Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 9—September 2016

Nosocomial Outbreak of Parechovirus 3 Infection among Newborns, Austria, 2014

Volker StrengerComments to Author , Sabine Diedrich, Sindy Boettcher, Susanne Richter, Peter Maritschnegg, Dietmar Gangl, Simone Fuchs, Gernot Grangl, Bernhard Resch, and Berndt Urlesberger
Author affiliations: Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (V. Strenger, P. Maritschnegg, S. Fuchs, G. Grangl, B. Resch, B. Urlesberger); Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany (S. Diedrich, S. Boettcher); Institute for Veterinary Disease Control, Mödling, Austria (S. Richter); Regional Hospital Feldbach, Feldbach, Austria (D. Gangl)

Cite This Article


In 2014, sepsis-like illness affected 9 full-term newborns in 1 hospital in Austria. Although results of initial microbiological testing were negative, electron microscopy identified picornavirus. Archived serum samples and feces obtained after discharge were positive by PCR for human parechovirus 3. This infection should be included in differential diagnoses of sepsis-like illness in newborns.

Parechoviruses are small, nonenveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses belonging to the family Picornaviridae. Although most human parechovirus (HPeV) infections cause self-limiting mild respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms, HPeV type 3 (HPeV3) has been found in 5%–13% of newborns and young infants <3 months of age with late-onset sepsis or encephalitis (112). Knowledge of HPeV3 infections originates from single cases or small series of sporadic unrelated infections. One considerable outbreak, affecting ≈200 infants with obviously community-acquired diseases, was recently reported from Australia (1,2). In contrast, we describe a timely confined, and apparently nosocomial, outbreak of HPeV3 infection originating from 1 maternity ward in Austria, affecting one fifth of newborns hospitalized during that period.

The Study


Thumbnail of Chronological details for 9 newborns with human parechovirus 3 infection, Austria, 2014. Either human parechovirus 3 (HPeV3; detected by real-time reverse transcription PCR, n = 5) or particles resembling picornavirus (detected by electron microscopy [EM], n = 2) were detected in &gt;1 of the analyzed materials for 6 (indicated in boldface) of 8 patients. For 1 patient, neither EM nor PCR had been performed. Dark gray bar, postdelivery stay in maternity ward; light gray bar, stay at

Figure. Chronological details for 9 newborns with human parechovirus 3 infection, Austria, 2014. Either human parechovirus 3 (HPeV3; detected by real-time reverse transcription PCR, n = 5) or particles resembling picornavirus (detected...

During August 5–September 7, 2014, a total of 9 newborns, 2–27 (median 5) days of age, showed signs of sepsis-like illness (fever and reduced general condition) and were admitted to the Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. All had been delivered within 2 weeks in the same obstetric unit at the Regional Hospital Feldbach, which is located in a small town (4,500 inhabitants) in southeastern Styria, a region of southern Austria of which Graz is the capital. During these 2 weeks, 44 newborns had been delivered at this obstetric unit (total 1,400/y); 9 (20.5%) born during these 2 weeks became symptomatic (Table; Figure). Diagnostic procedures were performed at the discretion of each attending physician and comprised testing for adenovirus, enterovirus, norovirus, rotavirus, herpesvirus 1, herpesvirus 2, varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus 6, and parvovirus B19. However, no causative agent was identified.

Because the only pediatric department in southern Styria (including Feldbach) is at the Medical University of Graz, all severely ill newborns or infants are admitted there. However, no additional cases of sepsis or sepsis-like illness of unclear etiology were identified in newborns or young infants from that area during these months. The facts that the outbreak was temporally confined and all affected patients had been nursed in the same ward strongly indicated a common source within this unit. Investigations to detect a possible common source in the affected obstetric unit comprised anamnestic and clinical examination of hospital staff members and the newborns’ mothers, surface swabbing (e.g. nursery rooms, baby baths, examination beds, diaper changing tables), microbiological examinations of formula, and analysis of staff roster and occupancy plans. However, a presumed common source or causative agent could not be identified.

To further seek the causative pathogen, we analyzed serum, urine, and nasal secretions from 4 patients (nos. 4, 6, 7, 8; Figure) by negative staining in a transmission electron microscope (Zeiss 906, Oberkochen, Germany) at 80 kv. Although nasal secretions revealed no particles, serum and urine of 2 of the tested patients (nos. 6, 8) contained icosahedral particles, diameter 20–30 nm, resembling picornaviruses. Because of the young ages of the patients, we assumed that the particles were HPeVs. However, by the time we received the electron microscope results indicating picornaviruses, all affected patients had been discharged. We therefore requested fecal samples from all 9 discharged patients for molecular diagnostics of HPeV. We received samples from 4 patients (nos. 5, 6, 7, 9) a median of 29 days (range 9–34) after discharge.

RNA was isolated by using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For HPeV detection, we used a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) selective for the 5′ nontranslated region as described (13,14). Molecular typing of positive samples was conducted by nested real-time RT-PCR and sequencing of the partial capsid viral protein (VP) 3/VP1 region by using primers described by Harvala et al. (15). We performed reverse transcription and first-round amplification by using a One-Step RT-PCR Kit (QIAGEN). Nested amplification was performed by using a HotStarTaq Master Mix Kit (QIAGEN). The resulting fragment (≈300 bp) was subsequently sequenced by using a BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and nested PCR primers. Sequences were aligned to reference sequences in GenBank by using a BLAST ( algorithm (Technical Appendix).

Of the 4 fecal samples tested, 3 were positive for HPeV. Molecular typing that used partial VP3/VP1 capsid protein regions revealed HPeV3 in all 3 samples. To analyze the presence of this pathogen even during acute illness, we retrieved archived serum samples from 5 patients (nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7; Figure). No samples had been retained for 3 other patients. For 4 of the 5 patients tested, archived serum samples were positive for HPeV-3, indicating systemic infection with HPeV3 during the symptomatic phase of disease. Comparison of all 7 sequences (from 3 fecal samples and 4 serum samples) revealed 100% identity. Resulting sequences were submitted to GenBank (accession nos. KU556748–KU556754).

Clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory changes for these 9 patients were compatible with those published for patients with HPeV3 infection (1,2). All 9 newborns recovered without complications; no severe, long-term complications were noted 15 months later.

Despite intensive epidemiologic evaluation, we were not able to identify a human (personnel, mothers, siblings, or visitors) or nonhuman (surfaces, formula) source of infection within this ward. However, because the causative agent was identified several weeks after the end of the outbreak, testing for HPeV had not been performed on any such human or environmental specimens. Therefore, we are not able to clearly differentiate common-source infection from person-to-person transmission. Because newborns do not have direct contact with each other, an asymptomatic adult or older sibling might have been the unidentified common source. This hypothesis is in line with the fact that most infections with HPeV in adults are asymptomatic. Of the 9 newborns, 4 became symptomatic while still hospitalized; thus, they were certainly infected while in the maternity ward. The other 5 became symptomatic after discharge from the obstetric unit, so they might have acquired the infection while outside the hospital. However, the interval between discharge and readmission was <1 week for all but 1 patient, and no cases of community-acquired sepsis and sepsis-like illness in newborns or infants from that region without association with the affected maternity ward could be identified during that period.

Thus, the infection was most likely nosocomial for at least 8 of the 9 patients. Assuming the period of infection for these patients (i.e., during their stay in the maternity ward), we can draw conclusions with regard to the incubation period of HPeV3 infections. The observed intervals between infection and appearance of symptoms were from 1 to 12 days. Only patient 9 became symptomatic 27 days after discharge; this patient might have acquired the infection outside the hospital.


For newborns, HPeV3 is a relevant pathogen; febrile illness appears as sepsis. After symptomatic infection, a newborn can shed HPeV3 in feces for at least 1 month. The contagious nature of the virus can lead to nosocomial outbreaks. Thus, timely identification of the causative agent may prevent nosocomial transmission (by isolation and identification of the source) and unnecessary treatment with antimicrobial drugs. For newborns with sepsis-like illness, routine diagnostic considerations should include HPeV3.

Dr. Stenger is assistant professor for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and head of the Working Group for Infectious Diseases of the Austrian Society for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. His main research interest focuses on the management of infectious diseases in children and adolescents with impaired immunity.



  1. Cumming  G, Khatami  A, McMullan  BJ, Musto  J, Leung  K, Nguyen  O, Parechovirus genotype 3 outbreak among Infants, New South Wales, Australia, 2013–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:114452. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Khatami  A, McMullan  BJ, Webber  M, Stewart  P, Francis  S, Timmers  KJ, Sepsis-like disease in infants due to human parechovirus type 3 during an outbreak in Australia. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:22836.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis  J, Fairley  D, Christie  S, Coyle  P, Tubman  R, Shields  MD. Human parechovirus infection in neonatal intensive care. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34:1214. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Piralla  A, Furione  M, Rovida  F, Marchi  A, Stronati  M, Gerna  G, Human parechovirus infections in patients admitted to hospital in northern Italy, 2008–2010. J Med Virol. 2012;84:68690. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Selvarangan  R, Nzabi  M, Selvaraju  SB, Ketter  P, Carpenter  C, Harrison  CJ. Human parechovirus 3 causing sepsis-like illness in children from midwestern United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30:23842. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Piralla  A, Mariani  B, Stronati  M, Marone  P, Baldanti  F. Human enterovirus and parechovirus infections in newborns with sepsis-like illness and neurological disorders. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(Suppl 1):S757. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Karsch  K, Obermeier  P, Seeber  L, Chen  X, Tief  F, Muhlhans  S, Human parechovirus infections associated with seizures and rash in infants and toddlers. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34:10455. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrerizo  M, Trallero  G, Pena  MJ, Cilla  A, Megias  G, Munoz-Almagro  C, Comparison of epidemiology and clinical characteristics of infections by human parechovirus vs. those by enterovirus during the first month of life. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174:15116. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harvala  H, Wolthers  KC, Simmonds  P. Parechoviruses in children: understanding a new infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23:22430. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolehmainen  P, Jaaskelainen  A, Blomqvist  S, Kallio-Kokko  H, Nuolivirta  K, Helminen  M, Human parechovirus type 3 and 4 associated with severe infections in young children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:110913. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Levorson  RE, Jantausch  BA, Wiedermann  BL, Spiegel  HM, Campos  JM. Human parechovirus-3 infection: emerging pathogen in neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:5457. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer  TK, Midgley  S, Dalgaard  C, Nielsen  AY. Human parechovirus infection, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:837. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Benschop  K, Minnaar  R, Koen  G, van Eijk  H, Dijkman  K, Westerhuis  B, Detection of human enterovirus and human parechovirus (HPeV) genotypes from clinical stool samples: polymerase chain reaction and direct molecular typing, culture characteristics, and serotyping. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;68:16673. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Benschop  KS, de Vries  M, Minnaar  RP, Stanway  G, van der Hoek  L, Wolthers  KC, Comprehensive full-length sequence analyses of human parechoviruses: diversity and recombination. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:14554. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvala  H, Robertson  I, McWilliam Leitch  EC, Benschop  K, Wolthers  KC, Templeton  K, Epidemiology and clinical associations of human parechovirus respiratory infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:344653. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2209.151497

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 9—September 2016

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Volker Strenger, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 30, A-8036 Graz, Austria

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 16, 2016
Page updated: August 16, 2016
Page reviewed: August 16, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.