Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Number 4—April 2026

Research

Respirable Aerosol Production and Reduction of Avian Influenza Transmission Risk during Chicken Processing, Bangladesh

Nadia Ali RimiComments to Author , Md. Khaled Saifullah, Md. Habibullah Fahad, Kamal Hossain, Rebeca Sultana, Ireen Sultana Shanta, David E. Swayne, Syed Mohammad Golam Mortaza, Md. Giasuddin, Md. Zakir Hassan, Christopher LeBoa, Debashish Biswas, Mahbubur Rahman, Joshua A. Mott, Erin D. Kennedy, and William G. Lindsley1
Author affiliation: University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK (N.A. Rimi); icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh (N.A. Rimi, M.K. Saifullah, M.H. Fahad, K. Hossain, R. Sultana, I.S. Shanta, S.M.G. Mortaza, D. Biswas); University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA (D.E. Swayne); Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Athens (D.E. Swayne); Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Dhaka (M. Giasuddin, M.Z. Hassan); University of California, Berkeley, California, USA (C. LeBoa); The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia (D. Biswas); Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Directorate General of Health Services, Dhaka (M. Rahman); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (J.A. Mott, E.D. Kennedy); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA (W.G. Lindsley)

Main Article

Table

PM2.5 mass concentration across combined sensor positions during experiments of chicken slaughtering and defeathering methods in study of respirable aerosol production and reduction of avian influenza transmission risk during chicken processing, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka, 2020*

Method Mean PM2.5 mass concentration during baseline, µg/m3 (min–max)† Mean PM2.5, µg/m3 (SD) PM2.5 mass concentration difference from referent, µg/m3 Percentage of reduced PM2.5 mass concentration (95% CI) p
value‡
Single chicken slaughtering, n = 27
Open barrel without lid 11.1 (10–18) 49.6 (25.4) Referent
Barrel covered with solid lid 10.1 (10–12) 14.1 (5.5) –35.5 –71.6 (–77.7 to –63.9) <0.001
Barrel covered with star-cut lid 10 (10–10) 13.3 (5.2) –36.2 –73.1 (–78.9 to –65.8) <0.001
Small cone 10.3 (10–16) 57.4 (47.7) 7.8 15.7 (–19.6 to 66.6) 0.458
Large cone
11.4 (10–24)
44.4 (31.6)
–5.2
–10.5 (–35.5 to 24.2)
0.509
Multiple chicken slaughtering, n = 27§
Open barrel without lid 10.4 (10–14) 130.1 (27.5) Referent
Barrel covered with solid lid 10 (10–10) 36 (13.6) –84.5 –64.8 (–69.2 to –59.7) <0.001
Barrel covered with star-cut lid 10.7 (10–20) 34.3 (21.2) –85.5 –65.5 (–71.9 to –57.7) <0.001
Small cone 10.2 (10–12) 112 (52.3) –8.3 –6.3 (–21.6 to 11.9) 0.470
Large cone
12.6 (10–36)
131 (60.1)
13.1
10 (–8.2 to 31.8)
0.327
Single chicken defeathering, n = 9
Open machine without lid 10 (10–10) 20 (6.5) Referent
Machine half covered by hinged lid 10 (10–10) 17.5 (6.7) –2.5 –12.5 (–36.4 to 20.5) 0.438
Machine partially covered by lid with hole 10 (10–10) 13.3 (3.4) –6.7 –33.5 (–49.0 to –13.3) 0.019
Machine fully covered by lid with hole and pivot door 10 (10–10) 10.0 (0.0) –10 –50 (–59.4 to –38.5) 0.002
Machine fully covered by solid lid 10 (10–10) 10.0 (0.1) –10 –49.9 (–59.3 to –38.3) 0.002

*PM2.5, particulate matter <2.5 μm in diameter. †PM2.5 mass concentrations were measured for 5 minutes before each experiment. ‡Calculated using 2-sample t-test. 1.25% was considered as level of significance instead of 5% according to Bonferroni correction.

Main Article

1Current affiliation: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

Page created: March 04, 2026
Page updated: April 10, 2026
Page reviewed: April 10, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external