Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025
Research

Surveillance Strategy in Duck Flocks Vaccinated against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus

Sophie Planchand, Timothée VergneComments to Author , Jean-Luc Guérin, Séverine Rautureau, Guillaume Gerbier, and Sébastien Lambert
Author affiliation: National Veterinary School of Toulouse, Toulouse, France (S. Planchand, T. Vergne, J.-L. Guérin, S. Lambert); French Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forestry, Paris, France (S. Rautureau, G. Gerbier)

Main Article

Table 1

Description of surveillance strategies used in duck flocks vaccinated against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus*

Surveillance strategy
Description
Case definition assumed to trigger an alert
Additional information
Passive
P1 Daily proportion of dead ducks found on the farm Daily percentage of dead ducks exceeds a predefined threshold Thresholds used: 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.5%
P2 Weekly proportion of dead ducks found on the farm Weekly percentage of dead ducks exceeds a predefined threshold Thresholds used: 0.5%, 1%, and 3%
P3
Ratio of the daily influenza mortality to the natural daily mortality
Ratio exceeds a predefined threshold
Thresholds used: 5×, 10×, and 20× natural daily mortality
Enhanced passive
RT-PCR testing of a predefined number of randomly selected dead ducks or of all dead ducks if less than the predefined number, at predefined intervals
At least 1 selected dead duck tested positive
Intervals used: 7 and 14 d; no. selected dead ducks: 3, 5, and 7
Active RT-PCR testing of 60 live ducks randomly sampled at predefined intervals At least 1 selected live duck tested positive Intervals used:
20, 30, and 40 d

*RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR.

Main Article

Page created: December 02, 2024
Page updated: December 22, 2024
Page reviewed: December 22, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external