Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 5—May 2008
Dispatch

Spread of Streptococcus suis Sequence Type 7, China

Changyun Ye*†1, Xuemei Bai†1, Ji Zhang†1, Huaiqi Jing†1, Han Zheng*1, Huamao Du†, Zhigang Cui†, Shouying Zhang†, Dong Jin*, Jianguo Xu*†Comments to Author , Yanwen Xiong*, Ailan Zhao*, Xia Luo*, Qiangzheng Sun*, Marcelo Gottschalk‡, and Yanmei Xu*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; †National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, People’s Republic of China; ‡Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada;

Main Article

Figure 1

Phylogenetic relationship of the tetM sequences of Streptococcus suis. An unrooted maximum-parsimony tree was based on multiple aligned partial tetM sequences of 2 S. suis (asterisk) and 53 reference sequences retrieved from GenBank. The alignment length for the analysis was 1,415 bp. If available, the designation of the tetM-carrying plasmid or transposon is indicated, followed by the GenBank accession number. Percent bootstrap support at each internal node was based on 200 replicate trees. The sequences of known pig origin are marked in red.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship of the tetM sequences of Streptococcus suis. An unrooted maximum-parsimony tree was based on multiple aligned partial tetM sequences of 2 S. suis (asterisk) and 53 reference sequences retrieved from GenBank. The alignment length for the analysis was 1,415 bp. If available, the designation of the tetM-carrying plasmid or transposon is indicated, followed by the GenBank accession number. Percent bootstrap support at each internal node was based on 200 replicate trees. The sequences of known pig origin are marked in red.

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: July 08, 2010
Page updated: July 08, 2010
Page reviewed: July 08, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external