Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 2—February 2021
Research Letter

Long-Term Humoral Immune Response in Persons with Asymptomatic or Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Vietnam

Huynh Kim MaiComments to Author , Nguyen Bao Trieu, Trinh Hoang Long, Hoang Tien Thanh, Nguyen Dinh Luong, Le Xuan Huy, Lam Anh Nguyet, Dinh Nguyen Huy Man, Danielle E. Anderson, Tran Tan Thanh, Nguyen Van Vinh Chau, Guy Thwaites, Lin-Fa Wang, Le Van TanComments to Author , and Do Thai Hung
Author affiliations: Pasteur Institute, Nha Trang City, Vietnam (H.K. Mai, N.B. Trieu, T.H. Long, H.T. Thanh, N.D. Luong, L.X. Huy, D.T. Hung); Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (L.A. Nguyet, T.T. Thanh, G. Thwaites, L.V. Tan); Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City (D.N.H. Man, N.V.V. Chau); Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (D.E. Anderson, L.-F. Wang); Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (G. Thwaites); SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore (L.-F. Wang)

Cite This Article


Antibody response against nucleocapsid and spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 in 11 persons with mild or asymptomatic infection rapidly increased after infection. At weeks 18–30 after diagnosis, all remained seropositive but spike protein–targeting antibody titers declined. These data may be useful for vaccine development.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic (1). Effective vaccines are vital for mitigating the impact of the pandemic. As such, synthesizing a long-term humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 remains essential to developing and implementing a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We report a longitudinal study of 11 persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vietnam, in which we monitored antibody responses for up to 30 weeks after infection.

We included patients with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a COVID-19 treatment center in central Vietnam during January–March 2020. To enable long-term follow-up, we excluded all short-term visitors. We collected information from each participant about clinical status, travel history, contacts with persons with confirmed cases, and personal demographics. For plasma collection, we applied a flexible sampling schedule encompassing 30 weeks after diagnosis, stratified by collection at 1, 2–3, 4–7, and ≥18 weeks after diagnosis.

We measured antibodies against 2 main immunogens of SARS-CoV-2, the nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins, by using 2 well-validated sensitive and specific serologic assays, Elecsys Anti–SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche, (2) and SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) (GenScript, (3). The former is an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay that uses recombinant N protein for qualitative detection of pan Ig, including IgG, against SARS-CoV-2. The latter is a surrogate assay for measuring receptor-binding domain–targeting neutralizing antibodies (RBD-targeting NAbs) (3,4), in principle a blocking ELISA that quantifies antibodies that block the receptor–RBD interaction (3). Our study forms part of the national COVID-19 response and was approved by the institutional review board of the Pasteur Institute in Nha Trang, Vietnam.

During the study period, there were a total of 23 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in central Vietnam. Ten were tourists and were thus excluded from the study. Of the remaining 13, a total of 11 consented to participate in this study. Among study participants, 6 were female and 5 were male; the age range was 12–64 years (Table). Seven experienced mildly symptomatic infection and did not require supplemental oxygen during hospitalization; 4 were asymptomatic. Before becoming ill, 3 had traveled to a SARS-CoV-2–endemic country, including patients 2 and 3, who had traveled to Malaysia and patient 4 had traveled to the United States. Patient 4 transmitted the virus to 6 of her contacts, including 4 family members and 2 employees. Of these, 2 transmitted the virus to another family member (Table; Appendix Figure).


Antibody responses in 11 study participants, weeks 1–20 after PCR diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Vietnam, 2020. A) Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among 11 COVID-19 patients. We followed testing protocols and the positive cutoff of 20% recommended in the Elecsys Anti–SARS-CoV-2 assay (Roche, without any modification. Using these parameters, previous studies showed an excellent concordance between results from surrogate virus neutralization tests and conventional neutralizing antibody detection assays (3,4). Vertical bars denote 95% CIs. Graphs were created using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad software, B) Kinetics of neutralizing antibodies measured by the surrogate neutralization assay (GenScript, with the 20% cutoff applied. We tested samples at 1:10 dilution as specified. Because of the limited availability of plasma samples, each sample was tested only once. RBD, receptor-binding domain; NAbs, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies; S, spike; N, nucleocapsid.

Figure. Antibody responses in 11 study participants, weeks 1–20 after PCR diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Vietnam, 2020. A) Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among 11 COVID-19 patients. We followed testing protocols and the...

We collected 43 plasma samples from 11 participants within 4 time ranges after diagnosis: <1 week (n = 10), weeks 2–3 (n=11), weeks 4–7 (n=11), and weeks 18–30 (n = 11). During the first week after diagnosis, 1 patient (1/10, 10%) had detectable RBD-targeting NAbs, and none had antibodies against N protein. In subsequent weeks, all (100%) participants tested positive by surrogate virus neutralization. Antibodies against N protein were detected in 10/11 (91%) of the samples collected between the second and third weeks after diagnosis and 11/11 (100%) samples collected at subsequent time points (Figure, panel A).

Previous studies have demonstrated that the inhibition percentage measured by surrogate virus neutralization tests correlates well with neutralizing antibody titers measured by conventional virus neutralization assays or plaque-reduction neutralization tests (3,4). In our study, the inhibition percentage was below the assay cutoff in all but 1 plasma sample taken during the first week after diagnosis and then rapidly increased above the assay cutoff at subsequent time points. At weeks 18–30 after diagnosis, the inhibition percentage declined but remained detectable (Figure, panel B).

We demonstrate that antibodies against 2 main structural proteins (S and N) of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with asymptomatic or mild infections were almost undetectable within the first week after diagnosis. Antibodies rapidly increased in subsequent weeks and peaked around weeks 4–7 before declining during the later phase of infection, consistent with previously reported findings (2,57). However, few studies have reported the persistence of long-term humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 up to 18–30 weeks after diagnosis (5), especially among mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic infected patients.

The titers of RBD-targeting NAbs, which are well correlated with those of neutralizing antibodies, decayed by weeks 18–30 after infection, suggesting that humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection may not be long lasting. Because neutralizing antibodies are recognized as a surrogate for protection (79), follow-up studies beyond this period are needed to more conclusively determine the durability of these long-term responses and their correlation with protection.

Our collective findings offer insights into the long-term humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The data might have implications for COVID-19 vaccine development and implementation and other public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ms. Mai is vice-head of the virology department of the Pasteur Institute in Nha Trang City, Vietnam. She has been part of a team responsible for COVID-19 diagnostics in an area of central Vietnam with a population of ≈25 million people.



We thank the patients for their participations in this study and the diagnostic team at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Le Nguyen Truc Nhu, Nguyen Thi Thu Hong for laboratory support.

This study was funded by the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Field Epidemiology of Training Programmes. L.V.T. and G.T. are supported by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain (204904/Z/16/Z and 106680/B/14/Z, respectively). The serology work at Duke-NUS is supported by grants from the National Medical Research Council, Singapore (STPRG-FY19-001 and COVID19RF-003).



  1. Zhu  N, Zhang  D, Wang  W, Li  X, Yang  B, Song  J, et al.; China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:72733. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen  SY, Lee  YL, Lin  YC, Lee  NY, Liao  CH, Hung  YP, et al. Multicenter evaluation of two chemiluminescence and three lateral flow immunoassays for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and assessment of antibody dynamic responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Taiwan. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:215768. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tan  CW, Chia  WN, Qin  X, Liu  P, Chen  MI, Tiu  C, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein-protein interaction. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:10738. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Perera  RAPM, Ko  R, Tsang  OTY, Hui  DSC, Kwan  MYM, Brackman  CJ, et al. Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test for detection of antibody in human, canine, cat and hamster sera. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;JCM.02504-20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gudbjartsson  DF, Norddahl  GL, Melsted  P, Gunnarsdottir  K, Holm  H, Eythorsson  E, et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:172434. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sun  B, Feng  Y, Mo  X, Zheng  P, Wang  Q, Li  P, et al. Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgM and IgG responses in COVID-19 patients. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:9408. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Folegatti  PM, Ewer  KJ, Aley  PK, Angus  B, Becker  S, Belij-Rammerstorfer  S, et al.; Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:46778. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. van Doremalen  N, Lambe  T, Spencer  A, Belij-Rammerstorfer  S, Purushotham  JN, Port  JR, et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature. 2020;586:57882. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng  W, Bao  L, Liu  J, Xiao  C, Liu  J, Xue  J, et al. Primary exposure to SARS-CoV-2 protects against reinfection in rhesus macaques. Science. 2020;369:81823. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.204226

Original Publication Date: January 20, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 2—February 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Huynh Kim Mai, 8-9-10 Tran Phu, Xuong Huan Ward, Nha Trang City, Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 13, 2020
Page updated: January 24, 2021
Page reviewed: January 24, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.