Volume 4, Number 1—March 1998
Dispatch
Laboratory Survey of Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in New York City, 1993—1995
Table 2
No. of laboratoriesa | 1993 No. (%) | 1994 No. (%) | 1995 No. (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Screened with oxacillin disk | 55 (82) | 63 (97) | 65 (97) |
Screened all isolates | 38 (57) | 56 (86) | 59 (88) |
Screened only sterile | 9 (13) | 6 (9) | 6 (9) |
Other | 8 (12) | 1 (2) | 0 |
Performed penicillin MIC test MIC-tested | 39 (58) | 51 (78) | 56 (84) |
All isolates | 10 (15) | 9 (14) | 7 (10) |
Oxacillin-resistant only | 18 (27) | 39 (60) | 42 (63) |
Sterile isolates only | 5 (7) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
By request only | 4 (6) | 1 (2) | 5 (7) |
Other | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 2 (3) |
Penicillin MIC techniqueb Antibiotic gradient stripc | 11(16) | 41 (63) | 50 (75) |
Automated testsc | 21 (31) | 9 (14) | 2 (3) |
Broth dilution | 8 (12) | 11 (17) | 5 (7) |
Unknown | 2 (3) | 3 (5) | 0 |
Conformed with NCCLS guidelinesd | 15 (22) | 38 (58) | 46 (69) |
aTotal number of laboratories responding to survey in 1993, 1994, 1995 was 67, 65, 67, respectively.
b13 laboratories used more than one MIC technique.
cAntibiotic gradient strip: e.g., E-test. Automated tests: e.g., Microscan, Vitek.
dNCCLS=National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Screened all S. pneumoniae isolates with oxacillin disk diffusion test and confirmed resistance with approved penicillin MIC test.
Page created: December 13, 2010
Page updated: December 13, 2010
Page reviewed: December 13, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.