Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019
Research

VAR2CSA Serology to Detect Plasmodium falciparum Transmission Patterns in Pregnancy

Author affiliations: ISGlobal, Hospital Clinic–Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (A.M. Fonseca, R. González, A. Bardají, M. Rupérez, A. Jiménez, L. Quintó, P. Cisteró, H. Gupta, J. Hegewisch-Taylor, J. Brew, C. Dobaño, J.J. Aponte, C. Menéndez, A. Mayor); ICBAS–Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal (A.M. Fonseca); Centro de Investigação em Saúde da Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique (R. González, A. Bardají, C. Jairoce, M. Rupérez, A. Vala, C. Sacoor, C. Dobaño, J.J. Aponte, A. Nhacolo, E. Sevene, E. Macete, C. Menéndez, A. Mayor); Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo (E. Sevene); CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain (R. González, A. Jiménez, A. Mayor, A. Bardají); Université d’Aboméy Calavi, Cotonou, Benin (N.T. Ndam, A. Massougbodji); Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya (S. Kariuki, P. Ouma); BCNatal–Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine–Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona (M. López); Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J. Brew); MERIT, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Paris, France (N.T. Ndam, V. Briand, M. Cot); Institut Pasteur, Paris (C.E. Chitnis); Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (G. Mombo-Ngoma); Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany (M. Ramharter, G. Mombo-Ngoma); University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg (M. Ramharter); Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (S. Abdulla); Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon (G. Mombo-Ngoma); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M. Desai)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Pregnant women constitute a promising sentinel group for continuous monitoring of malaria transmission. To identify antibody signatures of recent Plasmodium falciparum exposure during pregnancy, we dissected IgG responses against VAR2CSA, the parasite antigen that mediates placental sequestration. We used a multiplex peptide-based suspension array in 2,354 samples from pregnant women from Mozambique, Benin, Kenya, Gabon, Tanzania, and Spain. Two VAR2CSA peptides of limited polymorphism were immunogenic and targeted by IgG responses readily boosted during infection and with estimated half-lives of <2 years. Seroprevalence against these peptides reflected declines and rebounds of transmission in southern Mozambique during 2004–2012, reduced exposure associated with use of preventive measures during pregnancy, and local clusters of transmission that were missed by detection of P. falciparum infections. These data suggest that VAR2CSA serology can provide a useful adjunct for the fine-scale estimation of the malaria burden among pregnant women over time and space.

Agile malaria surveillance and response systems that can be sustained over time are needed for the optimal design of control programs (1,2). Rates of Plasmodium falciparum infection among pregnant women are sensitive to changes in transmission (3,4) and correlate well with infection in infants (5) and children (6,7). Thus, passive detection of malaria cases at maternal health care services constitutes a promising approach to providing contemporary data on the levels, and changes in levels, of malaria burden in the population for successful malaria control and elimination (8).

After exposure to P. falciparum parasites that sequester in the placenta (9), antibodies against VAR2CSA, a multidomain variant antigen of the P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 family, develop in pregnant women (10). VAR2CSA is expressed on the surface of infected erythrocytes and mediates placental sequestration of parasites through binding to chondroitin sulfate A (11). Levels of antibodies against VAR2CSA are affected by variables that influence the risk for P. falciparum exposure (1214) and mirror malaria trends during pregnancy (3). Moreover, levels of VAR2CSA IgG at delivery correlate with the risk for malaria in the offspring (14), suggesting the value of these antibodies for pinpointing areas of high malaria transmission (15). Because VAR2CSA antibodies persist after the infection is cleared (16), they can provide a sensitive adjunct for P. falciparum monitoring, especially in areas of low malaria endemicity, where the chances of detecting antibodies are higher than those of detecting the parasite (17).

The utility of serosurveillance depends mainly on specific properties of the antigen, including immunogenicity, polymorphism, cross-reactivity, and longevity of the antibodies. Because different VAR2CSA domains elicit IgG responses with varying magnitudes and dynamics (16,18,19), we hypothesized that short-lived antibodies against immunogenic nonpolymorphic VAR2CSA epitopes would enable a fine-scale estimation of recent P. falciparum transmission during pregnancy (17). We examined plasma from pregnant women living in areas in which P. falciparum transmission varied from high to low and absent (Benin, Gabon, Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania, and Spain) against a quantitative suspension array containing VAR2CSA and general parasite antigens. We first selected IgG responses that were rapidly acquired after P. falciparum infection, did persist in circulation, and were sensitive to the level of parasite exposure in pregnant women from Mozambique and Spain. We then used the serologic assay to quantify the relationship of VAR2CSA antibody responses with P. falciparum infection as well as with temporal, spatial, and intervention-driven changes in malaria burden among pregnant women.

Methods

Study Sites, Population, and Procedures

We included in our study pregnant women who participated in 3 clinical trials of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) during 2003–2005 in Mozambique (NCT00209781) (20) and during 2010–2012 in Mozambique, Benin, Gabon, Kenya, and Tanzania (NCT00811421) (21,22). Participants were recruited at their first antenatal visit, and all received a long-lasting insecticide-treated bed net. During 2003–2005, all received 2 doses of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (20); during 2010–2012, they received 2 doses of mefloquine or sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine if they were not HIV infected (21) and 3 doses of mefloquine or placebo plus daily cotrimoxazol prophylaxis if they were HIV infected (22). At delivery, tissue samples from the maternal side of the placenta, as well as 50 μL peripheral and placental dried blood spots (DBS), were collected. Peripheral and placental blood from pregnant women in Mozambique and Benin were also collected into EDTA Vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickinson, https://www.bd.com) and centrifuged; plasma was stored at −20°C. From a subset of pregnant women in Mozambique who delivered during 2011–2012, peripheral blood samples were also collected at the first antenatal visit and before administration of the second IPTp dose. We geocoded the households of women in Mozambique by using a global information system. Clinical malaria episodes were treated according to national guidelines at the time of the study (2022). DBS and plasma samples were also collected from 49 pregnant women never exposed to P. falciparum who delivered in 2010 at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain).

The study was approved by the ethics committees from the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, the Comité Consultatif de Déontologie et d’Éthique from the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (Marseille, France), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA), and national ethics review committees from each malaria-endemic country participating in the study. Written informed consent, which included permission to test for immune markers by using stored biological samples, was obtained from all participants.

Laboratory Determinations

At recruitment, we assessed HIV serostatus by using rapid diagnostic tests according to national guidelines and hemoglobin level at delivery by using the following mobile devices on capillary blood samples: HemoCue (Danaher, http://www.hemocue.com), Hemocontrol (EKF Diagnostics, http://www.ekfdiagnostics.com), and KX analyzer (Sysmex, http://www.sysmex.com). Thick and thin blood films and placental biopsy samples were checked for Plasmodium spp. according to standard, quality-controlled procedures (3). We tested blood on filter paper for the presence of P. falciparum in duplicate by means of a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting 18S ribosomal DNA (3).

Antibody Measurements

We measured IgG in plasma (Benin and Mozambique) or on DBS (Gabon, Kenya, and Tanzania) in appropriate conditions for plasma elution (19) by using xMAP technology and the Luminex 100/200 System (https://www.luminexcorp.com) for 37% of pregnant women participating in the clinical trials with samples available. We constructed 2 multiplex suspension array panels (Appendix 1) (19), 1 including P. falciparum recombinant proteins (VAR2CSA Duffy binding-like recombinant domains DBL3X, DBL5Ɛ; and DBL6Ɛ, apical membrane antigen 1 [AMA1]; and 19-kDa fragment of the merozoite surface protein-1 [MSP119], from 3D7 strain) and 1 consisting of synthetic peptides (25 VAR2CSA peptides covering conserved and semiconserved regions of VAR2CSA and a circumsporozoite peptide [pCSP]) (19). To assess unspecific IgG recognition, we used bovine serum albumin in both arrays (19). Procedures for reconstitution of DBS and quality control, bead-based immunoassay, data normalization, and definition of seropositivity cutoffs are described in Appendix 1.

var2csa Sequencing and 3D Protein Modeling

We used DNA extracted from 50 DBS that were P. falciparum positive by qPCR for Sanger sequencing of var2csa PCR amplification products covering peptides of interest (Appendix 1). Sequence variability with respect to the peptide included in the array was assessed after amino acid alignment, and a 3D model of the DBL1X-ID1 region was developed by using Chimera version 1.5.3 (https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu); Appendix 1).

Definitions and Statistical Analyses

We included in the analysis pregnant women for whom all information was available for IPTp, date of delivery, HIV status, age, parity, and antibody responses. We classified women as primigravid (first pregnancy) or multigravid (>1 previous pregnancy) and categorized age as <20, 20–24, or >25 years (13). Anemia was defined as hemoglobin level at delivery <11 mg/L. We compared proportions by using the Fisher exact test. We used univariate regression models to evaluate the association of log-transformed IgG levels (linear) and seropositivity (logistic) with study periods (2004–2005 and 2010–2012) and country, P. falciparum infection, parity, anemia, and IPTp intervention, taking into account potential confounding variables (HIV and age) in multivariate models. We assessed the modification of the associations by HIV infection or parity by including interaction terms into the regression models. To control the false discovery rate in the selection of antigens, we computed adjusted p values (q-values) by using the Simes procedure (23). We used multilevel mixed-effect linear regression analysis to estimate half-life and time to double (T) IgG levels in the longitudinal cohort of pregnant women from Mozambique (Appendix 1). We identified spatial clusters of P. falciparum infection and seropositivity as well as the most likely hotspots by using the Ward hierarchical cluster analysis and Kulldorff spatial scan method (Appendix 1). We performed statistical analyses by using Stata/SE software version 12.0 (StataCorp, https://www.stata.com), R statistics software version 3.2.1 (https://www.r-project.org), and Graphpad Prism version 6 (https://www.graphpad.com).

Results

Study Participants and P. falciparum Prevalence

Study participants consisted of 2,354 pregnant women (Table; Appendix 1 Figure 2) recruited during 2004–2005 (n = 146) and 2010–2012 (n = 2,208) in the context of IPTp clinical trials (2022). Among them, 993 were from Mozambique, 854 from Benin, 131 from Gabon, 296 from Kenya, 31 from Tanzania, and 49 from Spain. The baseline characteristics of the women selected for this trial were similar to those of the 6,216 women participating in the randomized clinical trials (Appendix 2 Table 1).

The study areas represented 5 sites in sub-Saharan Africa with different intensities of malaria transmission. Prevalence of P. falciparum infection detected by qPCR at delivery, in either peripheral or placental blood (averaged for 2010–2012), among HIV-uninfected women was 46% (332/725) in Benin, 10% (9/89) in Gabon, and 6% (28/452) in Mozambique and among HIV-infected women was 8% (22/273) in Kenya and 4% (13/327) in Mozambique (Table). The prevalence of P. falciparum infection among pregnant women in Mozambique decreased from 25% (37/146) in 2004–2005 to 2% (3/176) in 2010 and increased to 6% (4/72) in 2012. A subset of 239 pregnant women from Mozambique recruited during 2011–2012 was followed during pregnancy; prevalence of P. falciparum infection detected by qPCR was 16% (38/239) at first antenatal visit (mean gestational age ± SD, 20.7 ± 5.45 weeks), 3% (8/239) at the second IPTp administration (25.9 ± 4.98 weeks), and 5% (13/239) at delivery (38.4 ± 2.26 weeks). P. falciparum infection was detected at unscheduled visits for 2% (5/239) of the women. Overall, P. falciparum infection was detected at any of these time points for 21% (49/239) of the women.

P. falciparum–Specific Antibody Profiles and Parasite Exposure during Pregnancy

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Plasmodium falciparum VAR2CSA IgG in malaria-exposed and -nonexposed pregnant women. A) nMFI measured in pregnant women from Mozambique and Spain. Red dashed line represents the mean nMFI from bovine serum albumin + 3 SDs. B) Seroprevalence among pregnant women from Spain (blue) and Mozambique (black). Asterisks indicate antigens recognized by pregnant women from Mozambique at levels above IgG against bovine serum albumin + 3 SDs and above levels in pregnant women from Spain (q-valu

Figure 1. Plasmodium falciparum VAR2CSA IgG in malaria-exposed and -nonexposed pregnant women. A) nMFI measured in pregnant women from Mozambique and Spain. Red dashed line represents the mean nMFI from bovine serum albumin...

Mean antiparasite IgG levels in pregnant women from Mozambique delivering from 2010 through 2012 were above levels against bovine serum albumin plus 3 SD and higher than IgG levels in pregnant women from Spain except for DBL6Ɛ and 3 of 25 VAR2CSA peptides (Figure 1, panel A; Appendix 2 Table 3). Five VAR2CSA peptides, DBL6Ɛ, and pCSP were recognized by IgG from >5% of the pregnant women from Spain who had never been exposed to P. falciparum (Figure 1, panel B), suggesting unspecific recognition; thus, these peptides were excluded from subsequent analysis. To further narrow down the VAR2CSA peptide candidates, we compared IgG levels in pregnant women from Mozambique delivering in 2004–2005 and 2010–2012, a period when P. falciparum prevalence assessed by qPCR at delivery in peripheral or placental blood dropped from 25% to 5% (Figure 1, panel C) (3). This decline in infection rates was mirrored by drops of IgG levels against 10 of the 18 previously selected VAR2CSA peptides (p1, p5, p8, p10, p12, p20, p27, p36, p38, p39) (Figure 1, panel D; Appendix 2 Table 4).

Acquisition and Decay of IgG Responses against VAR2CSA

Figure 2

Thumbnail of IgG responses during pregnancy against selected VAR2CSA antigens and polymorphism in target sequences in serologic study of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women. A) P. falciparum prevalence by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in 239 pregnant women from Mozambique at recruitment, second administration of IPTp, and delivery. Cumulative prevalence at delivery refers to peripheral or placental infection detected by microscopy, qPCR, or histology at any time point. B) Ratio of nMFIs at deliver

Figure 2. IgG responses during pregnancy against selected VAR2CSA antigens and polymorphism in target sequences in serologic study of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women. A) P. falciparum prevalence by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in...

We assessed the dynamics of IgG responses in a longitudinal cohort of 239 pregnant women from Mozambique (Figure 2, panel A). At delivery, compared with uninfected women, the 49 (21%) women infected with P. falciparum during pregnancy had higher IgG levels against the 10 down-selected peptides (Figure 2, panel B; Appendix 2 Table 5). At delivery, seroprevalence rates for p1 (23%), p5 (26%), p8 (26%), and p39 (31%) antibodies were above the cumulative prevalence of P. falciparum infection during pregnancy (Figure 2, panel C; Appendix 2 Table 5). No difference in IgG levels was observed between primigravid and multigravid women (Figure 2, panel D; Appendix 2 Table 5). T after P. falciparum infection ranged from 0.45 years (95% CI 0.31–0.80 years) for p5 to 1.07 years (95% CI 0.60–5.23 years) for p27 (Figure 2, panel E; Appendix 2 Table 6). IgG half-life among seropositive women at recruitment without evidence of P. falciparum infection during follow-up ranged from 0.55 (95% CI 0.38–1.02) years for p8 to 3.66 (95% CI 0.98–∞) years for p1 (Figure 2, panel E; Appendix 2 Table 6). Among recombinant antigens, IgG DBL5Ɛ showed the lowest T (0.31 [95% CI 0.21–0.61] years) and half-life (0.66 [95% CI 0.42–1.65] years), whereas AMA1 IgG showed the highest T (1.76 [95% CI 0.76–∞] years) and half-life (4.18 [95% CI 1.86–∞] years).

Among the down-selected VAR2CSA peptides (p1, p5, p8, and p39), IgG against p5 (51 amino acids) and p8 (48 amino acids) showed the lowest half-lives (0.55 [95% CI 0.38–1.02] years for p8; 1.33 [95% CI 0.65–∞] years for p5) and the largest increase in women exposed to P. falciparum during pregnancy compared with uninfected women (adjusted ratio [AR]p5 2.15 [95% CI 1.39–3.31] and ARp8 2.17 [95% CI 1.46–3.23]; Figure 2, panel B; Appendix 1 Figure 5; Appendix 2 Table 5). IgG levels and seroprevalence rates at delivery for p5 and p8 were higher among pregnant women with active or past malaria infection than among women with no parasite or pigment in the placenta, as assessed by histologic examination (Appendix 2 Table 7). 3D modeling mapped both sequences on the exposed surface of DBL1X-ID1 region of VAR2CSA (Figure 2, panel F). Amino acid variability obtained from 50 P. falciparum isolates collected at study sites was 5% ± 2 SD for p5 sequences and 16% ± 5 SD for p8 sequences, compared with the consensus peptide sequence included in the array (Figure 2, panel G; Appendix 1 Figures 3, 4).

Performance of Selected VAR2CSA Peptides for Assessing Spatial and Temporal Differences in P. falciparum Exposure

Figure 3

Thumbnail of IgG seroprevalence against VAR2CSA selected antigens according to study period, country, anemia status and intermittent preventive treatment group in study of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women. A) Pregnant women from Mozambique delivering during different periods. B) HIV-uninfected pregnant women from Benin, Gabon, Mozambique, and Tanzania. C) HIV-infected pregnant women from Kenya and Mozambique. D) Nonanemic (NA) and anemic (A) pregnant women. E) HIV-uninfected pregnant wome

Figure 3. IgG seroprevalence against VAR2CSA selected antigens according to study period, country, anemia status and intermittent preventive treatment group in the serological study of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women. A) Pregnant women...

In pregnant women from Mozambique at delivery, p5 and p8 seroprevalence rates, as well as the composite of both (p5+8), decreased from 2004–2005 to 2010 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]p5+8 0.27 [95% CI 0.11–0.68]), followed by an increase from 2010 to 2012 (AORp5+8 2.49 [95% CI 1.34–4.61]; Figure 3, panel A; Appendix 2 Table 8). This decrease and subsequent increase mirrored P. falciparum prevalence by qPCR. HIV infection and parity did not modify the associations observed (p value for interaction >0.05 for all cases; Appendix 2 Table 8). Similar to P. falciparum prevalence determined by qPCR, seroprevalence rates were the highest in HIV-uninfected women from Benin, followed by those from Gabon (AORp5+8 0.31 [95% CI 0.21–0.47]) and Mozambique (AORp5+8 0.21 [95% CI 0.16–0.28]; Figure 3, panel B; Appendix 2 Table 9). At delivery, pregnant women living in an area from Tanzania where no P. falciparum infection was detected by qPCR were seronegative for p5, p8, and p5+8 antibodies; 42% were seropositive against AMA1 and 48% were seropositive against MSP119 antibodies (Figure 3, panel B). Among HIV-infected women, seroprevalence rates for p8 and p5+8 were lower in Mozambique than in Kenya (AORp5+8 0.58 [95% CI 0.38–0.88]; Figure 3, panel C; Appendix 2 Table 9). p5 and p5+8 seroprevalence rates were higher among anemic than among nonanemic women (AORp5+8 1.26 [95% CI 1.03–1.55]; Figure 3, panel D; Appendix 2 Table 10). Seroprevalence rates were lower among HIV-uninfected women who received IPTp with mefloquine than among those who received sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (AORp5+8 0.74 [95% CI 0.59–0.94]; Figure 3, panel E; Appendix 2 Table 11). Seroprevalence rates among HIV-infected women were lower among those who received mefloquine than among those who received placebo, although differences were not significant (AORp5+8 0.76 [95% CI 0.50–1.15]; Figure 3, panel F; Appendix 2 Table 11).

Geographic Patterns of P. falciparum Transmission through VAR2CSA Serologic Testing

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum infection and IgG seropositivity in pregnant women living in southern Mozambique. Geographic distribution of seropositive pregnant women (HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected) living in Manhiça District, Mozambique, who delivered during 2010–2012 and for whom microscopy, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and spatial geocoordinates were available. Distribution shows pregnant women with and without P. falciparum infection at delivery, either in periphera

Figure 4. Geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum infection and IgG seropositivity in pregnant women living in southern Mozambique. Geographic distribution of seropositive pregnant women (HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected) living in Manhiça District, Mozambique, who...

Spatial geocoordinates were available for 698 pregnant women from Mozambique residing in Manhiça District (southern Mozambique). Geographic areas experiencing significantly higher seroprevalence rates than would be expected by chance were observed for p5 (radius 2.82 km; p = 0.024) and p5+8 (radius 1.06 km; p = 0.049) but not for MSP119 and AMA1 (Figure 4; Appendix 2 Table 12). The distribution of HIV infection, parity, age, and IPTp was similar among women inside and outside the serologic hotspot (p>0.05; Appendix 2 Table 12).

Discussion

Routine P. falciparum testing of easily accessible pregnant women at maternal healthcare services has the potential to offer a rapid, consistent, and cost-effective method for evaluating the malaria burden in different communities and tracking progress of interventions. IgGs against 2 VAR2CSA peptides, selected according to their ability to maximize the information about recent P. falciparum exposure during pregnancy, reflected differences in malaria burden over time and space in multiple settings in Africa and changes in parasite rates associated with the use of different preventive regimens. Overall, our results indicate that in areas with well-attended maternal healthcare services, this pregnancy-specific serologic test may serve as a useful sentinel surveillance tool for flagging changes in malaria burden and progress in the path toward elimination.

p5 (51 amino acids) is localized in the DBL1X domain and p8 (48 amino acids) in the ID1 region of VAR2CSA. Limited diversity (5%) of p5 sequence was observed in P. falciparum isolates from a variety of regions of Africa, in accordance with estimates from previous studies for the DBL1X domain (24). p8 corresponds to a more diverse (16%) variant of the ID1 region in VAR2CSA (25). Both peptides are exposed on the DBL1X-ID1 N terminal region of VAR2CSA (18,26) and recognized by IgG from malaria-exposed pregnant women at levels higher than those of pregnant women from Spain and men from Mozambique (19). IgG responses against both VAR2CSA peptides increased with P. falciparum infection during pregnancy. Moreover, higher risk for anemia among p5 and p5+8 seroresponders support these antibodies as markers of recent infection, which adversely affects the women’s health (3). In contrast to the slow decay of IgG responses against AMA1, the half-life of IgG against p5 and p8 was <2 years, the average time reported in Mozambique for a second pregnancy to occur (27). The short half-life of p5 and p8 IgG, together with the similar IgG levels in multigravid and primigravid women, suggests that antibodies acquired during one pregnancy are not maintained over multiple pregnancies; thus, antibodies can be used as a reliable indicator of recent exposure for pregnant women, regardless of parity.

Seroprevalence rates for p5, p8, and the composite of both peptides (p5+8) mirrored trends in P. falciparum prevalence among pregnant women from Mozambique delivering during 2004–2012 (3), a temporal pattern that was also observed for PfPR2–10 (28). Trends were similar among HIV-uninfected and infected women, suggesting that impairment of P. falciparum–specific antibody responses driven by viral infection (29) may not affect short-lived IgG responses against p5 and p8. Seroprevalence also reflected the burden of malaria among pregnant women residing in a variety of settings in Africa, as well as reductions in infection rates resulting from the use of mefloquine as IPTp among HIV-uninfected women (21). Similar trends, although not statistically significant, were observed among HIV-infected women receiving cotrimoxazol prophylaxis alone or in combination with mefloquine (22), possibly because of the longer duration of protection provided by 3 IPTp doses in HIV-infected women compared with the 2 doses in HIV-uninfected women. We also found that pregnant women living in an area from Tanzania where no P. falciparum infection was detected by qPCR as well as pregnant women from Spain never exposed to malaria were seronegative against p5 and p8, suggesting that pregnancy-specific serology might be used to confirm the eventual interruption of transmission.

Geographic distribution of pregnant women from Mozambique who were seropositive against p5 and p5+8 revealed a serologic hotspot in an area close to the river and sugar cane plantations, where the density of anopheline mosquitoes can be expected to be higher. In contrast, antibodies against MSP119 and AMA1 were not able to identify these malaria transmission patterns because of saturation of antibody responses after lifelong exposure to P. falciparum. These results support the value of using VAR2CSA serologic testing to amplify signals of recent exposure and suggest its potential to trigger targeted interventions to persons living in close proximity to passively detected seropositive pregnant women.

Our study has several limitations. First, the peptide array we used may have missed some conformational nonlinear epitopes. Second, different transmission dynamics and host genetic factors may affect the acquisition and decay of antibodies (16). Third, steeper decay of antibodies may be observed out of pregnancy when infecting parasites express non-VAR2CSA variants. Fourth, the reduction of data from median fluorescence intensity to seroprevalence to simplify the serologic information of the assay may reduce the depth of serologic information. Developing alternative mathematical models that use antibody levels (30) may increase the sensitivity to detect temporal and spatial changes in malaria transmission. Fifth, small numbers of pregnant women from malaria-free areas in Tanzania and Spain limit the generalizability of our data to support pregnancy-specific serologic testing as a tool to confirm interruption of transmission. Last, antibody assessments in this study were conducted mainly at delivery; further studies should assess the performance of this testing at antenatal visits or soon after delivery (i.e., during infant immunization). Future research is needed to describe the relationship between pregnancy-specific serologic testing and malaria transmission in the general population and its value for confirming interruption of malaria transmission and providing early signals of P. falciparum resurgence after local elimination.

In summary, this study shows that IgG against 2 VAR2CSA peptides from the DBL1X-ID1 domain reveal temporal and spatial differences in malaria burden among pregnant women and reductions in exposure associated with the use of preventive measures during pregnancy. These antibodies enable the identification of local clusters of transmission that are missed by detection of P. falciparum infections. Our results suggest that inferring recent exposure through VAR2CSA serologic testing would amplify signals of ongoing malaria transmission and increase the power to detect changes, either natural or driven by deliberate efforts, as well as malaria hotspots, among pregnant women (2). Moreover, peptides such as p1 targeted by long-lasting IgG responses may be useful for capturing past changes in transmission by sampling women of child-bearing age and relating seroprevalence with the number and timing of previous pregnancies. Operationally suitable serologic tests (31) capable of detecting antibodies against VAR2CSA synthetic peptides may be used in programmatic environments to stratify areas based on malaria burden, measure the effects of interventions, and document year-to-year changes in transmission.

Dr. Fonseca is a doctoral fellow at ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Her research focus includes malaria immune epidemiology in pregnant women and strategies to improve malaria surveillance in disease-endemic regions experiencing a low burden of infection.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the women from Benin, Gabon, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Spain who participated in the study, as well as the staff of the hospitals, clinical officers, field supervisors, and data manager. We also thank Laura Puyol, Diana Barrios, Gemma Moncunill, Pau Cisteró, Lazaro Mussacate, Nelito Ernesto Jose, and Ana Rosa Manhiça for their contribution to the collection and organization of sample shipment and Joe Campo, Aida Valmaseda, Marta Vidal, Eduard Rovira-Vallbona, Pedro Aide, Beatriz Galatas, Patrick G.T. Walker, and Peter Gething for providing important inputs for standardization of the Luminex technology, the design of protein 3D models, the interpretation of results and PfPR2-10 data.

This study was supported by the Malaria Eradication Scientific Alliance; the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership; the Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium; and grants from Banco de Bilbao, Vizcaya, Argentaria Foundation (BBVA 02-0), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PS09/01113, PI13/01478, and CES10/021-I3SNS, to A. Mayor), and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (RYC-2008-02631, to C.D.), the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/51696/2011, to A.M.F.), the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India (SB/OS/PDF-043/2015-16, to H.G.) and the Department d’Universitats I Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR; 2017SGR664, to A.M.).

The Centro de Investigacao em Saude da Manhica receives core support from the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation and Development. The Malaria in Pregnancy Consortium is funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the Malaria Eradication Scientific Alliance is funded by a grant from the Barcelona Institute of Global Health. ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya.

A patent application has been filed for the use of p5 and p8 for serologic surveillance (US 376 patent application no. 62523828, filed on June 23, 2017, by A.M.).

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. The world malaria report. Geneva. Organization. 2018;•••:32.
  2. Mogeni  P, Omedo  I, Nyundo  C, Kamau  A, Noor  A, Bejon  P, et al. on behalf of the Hotspot Group authors. Effect of transmission intensity on hotspots and micro-epidemiology of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa [cited 2019 Aug 2]. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0887-4
  3. Mayor  A, Bardají  A, Macete  E, Nhampossa  T, Fonseca  AM, González  R, et al. Changing trends in P. falciparum burden, immunity, and disease in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:160717. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ndam  NT, Mbuba  E, González  R, Cisteró  P, Kariuki  S, Sevene  E, et al. Resisting and tolerating P. falciparum in pregnancy under different malaria transmission intensities. BMC Med. 2017;15:130. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Willilo  RA, Molteni  F, Mandike  R, Mugalura  FE, Mutafungwa  A, Thadeo  A, et al. Pregnant women and infants as sentinel populations to monitor prevalence of malaria: results of pilot study in Lake Zone of Tanzania. Malar J. 2016;15:392. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Walton  GA. On the control of malaria in Freetown, Sierra Leone; control methods and the effects upon the transmission of Plasmodium falciparum resulting from the reduced abundance of Anopheles gambiae. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1949;43:11739. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. van Eijk  AM, Hill  J, Noor  AM, Snow  RW, ter Kuile  FO. Prevalence of malaria infection in pregnant women compared with children for tracking malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e61728. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ataíde  R, Mayor  A, Rogerson  SJ. Malaria, primigravidae, and antibodies: knowledge gained and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:8594. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brabin  BJ, Romagosa  C, Abdelgalil  S, Menéndez  C, Verhoeff  FH, McGready  R, et al. The sick placenta-the role of malaria. Placenta. 2004;25:35978. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Salanti  A, Staalsoe  T, Lavstsen  T, Jensen  AT, Sowa  MP, Arnot  DE, et al. Selective upregulation of a single distinctly structured var gene in chondroitin sulphate A-adhering Plasmodium falciparum involved in pregnancy-associated malaria. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:17991. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fried  M, Duffy  PE. Adherence of Plasmodium falciparum to chondroitin sulfate A in the human placenta. Science. 1996;272:15024. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Aitken  EH, Mbewe  B, Luntamo  M, Kulmala  T, Beeson  JG, Ashorn  P, et al. Antibody to P. falciparum in pregnancy varies with intermittent preventive treatment regime and bed net use. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29874. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayor  A, Kumar  U, Bardají  A, Gupta  P, Jiménez  A, Hamad  A, et al. Improved pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to malaria with high antibody levels against Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:166474. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Serra-Casas  E, Menéndez  C, Bardají  A, Quintó  L, Dobaño  C, Sigauque  B, et al. The effect of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy on malarial antibodies depends on HIV status and is not associated with poor delivery outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:12331. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bejon  P, Williams  TN, Liljander  A, Noor  AM, Wambua  J, Ogada  E, et al. Stable and unstable malaria hotspots in longitudinal cohort studies in Kenya. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000304. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowkes  FJ, McGready  R, Cross  NJ, Hommel  M, Simpson  JA, Elliott  SR, et al. New insights into acquisition, boosting, and longevity of immunity to malaria in pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:161221. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Drakeley  C, Cook  J. Chapter 5: Potential contribution of sero‐epidemiological analysis for monitoring malaria control and elimination: historical and current perspectives. Adv Parasitol. 2009;69:299–352. PMID: 19622411
  18. Andersen  P, Nielsen  MA, Resende  M, Rask  TS, Dahlbäck  M, Theander  T, et al. Structural insight into epitopes in the pregnancy-associated malaria protein VAR2CSA. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fonseca  AM, Quinto  L, Jiménez  A, González  R, Bardají  A, Maculuve  S, et al. Multiplexing detection of IgG against Plasmodium falciparum pregnancy-specific antigens. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181150. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Menéndez  C, Bardají  A, Sigauque  B, Romagosa  C, Sanz  S, Serra-Casas  E, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnant women in the context of insecticide treated nets delivered through the antenatal clinic. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1934. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. González  R, Mombo-Ngoma  G, Ouédraogo  S, Kakolwa  MA, Abdulla  S, Accrombessi  M, et al. Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with mefloquine in HIV-negative women: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001733. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. González  R, Desai  M, Macete  E, Ouma  P, Kakolwa  MA, Abdulla  S, et al. Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with mefloquine in HIV-infected women receiving cotrimoxazole prophylaxis: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Simes  R. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1986;73:7514. DOIGoogle Scholar
  24. Bockhorst  J, Lu  F, Janes  JH, Keebler  J, Gamain  B, Awadalla  P, et al. Structural polymorphism and diversifying selection on the pregnancy malaria vaccine candidate VAR2CSA. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007;155:10312. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Doritchamou  J, Sabbagh  A, Jespersen  JS, Renard  E, Salanti  A, Nielsen  MA, et al. Identification of a major dimorphic region in the functionally critical N-terminal ID1 domain of VAR2CSA. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137695. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nunes-Silva  S, Gangnard  S, Vidal  M, Vuchelen  A, Dechavanne  S, Chan  S, et al. Llama immunization with full-length VAR2CSA generates cross-reactive and inhibitory single-domain antibodies against the DBL1X domain. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7373. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mandomando  IM, Macete  EV, Ruiz  J, Sanz  S, Abacassamo  F, Vallès  X, et al. Etiology of diarrhea in children younger than 5 years of age admitted in a rural hospital of southern Mozambique. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:5227. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bhatt  S, Weiss  DJ, Cameron  E, Bisanzio  D, Mappin  B, Dalrymple  U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:20711. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Naniche  D, Serra-Casas  E, Bardají  A, Quintó  L, Dobaño  C, Sigauque  B, et al. Reduction of antimalarial antibodies by HIV infection is associated with increased risk of Plasmodium falciparum cord blood infection. J Infect Dis. 2012;205:56877. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sepúlveda  N, Stresman  G, White  MT, Drakeley  CJ. Current mathematical models for analyzing anti-malarial antibody data with an eye to malaria elimination and eradication. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:738030. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Welch  RJ, Anderson  BL, Litwin  CM. Rapid immunochromatographic strip test for detection of anti-K39 immunoglobulin G antibodies for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:14834. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2510.181177

Original Publication Date: August 30, 2019

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Alfredo Mayor, ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer Rosselló 153 (CEK Bldg), E-08036 Barcelona, Spain

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 17, 2019
Page updated: September 17, 2019
Page reviewed: September 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external