Volume 28, Number 7—July 2022
Research
Measuring Basic Reproduction Number to Assess Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 Transmission
Table 2
Characteristics and parameter estimates in hospital wards in a long-term care facility in France used to estimate nosocomial transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2*
Ward | No. beds | Total no. patients | Day of first positive case | No. cases | β | R0† | tinit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A2 | 48 | 62 | 11 | 30 | 1.29 (0.51–NE) | 8.76 (3.47–NE) | 2 (−14 to 29) |
C0 | 37 | 74 | 16 | 22 | 0.56 (0.22–NE) | 3.79 (1.50–NE) | 4 (−39 to 9) |
C2 | 37 | 48 | 7 | 15 | 2.13 (0.29–NE) | 14.46 (1.97–NE) | −8 (−39 to –14) |
C3 | 37 | 63 | 24 | 7 | 0.42 (0.11–1.30) | 2.87 (0.75–8.84) | 19 (−9 to 21) |
*Estimates and 95% CI for β, R0, and tinit are from the fitting the 1-phase model to data from each ward (Einit = 1). In many instances, the upper bound of the 95% CI for β, and in the most likely value of β for some wards, could not be estimated due to a flat likelihood surface, in which case the value is given as NE. NE, not estimated; β, current transmission rate per day; Einit, number of initial infections at date tinit; R0, basic reproduction number; tinit, date on which the initial infection occurs. †The R0 values were calculated using equation 4 (Appendix).
1These authors were co-principal investigators.
2Members of the workgroup are listed at the end of this article.