestation (711). Moreover, antibodies to influenza D virus were detected in goats, sheep, and humans (56). Under experimental conditions, influenza D virus replicated and transmitted among ferrets and guinea pigs (13). We confirmed that influenza D virus is widely present in cattle species (dairy cattle, yellow cattle, and buffalo). We also found influenza D virus at a high prevalence (>30%) in pigs and goats (Table), which is in contrast to the low prevalence found in previous investigations (1,5,10). The high prevalence may be caused by poor biosecurity measures and high-density feeding mode practices in China’s animal industry as well as possible cross-species transmission (13). Taken together, our findings expand the host range of influenza D virus and further emphasize the health concern this virus poses to multiple animal species.

Previous studies have shown that influenza D viruses are mainly found in respiratory tract samples (14,7,912) and that they have played an etiologic role in bovine respiratory diseases (24). In this study, we found that influenza D virus RNA was present in cattle and goat serum samples; it was also present in goat rectal swabs, accompanied by peste des petits ruminants virus and caprine kobuvirus (data not shown). The distribution of influenza D virus in our study is not the same as that described under experimental conditions (3).

Influenza viremia, an indicator of disease severity (14), has been detected in 20.9% of severe cases during the acute phase of infection or before host death. Our detection of influenza D virus genome in serum samples from severely diseased animals (Table) implies that the virus could enter transiently into the animal’s circulatory system through capillaries lining the respiratory tract, which further contributes to the possibility of detecting virus in other organs. Similar to previous studies (2,4), we also found that the reverse transcription PCR positive rate was significantly higher (4%–40%) in diseased animals than the rate (<2%) observed in asymptomatic animals (p<0.05), which suggests a potential correlation between the disease severity and presence of influenza D virus. For influenza D virus found in rectal swabs, it might be that animals have swallowed the virus. Another possibility is that, similar to influenza A and B viruses, influenza D virus can replicate within the intestinal tract (15).

We detected influenza D virus in cattle with reproductive disorders. However, we could not determine whether influenza D virus is associated with reproductive problems. Future studies can be designed to investigate these scientific issues.

To date, 2 lineages of influenza D virus (D/OK and D/660) co-circulate in North America and Europe (810,12). However, only the D/OK lineage has been found in China, and a potential third lineage was found in Japan (7,11). Our study confirms and further extends the previous observation that D/OK lineage circulates in East Asia. The viral, host, and ecologic factors that shape the observed contrasting phylodynamics of influenza D viruses among different geographic regions warrant further investigation.

In addition, we found different minor genetic variants circulating on the same farm (Figure 2), indicating the ongoing evolution of influenza D viruses in their hosts (7,8,11). In comparing our sequences to the reference sequences from different animal species, we found 4 frequent nucleotide mutations (at positions 136, 231, 263, and 486) (online Technical Appendix Figure 1), which caused 2 amino acid mutations at positions 77 and 88 (online Technical Appendix Figure 2). Interestingly, among 4 nucleotide mutations, 1 unique nucleotide (T at position 486) was originally from the D/660 lineage. Moreover, we found several consistent sequences co-circulating in multiple animal species (online Technical Appendix Figure 1). Our speculation is that homologous recombination among different influenza D viruses and potential cross-species transmission under field conditions are possible, but further study is needed.

In summary, our study investigating the infection status of influenza D virus in different farmed animal species in Guangdong Province provides novel insights into the epidemiology and evolution of this virus. In particular, we document the molecular evidence for influenza D virus infection in goats and buffalo.

Dr. Zhai is an associate professor at Animal Disease Diagnostic Center, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. His research interests focus on surveillance and rapid response research of emerging or reemerging animal pathogens. In 2016–17, he is a visiting scholar at the Department of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University.



We are very grateful to Ben M. Hause, Milton Thomas, and Hunter Nedland for their suggestions and English editing when we revised this manuscript.

This work was supported by Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Grant no. 2016A040403083), Guangdong Provincial Agricultural Department (Grant no. 2016LM3177), and Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (Grant no. 2015GA780010). The work was also supported in part by SDSU AES Fund 3AH-477 to F.L. and D.W. S.-L.Z. is sponsored by Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.



  1. Hause  BM, Ducatez  M, Collin  EA, Ran  Z, Liu  R, Sheng  Z, et al. Isolation of a novel swine influenza virus from Oklahoma in 2011 which is distantly related to human influenza C viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003176. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ng  TF, Kondov  NO, Deng  X, Van Eenennaam  A, Neibergs  HL, Delwart  E. A metagenomics and case-control study to identify viruses associated with bovine respiratory disease. J Virol. 2015;89:53409. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferguson  L, Olivier  AK, Genova  S, Epperson  WB, Smith  DR, Schneider  L, et al. Pathogenesis of influenza D virus in cattle. J Virol. 2016;90:563642. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mitra  N, Cernicchiaro  N, Torres  S, Li  F, Hause  BM. Metagenomic characterization of the virome associated with bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle identified novel viruses and suggests an etiologic role for influenza D virus. J Gen Virol. 2016;97:177184. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Quast  M, Sreenivasan  C, Sexton  G, Nedland  H, Singrey  A, Fawcett  L, et al. Serological evidence for the presence of influenza D virus in small ruminants. Vet Microbiol. 2015;180:2815. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. White  SK, Ma  W, McDaniel  CJ, Gray  GC, Lednicky  JA. Serologic evidence of exposure to influenza D virus among persons with occupational contact with cattle. J Clin Virol. 2016;81:313. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jiang  WM, Wang  SC, Peng  C, Yu  JM, Zhuang  QY, Hou  GY, et al. Identification of a potential novel type of influenza virus in Bovine in China. Virus Genes. 2014;49:4936. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferguson  L, Eckard  L, Epperson  WB, Long  LP, Smith  D, Huston  C, et al. Influenza D virus infection in Mississippi beef cattle. Virology. 2015;486:2834. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ducatez  MF, Pelletier  C, Meyer  G. Influenza D virus in cattle, France, 2011-2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:36871. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiapponi  C, Faccini  S, De Mattia  A, Baioni  L, Barbieri  I, Rosignoli  C, et al. Detection of influenza D virus among swine and cattle, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:3524. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Murakami  S, Endoh  M, Kobayashi  T, Takenaka-Uema  A, Chambers  JK, Uchida  K, et al. Influenza D virus infection in herd of cattle, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:15179. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Collin  EA, Sheng  Z, Lang  Y, Ma  W, Hause  BM, Li  F. Cocirculation of two distinct genetic and antigenic lineages of proposed influenza D virus in cattle. J Virol. 2015;89:103642. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sreenivasan  C, Thomas  M, Sheng  Z, Hause  BM, Collin  EA, Knudsen  DE, et al. Replication and transmission of the novel bovine influenza D virus in a guinea pig model. J Virol. 2015;89:119902001. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tse  H, To  KK, Wen  X, Chen  H, Chan  KH, Tsoi  HW, et al. Clinical and virological factors associated with viremia in pandemic influenza A/H1N1/2009 virus infection. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22534. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirose  R, Daidoji  T, Naito  Y, Watanabe  Y, Arai  Y, Oda  T, et al. Long-term detection of seasonal influenza RNA in faeces and intestine. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:813.e17. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2308.170059

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Shao-Lun Zhai, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Prevention, Animal Disease Diagnostic Center, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 21 Baishigang St, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510640, China; ; Feng Li, Department of Biology and Microbiology & Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 17, 2017
Page updated: July 17, 2017
Page reviewed: July 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.