Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018
Research

Capsule Typing of Haemophilus influenzae by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry1

On This Page
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Downloads
Article
Technical Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
10
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Related Articles
Vesicular Stomatitis Virus–Based Vaccines
Suspected Measles with Discrepant Test Results
Mpox, Risk Modification, and Vaccination Uptake
More articles on Vaccine, Immunization
Author affiliations: Lund University, Malmö, Sweden (V. Månsson, K. Riesbeck, F. Resman); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (J.R. Gilsdorf); Växjö Hospital, Växjö, Sweden (G. Kahlmeter); Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (M. Kilian); Imperial College London, London, UK (J.S. Kroll)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae strains belong to type-specific genetic lineages. Reliable capsule typing requires PCR, but a more efficient method would be useful. We evaluated capsule typing by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Isolates of all capsule types (a−f and nontypeable; n = 258) and isogenic capsule transformants (types a−d) were investigated. Principal component and biomarker analyses of mass spectra showed clustering, and mass peaks correlated with capsule type-specific genetic lineages. We used 31 selected isolates to construct a capsule typing database. Validation with the remaining isolates (n = 227) showed 100% sensitivity and 92.2% specificity for encapsulated strains (a−f; n = 61). Blinded validation of a supplemented database (n = 50) using clinical isolates (n = 126) showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for encapsulated strains (b, e, and f; n = 28). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is an accurate method for capsule typing of H. influenzae.

Haemophilus influenzae is subdivided into encapsulated strains, which express different serotypes of capsular polysaccharide (designated types a–f), and nonencapsulated strains, which are designated nontypeable H. influenzae (NTHi) (1). Since the introduction of conjugate vaccines against H. influenzae type b (Hib), a common cause of meningitis, epiglottitis, and sepsis in small children, the epidemiology of invasive H. influenzae disease has changed dramatically, with an increase in the diversity of serotypes responsible for illness.

Although the incidence of Hib disease has decreased in countries implementing childhood vaccination (2), invasive disease caused by NTHi has become more prominent during the same period, especially among newborns and the elderly (3–6). In the postvaccination era, increasing incidences and outbreaks of invasive H. influenzae type a (Hia) infections have been reported in South and North America (7–10), particularly among the indigenous populations in Canada and the United States (7,8,10). Studies have also suggested an increase in cases of invasive H. influenzae type e (Hie) and type f (Hif) disease (4,11,12). Hib vaccine failures have been described (13), and omission of booster dose(s) appears to result in a rapidly increased incidence of invasive Hib disease (14,15), suggesting continued circulation of Hib isolates in the community. Globally, one third of eligible children still do not receive adequate vaccination (16).

Encapsulated H. influenzae strains are generally genetically clonal. This finding was first demonstrated by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, by which encapsulated isolates could be separated into different genetic lineages that correspond to different capsule types (17). This clonal population structure has been confirmed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), which assigns isolates to different sequence types (STs), although some differences have been observed in the organization of different lineages (18). There are 3 known major genetic groups of Hia and Hib (18,19). Two genetic groups of Hia (related to ST21 and ST23) account for most Hia isolates in the MLST database (20). For Hib, ST6-related isolates account for most cases (17,18), whereas the second most common genetic group is related to ST222 (18,21). There is 1 known lineage each for serotypes c through f (18,19). In contrast, NTHi are genetically heterogenous (19).

Capsule typing of H. influenzae has traditionally been performed by using slide agglutination with antisera (conventional serotyping), but incorrect results are common, and specificity for encapsulated isolates is low (22,23). Determination of presence of the capsule gene complex (bexA or bexB) by PCR, followed by type-specific cap a–f PCRs has excellent sensitivity and specificity but is laborious and time-consuming (24–27). Because of limitations of current typing methods, typing might be delayed or not performed in clinical practice. However, rapidly obtained information on capsule type is still of interest for the treating clinician (5) and, in particular, for monitoring of capsule type distribution and effectiveness of Hib vaccination programs, especially with respect to invasive disease.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry is commonly used to identify bacterial and fungal species, including H. influenzae, by analyzing the composition of ribosomal proteins in a sample. It is a rapid and convenient method and has a low cost per sample (28). Recently, we have shown that MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry can separate Hib from non-b H. influenzae (29). In this study, we examined the capacity of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to perform full capsule typing of H. influenzae. This method would be valuable for first-line diagnostics of H. influenzae to identify patients at risk for immunodeficiency or anatomic cerebrospinal fluid space defect, and to detect rapidly outbreaks caused by specific capsule types. It would also increase time and cost effectiveness of surveillance of H. influenzae epidemiology and Hib vaccination efficacy.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolates

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Culture collections and methods used in this study for capsule typing of Haemophilus influenzae by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. An evaluation set of H. influenzae isolates of all capsule types from diverse geographic origins and time periods and isogenic capsule transformants (30) were used to investigate capsule type-specific differences in MALDI-TOF mass spectra. MLST was used to ensure adequate coverage of different genetic lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae. Reference isolat

Figure 1. Culture collections and methods used in this study for capsule typing of Haemophilus influenzae by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. An evaluation set of H. influenzae isolates of all capsule types from diverse...

We used 2 culture collections in this study (Figure 1). The first collection was an evaluation set of isolates used to construct a coherent reference database and was composed of 258 H. influenzae strains. It included isolates from 3 major clinical laboratories in Sweden (Malmö/Lund, Gothenburg, and Stockholm) obtained in 1997–2011 but also a wide range of international strains from different countries, continents, and time periods (n = 41; Technical Appendix Table). In addition, we included 4 isogenic capsule-transformed strains of types a (Rb–/a+:02), b (Rb+:02), c (Rb–/c+:02), and d (Rb–/d+:02) (30) in the study. These strains originate from strain Rd, a capsule-deficient type d strain (31). For validation of the new MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry typing method, we used a second collection composed of 126 bloodstream and cerebrospinal fluid H. influenzae isolates obtained in Sweden during 2010 and 2013–2016. All isolates were identified as H. influenzae by using standard laboratory taxonomy techniques and were grown on chocolate agar plates overnight (18–24 h) in a humid atmosphere at 37°C containing 5% CO2 before any experiments were conducted.

PCR for Capsule Typing and MLST

We prepared DNA by adding a few colonies of bacteria to distilled water. After heating at 98°C for 10 min, we centrifuged each sample at 16,000 × g for 5–10 min and collected the supernatant. In a few instances, we extracted DNA by using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We performed capsule typing by PCR using bexB and type-specific cap primers for all isolates as described (24–26).

We performed PCR for MLST genes as described (18) and sequenced the resulting PCR products by using the forward primer and, if necessary for adequate sequence quality, the reverse primer. We trimmed and edited sequences before concatenation (total length 3,057 bp). We deposited MLST nucleotide sequences in GenBank (accession nos. MG550316–MG550889). Some isolates had been previously typed by MLST. In these instances, we retrieved MLST data from the MLST database (20).

Analysis of MLST Data

We determined sequence types by using the MLST database. We aligned concatenated sequences in Geneious 9.1.8 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) and used the PAUP* 4.0a158 plug-in (http://phylosolutions.com/paup-test/) to construct a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree. The best fitting model was estimated to be the generalized time-reversible model including invariant sites and gamma distribution by using the Akaike information criterion in jModelTest 2.1.10 (32,33). We visualized the resulting tree by using FigTree 1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). All isolate and ST information has been submitted to the MLST database.

Acquisition of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Data

We acquired mass spectra by using a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), with default settings as described (29). We prepared all isolates for acquisition of spectra by using the ethanol–formic acid procedure described by the instrument manufacturer. We spotted isolates on 2 spots and analyzed each spot 3 times, resulting in 6 spectra/isolate. Isolates in the reference database were spotted on 8 spots, resulting in 24 spectra, before being added to the database.

Analysis of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Data

In Mass-Up 1.0.13 (34), we preprocessed and analyzed raw spectra of all isolates in the evaluation set (n = 258) and capsule transformants (n = 4) by using the integrated MALDIquant analysis package for R (http://strimmerlab.org/software/maldiquant/). We performed preprocessing with intensity transformation (square root), smoothing (Savitzky–Golay), baseline correction (Top-Hat), and intensity standardization (total ion current). We performed peak detection with a signal-to-noise ratio of 2, a half window size of 50, and no minimum peak intensity. We calculated a consensus spectrum for each isolate with a peak tolerance of 0.002 and percentage of presence of 60%. For principal component analysis (PCA) (35) and biomarker analysis, we performed intersample matching with a peak tolerance of 0.002. PCA was performed with default settings (maximum number of components = −1 and 0.95 of the total variance covered). In the biomarker analysis, we calculated a p value for each peak by using the randomization test of independence.

Construction and Validation of a MALDI Biotyper Database for Capsule Typing

We used selected isolates from the evaluation set to create main spectra (MSPs) for a new MALDI Biotyper 4.1 database (Bruker Daltonics) (Figure 1). These reference isolates were selected to represent all capsule types and genetic lineages. NTHi strains were selected with the aim of including isolates of all known genetic clades (19). Spectra of reference isolates were controlled by using FlexAnalysis (Bruker Daltonics). We performed smoothing (Savitzky-Golay) and baseline correction (Top-Hat) and excluded spectra with outlier appearance (lacking or having an extra peak) and low quality (peaks outside a 500 ppm range). If <20 spectra remained after the control, new spectra for that specific isolate were obtained. We used default settings for spectra preprocessing, MSP creation, and identification as described (29).

We used isolates in the evaluation set not selected as reference isolates for initial validation of the database (Figure 1). Because all isolates were H. influenzae, high score values (>2.0) were expected. Thus, we classified each spectrum according to the top matching MSP in the new database. For isolate classification, >5/6 spectra classified to the same type (a–f or NTHi) were required. If <4/6 spectra were classified to the same type, the isolate was classified as inconclusive. To improve the specificity of the typing method, considering the known heterogeneity of NTHi, we supplemented the capsule typing database with NTHi isolates not correctly classified in the initial validation until all isolates in the evaluation set not included in the database were correctly classified on every single spectrum. Finally, we blindly validated the supplemented database by using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry classification of invasive isolates (n = 126) obtained during 2010 and 2013–2016 and calculated sensitivity and specificity by using PCR typing as the standard (Figure 1).

Results

Genetic Lineages of Encapsulated H. influenzae in the Evaluation Set

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) of encapsulated and nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae isolates. MLST was performed on a subset of encapsulated isolates (n = 44) from the evaluation set, including all type a and type b isolates (n = 33). All major genetic lineages (indicated by colors), except the least common lineage of Hia (ST4-related), of encapsulated H. influenzae were represented in the collection, including the 2 more common lineages of Hia and all 3 lineages of Hib.

Figure 2. Multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) of encapsulated and nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae isolates. MLST was performed on a subset of encapsulated isolates (n = 44) from the evaluation set, including all type a...

To construct a clinically useful reference database for capsule typing by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, we aimed to identify and collect isolates from all known lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae (Figure 2; online Technical Appendix Table). We performed MLST for all Hia (n = 9) and Hib isolates (n = 24) in the evaluation set, in addition to a subset of isolates of other capsule types (c–f), capsule transformants (n = 4), and NTHi. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the collection contained isolates from different genetic lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae, including the 2 major genetic groups of type a and all 3 lineages of type b (Figure 2). Capsule transformants belonged to the known genetic lineage of Hid isolates (Figure 2) and were the same ST as the parental strain Rd (18). One isolate (KR1130) was typed by PCR as Hif (bexB- and cap f-positive) but phylogenetically belonged to a lineage separate from all other Hif isolates. Thus, this isolate was not part of the established, ST124-related Hif lineage (Figure 2). The cap locus of this isolate was sequenced and found to be a nonexpressed pseudogene (data not shown).

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry of Genetic Lineages of Encapsulated H. influenzae

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Principal component analysis (PCA) of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of encapsulated and nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae. A) PCA of all isolates (n = 258) of H. influenzae in the evaluation set representing all capsule types, which are color-coded according to capsule type and for Hia and Hib isolates by genetic lineage as shown by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and capsule transformants (n = 4). The first 3 principal components (PC

Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of encapsulated and nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae. A) PCA of all isolates (n = 258) of H. influenzae in the evaluation...

We performed PCA for all isolates in the evaluation set (n = 258) and the capsule transformants (n = 4). As expected, NTHi formed a large heterogeneous group, but clustering of encapsulated isolates of the same capsule types was found (Figure 3, panel A). When PCA was performed on encapsulated isolates (n = 83) and capsule transformants (n = 4) only, the clustering became clearer and was particularly evident for Hib, Hie, and Hif isolates (Figure 3, panel B). Encapsulated isolates segregated in groups according to capsule type and, for Hia and Hib isolates, by genetic lineage according to MLST (Figure 2; 3, panel B). Capsule transformants were found as a separate group in close proximity of Hid isolates and not distributed according to their respective capsule type (Figure 3, panel B). Isolate KR1130 did not cluster with Hif isolates of the ST124-related lineage (Figure 3, panel B).

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Biomarker analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae. Analysis was performed on all encapsulated isolates in the evaluation set (n = 83) and capsule transformants (n = 4). Rows are peaks (2,000–20,000 m/z in descending order), and columns are groups of encapsulated H. influenzae. A total of 124 peaks with discriminatory power (p&lt;0.05) between different capsule types and genetic lineages were identifie

Figure 4. Biomarker analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae. Analysis was performed on all encapsulated isolates in the evaluation set (n = 83) and capsule transformants (n...

Biomarker analysis of encapsulated isolates and capsule transformants identified several peaks conserved within the different genetic lineages of capsule types, indicating the possibility of separating them on the basis of MALDI-TOF mass spectra (Figure 4). Capsule transformants expressed similar peak patterns relative to each other but differed in many peaks when compared with wild-type strains of the same capsule types.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Automated Capsule Typing by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

An initial capsule typing reference database was constructed in MALDI Biotyper. Encapsulated isolates (n = 22) representing all major genetic lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae were included (Figure 2). To ensure adequate coverage of potential variation within each lineage, multiple reference isolates were chosen for each lineage (when possible) on the basis of geographic origin and variations in mass spectra. In addition, NTHi (n = 9) representing 8 of 10 known genetic clades of NTHi (19) were included in the database (Figure 2).

Validation of the original database (n = 31) using the remaining isolates in the evaluation set (n = 227) showed 100% sensitivity for encapsulated isolates (Table 1), and every isolate was correctly classified on every spectrum. All capsule transformants were classified as type d, the original serotype of the parental strain Rd (31). No isolate matched KR1130, the isolate typed by PCR as Hif with a pseudogene cap locus.

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Principal component analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of NTHi in the original and supplemented databases. Isolates are color-coded according to database affiliation, and the first 3 principal components (PC0, PC1, and PC2) are shown in 2-dimensional plots. No clustering similar to that for encapsulated isolates was observed. NTHi reference isolates in the original capsule typing database (n = 9), representing different genetic clades

Figure 5. Principal component analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectra of NTHi in the original and supplemented databases. Isolates are color-coded according to database affiliation, and the first 3 principal components...

A few NTHi were either inconclusively typed or misclassified as encapsulated, resulting in reduced specificity for encapsulated isolates (Table 1). For this reason, we supplemented the capsule typing database with misclassified NTHi from the evaluation set until the database correctly classified all the remaining isolates in the evaluation set on every single spectrum. This modification resulted in an additional 19 NTHi being added to the MALDI Biotyper database (Figure 2). When PCA was performed separately for NTHi in the evaluation set, it was evident that the supplemented database covered the heterogeneity of NTHi better than the original database (Figure 5). The same finding was evident from phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2). Five NTHi were misclassified as Hie and could not be added to the database because they interfered with classification of true Hie isolates and would decrease sensitivity for Hie (Figure 2).

As a final performance test, we blindly validated the supplemented database (n = 50) by using a separate culture collection consisting of clinical invasive isolates from Sweden (n = 126) obtained during 2010 and 2013–2016. When we compared MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry capsule typing results with PCR capsule typing results, all encapsulated isolates (types b, e, and f; n = 28) were correctly classified on every single spectrum (Table 2). Of 98 NTHi, only 5 were not correctly classified. These isolates were all classified as inconclusive. Thus, no NTHi was incorrectly classified as encapsulated, and the resulting sensitivity and specificity of capsule typing was 100% in the final validation (Table 2).

Discussion

In this study, we have shown that encapsulated H. influenzae have different MALDI-TOF mass spectra that correlate with genetic lineages representing different capsule types. We have demonstrated that, after construction of a comprehensive reference database, routine MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis has excellent capacity for identifying type-specific genetic lineages associated with encapsulated H. influenzae and thereby can be used for capsule typing of H. influenzae.

Our study had several strengths. We analyzed a large collection of well-characterized strains collected at different times from various geographic regions to ensure the robustness of our findings. Using MLST, we ensured adequate coverage of the major genetic lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry reference database. Moreover, the database was carefully evaluated and supplemented to ensure adequate coverage of the heterogeneity of NTHi. We blindly validated the supplemented database to mimic an authentic clinical or epidemiologic situation and demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional PCR-based typing. During construction of the capsule typing database, we identified several isolates previously typed by PCR or agglutination (by us or others) in which the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry results did not match the suggested capsule type. When we retyped these isolates by PCR, the capsule type suggested by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry proved to be correct in all instances (except for the NTHi typed as Hie) (Figure 2), and isolates were reassigned to a new capsule type, further supporting the capacity of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for capsule typing.

Our study had some limitations. The first limitation reflects the limited availability of some rare variants. Our collection contained no Hia isolates belonging to the uncommon ST4-related genetic group. For the ST61-related lineage of Hib, we had access to only 1 isolate, which was included in the reference database and thus not represented in the test collection. However, our ST61 isolate was separable when mass spectra were analyzed by PCA and biomarker analysis, and no isolate was misclassified to this lineage in the initial or final validation of the typing databases. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that identification of the ST222-related Hib lineage by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is possible (Table 1), which was not the case previously (29). The second potential limitation arises through the genetic heterogeneity of NTHi, making adequate representation in the reference database a challenge (19). This limitation was apparent during the initial evaluation of the typing method, when some NTHi were misclassified. To address this issue, we supplemented the database with 19 additional reference NTHi strains. The final validation of our typing method demonstrated excellent specificity for NTHi, but the sensitivity for identifying encapsulated isolates remained unchanged. Because most invasive infections in countries implementing Hib vaccination are caused by NTHi, a high specificity is desirable (3–5).

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has proved valuable in subtyping several clinically relevant bacteria, including Clostridium difficile (36), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (37,38), and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (39). Subtyping generally relies on common genetic differences between isolates, reflected in the composition of the proteins measured. In our study, wild-type isolates of different capsule types could be separated, but isogenic capsule transformants could not. These isolates were classified as type d, the original capsule type of the parental strain Rd. This finding confirms that capsule type identification is based on a proxy identification of genetic lineage, rather than identification of capsule biosynthesis-associated proteins. Thus, our method is an indirect typing method, as opposed to serotyping, which identifies the capsule polysaccharide, and PCR, which identifies the capsule gene complex directly.

Although there is little evidence that new lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae have appeared historically, novel lineages of encapsulated strains might appear and be missed by the method. Isolate KR1130 used in this study was initially suspected to represent such a lineage. However, its cap locus was shown to be on a nonexpressed pseudogene. Only 1 other isolate of the same ST (ST184) is currently registered in the MLST database, and it is a nontypeable isolate. No other Hif strain in this study or the MLST database belongs to this genetic lineage (20).

One advantage of indirect capsule type identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is that determination of genetic lineage of encapsulated isolates can be made without further analysis. The method can also identify previously encapsulated capsule-deficient strains, which have lost parts or all of the cap locus, either during infection or laboratory handling (40–42).

A concern regarding subtyping by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (43) is the potential need for special sample preparations, such as growth conditions and type of matrix. In several studies, differences in mass spectra between subtypes of various species were observed but no automated classification methods were reported (43), which might limit general applicability. In this study, we used standard growth conditions, as well as routine ethanol–formic acid extraction and mass spectra acquisition protocols. The software used (MALDI Biotyper) also has the advantage of being a standard software used in clinical settings. These factors greatly increased the chance of clinical implementation of our findings.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that rapid capsule typing of H. influenzae by identification of capsule type-specific genetic lineages using routine MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is possible and highly accurate. After further large-scale validation, this method has the potential for clinical and research use. With the increasing heterogeneity in capsule types of disease-causing H. influenzae observed since Hib conjugate vaccines were introduced, the method can become a valuable tool in clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Dr. Månsson is a physician and doctoral student in clinical microbiology at the Riesbeck Laboratory, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. His main research interests are respiratory tract infections, with special focus on H. influenzae diagnostics, epidemiology, and antimicrobial drug resistance.

Top

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grants from the Foundations of Anna and Edwin Berger (to K.R.); the Royal Physiographical Society of Lund, (Forssmans Foundation (to V.M.); the Swedish Medical Research Council (grant no. K2015-57X-03163-43-4; http://www.vr.se); and the Skåne County Council Research and Development Foundation (to K.R.).

Top

References

  1. Pittman  M. Variation and type specificity in the bacterial species Haemophilus influenzae. J Exp Med. 1931;53:471–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Peltola  H. Worldwide Haemophilus influenzae type b disease at the beginning of the 21st century: global analysis of the disease burden 25 years after the use of the polysaccharide vaccine and a decade after the advent of conjugates. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:302–17. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Langereis  JD, de Jonge  MI. Invasive disease caused by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1711–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Resman  F, Ristovski  M, Ahl  J, Forsgren  A, Gilsdorf  JR, Jasir  A, et al. Invasive disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae in Sweden 1997-2009; evidence of increasing incidence and clinical burden of non-type b strains. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1638–45. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ladhani  S, Slack  MP, Heath  PT, von Gottberg  A, Chandra  M, Ramsay  ME; European Union Invasive Bacterial Infection Surveillance participants. Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease, Europe, 1996-2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:455–63. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Whittaker  R, Economopoulou  A, Dias  JG, Bancroft  E, Ramliden  M, Celentano  LP; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Country Experts for Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease. Epidemiology of Invasive Haemophilus influenzae Disease, Europe, 2007-2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:396–404. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bender  JM, Cox  CM, Mottice  S, She  RC, Korgenski  K, Daly  JA, et al. Invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease in Utah children: an 11-year population-based study in the era of conjugate vaccine. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:e41–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruce  MG, Zulz  T, DeByle  C, Singleton  R, Hurlburt  D, Bruden  D, et al. Haemophilus influenzae serotype a invasive disease, Alaska, USA, 1983-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:932–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zanella  RC, Bokermann  S, Andrade  AL, Flannery  B, Brandileone  MC. Changes in serotype distribution of Haemophilus influenzae meningitis isolates identified through laboratory-based surveillance following routine childhood vaccination against H. influenzae type b in Brazil. Vaccine. 2011;29:8937–42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rotondo  JL, Sherrard  L, Helferty  M, Tsang  R, Desai  S. The epidemiology of invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenzae serotype a in the Canadian North from 2000 to 2010. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013;72:72. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bajanca-Lavado  MP, Simões  AS, Betencourt  CR, Sá-Leão  R; Portuguese Group for Study of Haemophilus influenzae invasive infection. Characteristics of Haemophilus influenzae invasive isolates from Portugal following routine childhood vaccination against H. influenzae serotype b (2002-2010). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:603–10. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ladhani  SN, Collins  S, Vickers  A, Litt  DJ, Crawford  C, Ramsay  ME, et al. Invasive Haemophilus influenzae serotype e and f disease, England and Wales. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:725–32. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ladhani  S, Heath  PT, Slack  MP, McIntyre  PB, Diez-Domingo  J, Campos  J, et al.; Participants of the European Union Invasive Bacterial Infections Surveillance Network. Haemophilus influenzae serotype b conjugate vaccine failure in twelve countries with established national childhood immunization programmes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:948–54. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladhani  SN. Two decades of experience with the Haemophilus influenzae serotype b conjugate vaccine in the United Kingdom. Clin Ther. 2012;34:385–99. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Juarez  MD, Rancaño  C, Neyro  S, Biscayart  C, Katz  N, Pasinovich  M, et al. What’s happening with Haemophilus influenzae type B invasive disease in Latin America region? Argentina’s experience. In: Abstracts of IDWeek 2016, New Orleans, October 26–30. Abstract no. 768 [cited 2017 Dec 18]. https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2016/webprogram/POSTER.html
  16. World Health Organization. Global and regional immunization profile, 2016 global summary [cited 2017 Nov 9]. http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/gs_gloprofile.pdf?ua=1
  17. Musser  JM, Kroll  JS, Moxon  ER, Selander  RK. Clonal population structure of encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae. Infect Immun. 1988;56:1837–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Meats  E, Feil  EJ, Stringer  S, Cody  AJ, Goldstein  R, Kroll  JS, et al. Characterization of encapsulated and noncapsulated Haemophilus influenzae and determination of phylogenetic relationships by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1623–36. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Erwin  AL, Sandstedt  SA, Bonthuis  PJ, Geelhood  JL, Nelson  KL, Unrath  WC, et al. Analysis of genetic relatedness of Haemophilus influenzae isolates by multilocus sequence typing. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1473–83. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. University of Oxford. Haemophilus influenzae MLST website [cited 2017 Nov 9]. http://pubmlst.org/hinfluenzae/
  21. Myers  AL, Jackson  MA, Zhang  L, Swanson  DS, Gilsdorf  JR. Haemophilus influenzae type b invasive disease in Amish children, Missouri, USA, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:112–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. LaClaire  LL, Tondella  ML, Beall  DS, Noble  CA, Raghunathan  PL, Rosenstein  NE, et al.; Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Team Members. Identification of Haemophilus influenzae serotypes by standard slide agglutination serotyping and PCR-based capsule typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:393–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Satola  SW, Collins  JT, Napier  R, Farley  MM. Capsule gene analysis of invasive Haemophilus influenzae: accuracy of serotyping and prevalence of IS1016 among nontypeable isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3230–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Falla  TJ, Crook  DW, Brophy  LN, Maskell  D, Kroll  JS, Moxon  ER. PCR for capsular typing of Haemophilus influenzae. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:2382–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis  GS, Sandstedt  SA, Patel  M, Marrs  CF, Gilsdorf  JR. Use of bexB to detect the capsule locus in Haemophilus influenzae. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2594–601. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lâm  TT, Elias  J, Frosch  M, Vogel  U, Claus  H. New diagnostic PCR for Haemophilus influenzae serotype e based on the cap locus of strain ATCC 8142. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301:176–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. van Ketel  RJ, de Wever  B, van Alphen  L. Detection of Haemophilus influenzae in cerebrospinal fluids by polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J Med Microbiol. 1990;33:271–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Clark  AE, Kaleta  EJ, Arora  A, Wolk  DM. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: a fundamental shift in the routine practice of clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:547–603. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Månsson  V, Resman  F, Kostrzewa  M, Nilson  B, Riesbeck  K. Identification of Haemophilus influenzae type b isolates by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization−time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2215–24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zwahlen  A, Kroll  JS, Rubin  LG, Moxon  ER. The molecular basis of pathogenicity in Haemophilus influenzae: comparative virulence of genetically-related capsular transformants and correlation with changes at the capsulation locus cap. Microb Pathog. 1989;7:225–35. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Alexander  HE, Leidy  G. Determination of inherited traits of H. influenzae by desoxyribonucleic acid fractions isolated from type-specific cells. J Exp Med. 1951;93:345–59. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Darriba  D, Taboada  GL, Doallo  R, Posada  D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Guindon  S, Gascuel  O, Rannala  B. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. López-Fernández  H, Santos  HM, Capelo  JL, Fdez-Riverola  F, Glez-Peña  D, Reboiro-Jato  M. Mass-Up: an all-in-one open software application for MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry knowledge discovery. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:318. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kehrmann  J, Wessel  S, Murali  R, Hampel  A, Bange  FC, Buer  J, et al. Principal component analysis of MALDI TOF MS mass spectra separates M. abscessus (sensu stricto) from M. massiliense isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rizzardi  K, Åkerlund  T. High molecular weight typing with MALDI-TOF MS: a novel method for rapid typing of Clostridium difficile. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122457. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Camoez  M, Sierra  JM, Dominguez  MA, Ferrer-Navarro  M, Vila  J, Roca  I. Automated categorization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates into different clonal complexes by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:161.e1–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Josten  M, Reif  M, Szekat  C, Al-Sabti  N, Roemer  T, Sparbier  K, et al. Analysis of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrum of Staphylococcus aureus identifies mutations that allow differentiation of the main clonal lineages. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1809–17. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ojima-Kato  T, Yamamoto  N, Suzuki  M, Fukunaga  T, Tamura  H. Discrimination of Escherichia coli O157, O26 and O111 from other serovars by MALDI-TOF MS based on the S10-GERMS method. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113458. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fothergill  LD, Chandler  CA, Spencer  M. Observations on the dissociation of meningitic strains of H. influenzae. J Immunol. 1936;31:401–15.
  41. Hoiseth  SK, Connelly  CJ, Moxon  ER. Genetics of spontaneous, high-frequency loss of b capsule expression in Haemophilus influenzae. Infect Immun. 1985;49:389–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsang  RS, Li  YA, Mullen  A, Baikie  M, Whyte  K, Shuel  M, et al. Laboratory characterization of invasive Haemophilus influenzae isolates from Nunavut, Canada, 2000-2012. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2016;75:29798. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sauget  M, Valot  B, Bertrand  X, Hocquet  D. Can MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry reasonably type bacteria? Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:447–55. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2403.170459

1Preliminary results from this study were presented at the IDWeek 2016 Conference, October 26−30, 2016, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Viktor Månsson, Riesbeck Laboratory, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 59, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 15, 2018
Page updated: February 15, 2018
Page reviewed: February 15, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external