Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.
Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025
Research
Surveillance Strategy in Duck Flocks Vaccinated against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus
Table 1
Surveillance strategy |
Description |
Case definition assumed to trigger an alert |
Additional information |
---|---|---|---|
Passive | |||
P1 | Daily proportion of dead ducks found on the farm | Daily percentage of dead ducks exceeds a predefined threshold | Thresholds used: 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.5% |
P2 | Weekly proportion of dead ducks found on the farm | Weekly percentage of dead ducks exceeds a predefined threshold | Thresholds used: 0.5%, 1%, and 3% |
P3 |
Ratio of the daily influenza mortality to the natural daily mortality |
Ratio exceeds a predefined threshold |
Thresholds used: 5×, 10×, and 20× natural daily mortality |
Enhanced passive |
RT-PCR testing of a predefined number of randomly selected dead ducks or of all dead ducks if less than the predefined number, at predefined intervals |
At least 1 selected dead duck tested positive |
Intervals used: 7 and 14 d; no. selected dead ducks: 3, 5, and 7 |
Active | RT-PCR testing of 60 live ducks randomly sampled at predefined intervals | At least 1 selected live duck tested positive | Intervals used: 20, 30, and 40 d |
*RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR.
Page created: December 02, 2024
Page updated: December 22, 2024
Page reviewed: December 22, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.