Volume 28, Number 4—April 2022
Recurrent SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection after COVID-19 Illness Onset during Pregnancy
The Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Mothers and Babies Network conducts longitudinal surveillance of pregnant persons in the United States with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection during pregnancy. Of 6,551 infected pregnant persons in this analysis, 142 (2.2%) had positive RNA tests >90 days and up to 416 days after infection.
Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in respiratory specimens that recurs over extended time intervals might indicate viral RNA persistence, continued viral replication, reinfection, or sample testing error (1). Although SARS-CoV-2 infections are generally acute, persistent detection of RNA in upper respiratory specimens has been described with a mean duration of 17 days and detectable RNA for up to 12 weeks after symptom onset among recovered patients (2–5). Virus detection has been reported in severely immunocompromised patients beyond 20 days and up to 143 days after an initial positive SARS-CoV-2 test result (3,4). SARS-CoV-2 reinfections documented through whole-genome sequencing are rare (6).
Immunologic changes during pregnancy might increase risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, susceptibility to severe illness, and viral shedding (7). A cohort study identified several pregnant persons who tested positive 90 days after an initial positive test (8). The objective of our study was to describe demographic and clinical characteristics overall and by recurrent test–positive status in a convenience sample of pregnant persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection laboratory confirmed by molecular amplification detection testing (9). This exploratory analysis includes data reported from 21 jurisdictions to the Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Mothers and Babies Network; first positive reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) results during pregnancy occurred during March 29, 2020–December 31, 2020, with data reported through September 3, 2021.
We enrolled pregnant persons who met our inclusion criteria (Appendix). We defined persons with an RT-PCR–positive respiratory specimen collected >90 days after symptom onset as recurrent positive (RP) independent of the presence of any intermittent RT-PCR–negative specimens. Persons who did not meet the RP definition were labeled not recurrent (NR). However, not all persons received follow-up testing, and additional laboratory results were voluntarily reported. Duration of RT-PCR positivity was defined as the number of days from symptom onset until the last known positive RT-PCR in a respiratory specimen. Duration of RNA shedding was defined as the number of days from symptom onset until the second consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 result by RT-PCR among pregnant persons reported with a follow-up test. Testing was not routine, and this factor likely will overestimate length of RNA shedding.
Among 6,551 pregnant persons (median age 29 years; 39.7% non-Hispanic White) in our analysis, 17.5% had first trimester infections, 35.5% second, and 47.0% third (Table). Median duration of RT-PCR positivity was 3 days (range 0–416 days). Overall, we collected 9,985 respiratory specimens with RT-PCR results (which could include multiple positive, negative, or indeterminate results per person); 12.5% of specimens tested 90 days after initial symptom onset were positive (158/1,257 specimens) and 9.2% of specimens tested 330 days after initial symptom onset were positive (6/65 specimens). Median duration of documented RNA shedding per person was 130 days (range 0–441 days; n = 458).
Overall, 142 persons (2.2%) from 14 jurisdictions met the RP definition. Among 6,409 NR persons, 727 (11.3%) were RT-PCR–negative after 90 days; 5,682 (88.6%) did not have any known RT-PCR results after 90 days. Several RPs were positive by RT-PCR in respiratory specimens for up to 330 days after symptom onset (Figure). Comparing RP to NR persons identified small differences in age group, race/ethnicity, and trimester of infection (Table). A higher percentage of RPs (33.8%) than NRs (28.2%) were 30–34 years of age. Non-Hispanic White persons made up 39.8% of NRs compared with 31.7% of RPs; most RPs were Hispanic (33.8%) and non-Hispanic Black (18.3%). Most RPs had second trimester infections (67.6%), whereas most NRs had third trimester infections (47.8%).
Our study’s first limitation is that SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequencing was not reported; reinfection could not be distinguished from recurrent viral shedding. A positive RT-PCR result alone without other information (data on symptom onset, cycle threshold, or viral culture) cannot distinguish infectious virus from noninfectious genomic fragments. Second, health departments were not required to send laboratory testing beyond the first positive result that occurred during pregnancy; these findings are from a convenience sample of pregnant persons with varied duration of follow-up and do not estimate the actual extent of recurrent positivity. Furthermore, persons with infections earlier in pregnancy might be more likely to be classified as RP, given that they can be followed longer and receive additional COVID-19 testing compared with persons with initial symptom onset later in pregnancy. Last, only 31.4% of our cohort (n = 2,062) had multiple test results, representing a small proportion of pregnant persons.
The findings of this report suggest that specimens from pregnant persons diagnosed with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections might be recurrently positive for up to 416 days after symptom onset. Future prospective cohort studies among pregnant persons with SARS-CoV-2 testing should be performed over consistent lengths of time, distinguish infectious viral shedding from noninfectious recurrent positive PCR results, and examine risk of reinfection during pregnancy given the recent emergence of new coronavirus disease variants. Longitudinal surveillance of pregnant persons with COVID-19 can be used for hypothesis generation, in addition to monitoring the impact of infection on pregnancy and infant outcomes.
Dr. Griffin is a contracted epidemiologist with Eagle Global Scientific, LLC, in the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Her primary research interest is emerging infectious diseases.
We thank our Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Mothers and Babies Network (SET-NET) jurisdictional partners: California Department of Public Health (Valorie Eckert, Barbara Warmerdam, Similoluwa Sowunmi, Olga Barer), Georgia Department of Public Health (J. Michael Bryan, Cristina Meza, Victoria Sanon, Teri’ Willabus, Cynthia Carpentieri, Michael Andrews, Sashawn Lawrence, Camille Millar), Houston Health Department, Iowa Department of Public Health, Kansas Department of Public Health, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (Umme-Aiman Halai, Caleb Lu, Emily Barnes, Alison Ryan, Nina Mykhaylov), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (Eirini Nestoridi, Hanna Shephard, Mahsa Yazdy, Catherine Brown), Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Minnesota Department of Health, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (Tyler Faulkner, Samir Koirala, Ronda Simpson, Shannon Lawrence), Nevada Department of Health and Human Services, New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (Shoshana Merzel), New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, New York State Department of Health (Zahra S. Alaali, Nadia Thomas, Pauline Santos), Pennsylvania Department of Health, Philadelphia Department of Public Health (My-Phuong Huynh), Puerto Rico Department of Health (Camille Delgado-López, Mariam Marcano-Huertas, Leishla Nieves-Ferrer), South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Tennessee Department of Health (Lindsey Sizemore, Heather Wingate), US Virgin Islands Department of Health, and Washington State Department of Health. We would also like to acknowledge our colleagues in the COVID-19 Pregnancy and Infant Linked Outcomes Team (PILOT) (Elizabeth Lewis, Amanda Akosa, Nicki Roth, Christina Sancken, Megan Reynolds).
- Tang X, Musa SS, Zhao S, He D. Reinfection or reactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: a systematic review. Front Public Health. 2021;9:
663045. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cevik M, Tate M, Lloyd O, Enrico Maraolo A, Schafers J, Ho A. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2:e13–22. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Coyle P, Malek JA, Ahmed AA, Mohamoud YA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positivity protects against reinfection for at least seven months with 95% efficacy. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;35:
100861. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi B, Choudhary MC, Regan J, Sparks JA, Padera RF, Qiu X, et al. Persistence and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in an immunocompromised host. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2291–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidance on ending isolation and precautions for adults with COVID-19. 2021 Mar 16 [cited 2021 Jun 28]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html
- Rodríguez-Grande C, Alcalá L, Estévez A, Sola-Campoy PJ, Buenestado-Serrano S, Martínez-Laperche C, et al.; Gregorio Marañón Microbiology-ID COVID 19 Study Group2. Systematic genomic and clinical analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reinfections and recurrences involving the same strain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:85–94. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donders F, Lonnée-Hoffmann R, Tsiakalos A, Mendling W, Martinez de Oliveira J, Judlin P, et al. Isidog Covid-Guideline Workgroup. ISIDOG recommendations concerning COVID-19 and pregnancy. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10:243. DOIGoogle Scholar
- Dubelbeiss E, Silverberg M, White C, Jaspan D, Goldberg J, Haines C. Repeat positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019) testing ≥90 days apart in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3:
100331. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woodworth KR, Reynolds MR, Burkel V, Gates C, Eckert V, McDermott C, et al. A preparedness model for mother-baby linked longitudinal surveillance for emerging threats. Matern Child Health J. 2021;25:198–206. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
TableCite This Article
Original Publication Date: February 25, 2022
Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 4—April 2022
|EID Search Options|
|Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.|
|Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.|
|Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Kate R. Woodworth, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Mailstop S 106-3, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA