Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 9—September 2020
Dispatch

Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 7 RNA and Antibody Kinetics in Naturally Infected Dromedary Calves, United Arab Emirates

Victor M. CormanComments to Author , Peter Nagy, Stefanie Ostermann, Jacqueline Arloth, Anne Liljander, Rajib Barua, Aungshuman Das Gupta, Fatima Hakimuddin, Judit Juhasz, Ulrich Wernery, and Christian Drosten
Author affiliations: Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. (V.M. Corman, C. Drosten); German Centre for Infection Research, Berlin (V.M. Corman, C. Drosten); Emirates Industries for Camel Milk and Products, Dubai, United Arab Emirates (P. Nagy, R. Barua, A. Das Gupta, J. Juhasz); Institute of Experimental Immunology, Lübeck, Germany (S. Ostermann, J. Arloth, A. Liljander); Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Dubai (F. Hakimuddin, U. Wernery)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Orthohepevirus A genotype 7 is a novel zoonotic variant of hepatitis E virus. To clarify infection in the animal reservoir, we virologically monitored 11 dromedary dam–calf pairs. All calves became infected during the first 6 months of life and cleared the virus after an average of 2 months. Dams did not become infected.

Infection with hepatitis E viruses (HEVs) is one of the major causes of acute hepatitis in humans (1). Most HEV strains infecting humans belong to the virus species Orthohepevirus A (HEV-A) (2). HEV-A comprises 8 genotypes; genotypes 1–4 and 7 are found in humans. HEV-A genotypes 1 and 2 seem to be restricted to humans. The other 3 genotypes have also been detected in animals, including pigs (genotypes 3 and 4) and camelids (genotype 7) (1).

The most likely source of human zoonotic HEV infection is consumption of contaminated food. Typically, human HEV infections lead to acute and self‐limiting disease or asymptomatic seroconversion, but chronic hepatitis E has also been reported, mainly in transplant recipients (3,4). Infection with camel-associated HEV-A genotype 7 was reported in a patient from the United Arab Emirates with chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation (4,5). This infection was likely acquired through consumption of contaminated camel products. Despite the risk for zoonotic transmission, data about shedding and immunity of HEV-A genotype 7 infection in naturally infected dromedaries are scarce.

The Study

We investigated HEV-A RNA and specific antibody levels in dromedary calves and corresponding dams from 1 farm at monthly intervals over the course of the calves’ first year of life. We included serum samples from 11 dam–calf pairs in the United Arab Emirates. The farm contained ≈4,500 camels. The 11 dam–calf pairs investigated in this study were kept in different fenced compartments within 100–150 m of each other but were housed together with other dam–calf pairs in the same paddock throughout lactation (6). All calves were born during June 2014. Serum samples were obtained during the first week and then at monthly intervals until 1 year after birth.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of HEV RNA and HEV antibodies in 11 dromedary calves, United Arab Emirates. Gray lines indicate HEV RNA concentration in serum, and orange lines indicate antibody levels. HEV, hepatitis E virus; OD, optical density.

Figure 1. HEV RNA and HEV antibodies in 11 dromedary calves, United Arab Emirates. Gray lines indicate HEV RNA concentration in serum, and orange lines indicate antibody levels. HEV, hepatitis E virus; OD,...

We tested samples for HEV RNA by using 2 reverse transcription PCRs (RT-PCRs) and for HEV antibodies by an HEV-A genotype 7 IgG ELISA (Appendix). In the studied cohort, all calves were naturally infected by HEV-A, as confirmed by RNA detection in serum samples, or seroconversion. In 9 of the 11 calves (#1–#9) (Figure 1), HEV-A RNA was detected in >1 serum sample. In 2 calves (#10 and #11) no RNA was detected, but an increase in ELISA ratio, equivalent to seroconversion, confirmed recent HEV-A infection.

The average age for infection of calves was 4.6 months (range 1–6 months). All HEV-A–RNA positive calves cleared the virus from their blood and showed accompanying seroconversion (Figure 1). Average viremia was 2.1 months (range 1–4 months). Viral RNA concentrations in serum samples ranged from 6.6 × 102 IU/mL to 2.3 × 106 IU/mL (mean 4.6 × 105 IU/mL).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree of open reading frame 1 of HEV RNA sequences from 11 camel calves (bold), United Arab Emirates, and other Orthohepevirus A genotype 7 sequences available in GenBank as of May 1, 2019. The tree was calculated by using MrBayes (http://mrbayes.sourceforge.net) and a generalized time reversible substitution model. One million generations were sampled every 500 steps, and 20% of trees were discarded as burn-in. Bold indicates sequences obtained during this study. An Ort

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of open reading frame 1 of HEV RNA sequences from 11 camel calves (bold), United Arab Emirates, and other Orthohepevirus A genotype 7 sequences available in GenBank as of...

Phylogenetic analysis of partial open reading frame 1 region sequences confirmed that all strains belong to HEV-A genotype 7 (Figure 2). Sequences described clustered with a clade of HEV-A sequences obtained from camels and a human patient, all from the United Arab Emirates. All new sequences were highly similar and had 0–3 nt exchanges in the 283-nt fragment, which is consistent with the epidemiologic link of all infections and might indicate a common source of infection on this farm.

We compared novel sequences with all other camel associated HEV-A genotype 7 sequences available in GenBank (as of June 1, 2019). The novel sequences differ by 6.0% to 20.6% nt content within the partial open reading frame 1 region.

We found that none of the corresponding serum samples from dams were positive for HEV-A-RNA at any time or showed seroconversion during the study. We also found that 6/9 dams showed reactivity at the time of parturition by using the applied HEV-A genotype 7 ELISA and remained reactive through the year, and the other 3 dams remained nonreactive during the study.

ELISA reactivity for all calves decreased after infection, and 2 of the 11 calves became negative (#8 and #11) (Figure 1). These 2 calves were the ones that had earliest infection date and the longest time span between infection and last available serum sample. To what extent the decrease of antibody levels is associated with a decreasing immunity against HEV-A genotype 7 was not investigated but should be the subject of future studies.

The observed natural course of HEV-A genotype 7 infection in camels is similar to that for HEV-A genotype 3 in pigs. Pigs represent the zoonotic source of most human HEV infections in the Northern Hemisphere (7). In piglets, HEV-A genotype 3 infection usually occurs at the age of 2–3 months, coinciding with the decrease in levels of maternal antibodies (8). HEV-A RNA is present in blood for »1–2 weeks, but longer periods <12 weeks have been described (9). Similarly, in our study of camels, all calves became infected within the first 6 months, and the duration of the viremia was an average of 8 weeks. Prevalence of HEV RNA in pigs at slaughter, which usually takes place at the age of 5–8 months, was found to be high, with <10% viral RNA detection in blood and <50% viral RNA detection in feces (7,10,11). As camels are slaughtered at higher age (»2 years of age even in industrial farming) (12), a lower risk for HEV transmission associated with meat production might apply to camels in comparison with pigs.

The absence of RNA detection in dams suggests immunity in adult animals. The lack of detected HEV infection in 3 seronegative dams, despite close contact with their infected calves, points to additional factors, such as a T-cell–mediated immunity that might protect against HEV infection. This hypothesis is emphasized by simultaneous detection of antibodies and virus RNA in some calves and suggests that not all antibodies provide sterile immunity. This finding becomes essential when one considers intervention strategies, such as vaccination. Nevertheless, the time of seroconversion coincides with the time of decreasing viremia and infection clearance. A similar pattern of virus versus antibody findings has been found for pigs, humans, and hares (8,1315).

The observation that all investigated calves were infected in the first year of life indicates a highly active enzootic infection pattern. The virus seems to be widespread in the studied herd and could therefore be widely associated with dromedaries. Because calves have contact with other calves on farms, the infection cycle is probably maintained by calf-to-calf transmission. This factor is relevant because humans are rarely in contact with camel calves but make intensive use of adult animals and derived products. However, our study was conducted in an industrial farming context. Different infection patterns with infection at higher age might be observed in husbandries that involve lower densities of animals and might also vary in other husbandry practices.

Conclusions

We provide essential information regarding age of infection, virus shedding, and immunity for camel-associated, zoonotic HEV-A genotype 7. Knowledge about the distribution of a zoonotic virus in its animal reservoir is needed to mitigate risks of acquisition along the husbandry and production chain. Intervention by vaccination will need to target calves at a time when they are still coreared with dams. Risks for the general human population seem to be low because humans are rarely in contact with camel calves unless directly involved in camel breeding. Future studies should investigate age-associated infection patterns in less industrialized forms of camel husbandry and the actual risk for transmission to humans when animals are slaughtered.

Dr. Corman is a physician and virologist at the Institute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. His research interests are characterization of emerging viruses and development of diagnostic tools.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Tobias Bleicker, Sebastian Brünink, and Philip El-Duah for providing excellent assistance.

This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Health (grant ZMVI1-2518FSB705 to V.M.C.) and a grant from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (contract no. 81195004 to V.M.C. and A.L.).

Top

References

  1. Rasche  A, Sander  AL, Corman  VM, Drexler  JF. Evolutionary biology of human hepatitis viruses. J Hepatol. 2019;70:50120. DOIPubMed
  2. Purdy  MA, Harrison  TJ, Jameel  S, Meng  XJ, Okamoto  H, Van der Poel  WHM, et al.; Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Hepeviridae. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:26456. DOIPubMed
  3. Behrendt  P, Steinmann  E, Manns  MP, Wedemeyer  H. The impact of hepatitis E in the liver transplant setting. J Hepatol. 2014;61:141829. DOIPubMed
  4. Lee  GH, Tan  BH, Teo  EC, Lim  SG, Dan  YY, Wee  A, et al. Chronic infection with camelid hepatitis E virus in a liver-transplant recipient who regularly consumes camel meat and milk. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:3557.e3. DOIPubMed
  5. Rasche  A, Saqib  M, Liljander  AM, Bornstein  S, Zohaib  A, Renneker  S, et al. Hepatitis E virus infection in dromedaries, north and east Africa, United Arab Emirates, and Pakistan, 1983–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:124952. DOIPubMed
  6. Meyer  B, Juhasz  J, Barua  R, Das Gupta  A, Hakimuddin  F, Corman  VM, et al. Time course of MERS-CoV infection and immunity in dromedary camels. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:21713. DOIPubMed
  7. Pavio  N, Doceul  V, Bagdassarian  E, Johne  R. Recent knowledge on hepatitis E virus in Suidae reservoirs and transmission routes to human. Vet Res (Faisalabad). 2017;48:78. DOIPubMed
  8. Salines  M, Andraud  M, Rose  N. From the epidemiology of hepatitis E virus (HEV) within the swine reservoir to public health risk mitigation strategies: a comprehensive review. Vet Res (Faisalabad). 2017;48:31. DOIPubMed
  9. Sanford  BJ, Dryman  BA, Huang  YW, Feagins  AR, Leroith  T, Meng  XJ. Prior infection of pigs with a genotype 3 swine hepatitis E virus (HEV) protects against subsequent challenges with homologous and heterologous genotypes 3 and 4 human HEV. Virus Res. 2011;159:1722. DOIPubMed
  10. Leblanc  D, Ward  P, Gagné  MJ, Poitras  E, Müller  P, Trottier  YL, et al. Presence of hepatitis E virus in a naturally infected swine herd from nursery to slaughter. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;117:1606. DOIPubMed
  11. Krog  JS, Larsen  LE, Breum  SO. Tracing hepatitis E virus in pigs from birth to slaughter. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:50. DOIPubMed
  12. Kadim  IT, Mahgoub  O, Faye  B, Farouk  MM. Camel meat and meat products. Wallingford (UK): Centre for Agricultural and Bioscience International; 2013.
  13. Baylis  SA, Crossan  C, Corman  VM, Blümel  J, Scobie  L, Dalton  HR. Unusual serological response to hepatitis E virus in plasma donors consistent with re-infection. Vox Sang. 2015;109:4069. DOIPubMed
  14. Schlosser  J, Eiden  M, Vina-Rodriguez  A, Fast  C, Dremsek  P, Lange  E, et al. Natural and experimental hepatitis E virus genotype 3-infection in European wild boar is transmissible to domestic pigs. Vet Res (Faisalabad). 2014;45:121. DOIPubMed
  15. Corman  VM, Hilgensloh  L, Voigt  U, Marklewitz  M, Siebert  U, Drosten  C, et al. Hepatitis E virus infection in European brown hares, Germany, 2007–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:12335. DOIPubMed

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2609.191758

Original Publication Date: July 29, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 9—September 2020

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Victor M. Corman, Institute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Helmut-Ruska-Haus Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: May 04, 2020
Page updated: August 19, 2020
Page reviewed: August 19, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external