Volume 32, Supplement –Summer 2026
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Supplement
Temporal Alignment of Wastewater Signals with Clinical Indicators of Respiratory Illness Postpandemic, Texas, USA
Table 3
Pearson correlation coefficients between RPMF and 2 ED visits data sources for respiratory syncytial virus during the 2022–23 season across 4 counties, daily NSSP ED visit rates and weekly TX-APCD ED claims rates, Texas, USA*
| County | RPMF versus NSSP ED visit |
RPMF versus TX-APCD ED claims |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original r | Optimal lag, d | rmax | Original r | Optimal lag, wk | rmax | ||
| El Paso | 0.56 | 15 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 2 | 0.51 | |
| Fort Bend | 0.61 | 10 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 3 | 0.41 | |
| Harris | 0.57 | 15 | 0.75 | 0.31 | 6 | 0.43 | |
| Lubbock | 0.22 | −7 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 6 | 0.49 | |
*Optimal lag is reported relative to the clinical indicator. A negative value indicates that the wastewater signal leads the clinical indicator; a positive value indicates that it lags. The table shows the correlation at 0 lag (original), the optimal shift required to maximize the association (lag), and the resulting rmax. ED, emergency department; NSSP, National Syndromic Surveillance Program; rmax, maximum correlation; RPMF, reads per million filtered; TX-APCD, Texas All-Payer Claims Database.
Page created: July 17, 2026
Page updated: September 15, 2026
Page reviewed: September 15, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.