Volume 28, Number 7—July 2022
Research
Measuring Basic Reproduction Number to Assess Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 Transmission
Table 1
Parameter | Model |
|
---|---|---|
1-phase | 2-phase | |
β | 0.38 (0.30–0.60) | NA |
β1 | NA | 1.28 (0.76–2.40) |
β2 |
NA |
0.19 (0.10–0.30) |
R0† | 2.6 (2.0–4.1) | NA |
R0 before | NA | 8.72 (5.14–16.32) |
R0 after | NA | 1.33 (0.68–2.04) |
R0 combined |
NA |
5.72 (3.62–8.70) |
Intervention efficacy‡ | NA | 0.85 (0.66–0.94) |
tinit |
−22 (−39 to −4) |
−4 (−25 to −1) |
AIC | 657.33 | 628.85 |
*The value of Einit was fixed at day 1 and the value of tinflect at day 12. The R0 values were calculated by using equations 4 and 5 (Appendix). AIC, Akaike information criterion; NA, not applicable; R0, basic reproduction number; β, current transmission rate per day; β1, transmission rate per day before inflection date; β2, transmission rate per day after inflection date; Einit, number of initial infections at date tinit; R0, basic reproduction number; tinit, date on which the initial infection occurs. †R0 was calculated before and after inflection date in the 2-phase model. ‡The intervention efficacy was calculated as 1 – β2/β1. Days for tinit are relative to the first positive sample on day 1.
1These authors were co-principal investigators.
2Members of the workgroup are listed at the end of this article.