Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017

Hepatitis E Virus in Wild Boars and Spillover Infection in Red and Roe Deer, Germany, 2013–2015

Helena E. Anheyer-Behmenburg, Kathrin Szabo, Ulrich Schotte, Alfred Binder, Günter Klein, and Reimar JohneComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Hannover, Germany (H.E. Anheyer-Behmenburg, K. Szabo, G. Klein); Central Institute of the Bundeswehr Medical Service, Kiel, Germany (H.E. Anheyer-Behmenburg); German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany (K. Szabo, U. Schotte, A. Binder, R. Johne)

Cite This Article


To determine animal hepatitis E virus (HEV) reservoirs, we analyzed serologic and molecular markers of HEV infection among wild animals in Germany. We detected HEV genotype 3 strains in inner organs and muscle tissues of a high percentage of wild boars and a lower percentage of deer, indicating a risk for foodborne infection of humans.

Hepatitis E is an infection of public health concern, leading to an estimated global disease burden of 3.4 million acute cases, 70,000 deaths, and 3,000 stillbirths per year (1). Large disease outbreaks in nonindustrialized countries are mainly caused by drinking water contaminated with hepatitis E virus (HEV) (2). In industrialized countries, most cases of hepatitis E are sporadic and suspected to be a result of zoonotic HEV transmission from animals to humans (3). The numbers of notified hepatitis E cases have sharply increased in several European countries during recent years (4,5). Chronic HEV infections among recipients of solid organ transplants pose novel public health concerns (6).

HEV belongs to the family Hepeviridae, genus Orthohepevirus. Its RNA genome comprises 3 open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 encodes a multifunctional nonstructural polyprotein with methyltransferase and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes often used for molecular typing. Human pathogenic HEVs are mainly classified into genotypes 1–4 (2,3). The camelid HEV genotype 7 was recently detected in a human (7), however. Although genotypes 1 and 2 infect only humans, genotypes 3 and 4 are zoonotic and infect different animal species and humans (2,3,8). HEV infection in animals is generally not associated with clinical disease.

The main animal reservoirs for genotype 3 are domestic pigs and wild boars, although infections among other mammals have been described (2,3,8). However, whether these animal species represent true HEV reservoirs or are accidental infections due to spillover events is unclear. In this study, we investigated serologic and molecular evidence of HEV infection in wild boars and different deer species during 2 hunting seasons in a hunting area in Germany.

The Study

We obtained serum samples from wild boars, roe deer, red deer, and fallow deer during 2 hunting seasons (season A, 2013–2014; season B, 2014–2015) and analyzed them by using an ELISA (ID Screen Hepatitis E Indirect; ID Vet, Grabels, France) for HEV-specific IgG (Technical Appendix Figure 1). Of 339 serum samples, 81 (23.9%) were positive for HEV IgG; results from 1 sample (0.3%) were questionable. Although all wild deer samples tested negative, the proportion of antibody-positive wild boars increased significantly (p = 0.018) from 13 (27.1%; 95% CI 16.55–37.65) of 48 in season A to 68 (51.5%; 95% CI 44.34–58.66) of 132 samples in season B, with a mean antibody prevalence of 45.0% (Table 1). The capability of the ELISA for detection of HEV-specific antibodies in field serum samples from deer was demonstrated by testing of 153 deer serum samples from another hunting area, which led to 3 positive results (data not shown).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Box plot comparison of HEV RNA load in wild boar and deer specimens from Germany, 2013–2015. Boxes indicate first (bottom) and third quartile; horizontal line within boxes indicate median; error bars indicate minimum and maximum. p values for pairwise comparison of groups are shown. GE, genome equivalents; HEV, hepatitis E virus.

Figure 1. Box plot comparison of HEV RNA load in wild boar and deer specimens from Germany, 2013–2015. Boxes indicate first (bottom) and third quartile; horizontal line within boxes indicate median; error bars...

We also tested liver and serum samples from 415 animals for the HEV genome by using real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) (Technical Appendix). HEV RNA was detected in 46 (11.1%) animals: 39 (16.8%) of 232 wild boars (6/95 [6.3%], from season A and 33/137 [24.1%] from season B); 5 (6.4%) of 78 roe deer; and 2 (2.4%) of 83 red deer (Table 1). Testing of all available organs from the HEV-positive wild boars revealed HEV RNA in >89% of the samples. HEV RNA was detected in all tested muscle samples and in most of the other organ samples of HEV-positive deer (Table 2). Comparison of viral loads in the organs revealed significantly higher genome copy numbers in wild boar liver (median 2.26 × 107 genome equivalents[GE]/g]) compared with those for wild boar musculature (median 4.37 × 103 GE/g) or for deer liver (median 2.22 × 103 GE/g) and deer musculature (median 5.25 × 102 GE/g)(Figure 1; Technical Appendix Figure 2). However, the low number of positive deer samples limits the interpretation of the statistical results.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic relationship of HEV sequences derived from wild boars and deer from Germany, 2013–2015. The tree is based on a 280-bp fragment of the ORF1 (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene) region. The strain designations, animal species (Wb, wild boar), sample type, and sampling year (season A, 2013–2014; season B: 2014–2015) are indicated for the novel strains. The GenBank accession numbers, the corresponding hosts, the geographic origins and genotypes are indicated for selected add

Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship of HEV sequences derived from wild boars and deer from Germany, 2013–2015. The tree is based on a 280-bp fragment of the ORF1 (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene) region. The...

A total of 39 of 46 samples were positive in a nested RT-PCR assay targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene in the ORF1 (Technical Appendix) that were suitable for sequencing. The amplicons showed nucleotide sequence identities to each other ranging from 73.6% to 100.0%. A phylogenetic tree set up for the samples together with HEV subtype reference strains indicated that most sequences cluster in a clade containing subtypes 3c and 3i (Figure 2). Within this clade, HEV sequences from wild boar and deer from both hunting seasons clustered very closely together. Four sequences from wild boars of season B clustered in genotype 3f. HEV isolates from human hepatitis E cases from Germany clustered near the wild boar and deer HEV sequences (nucleotide sequence identities up to 86.1% to a German 3f strain and 88.2% to a German 3c strain).

Using a nested RT-PCR assay targeting the methyltransferase gene in the ORF1 (Technical Appendix), we sequenced a PCR product in 18/46 samples. The nucleotide identities of the sequences ranged from 72.7% to 99.6%. A phylogenetic tree again showed grouping into HEV subtype clade 3ci and subtype 3f (Technical Appendix Figure 3). All sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession nos. KX455427–KX455478).


We detected HEV-RNA and HEV-specific antibodies in a high percentage of wild boars, with a significant difference between the 2 hunting seasons. The detection rates are consistent with previous reports of infection of wild boars in Germany (911). The data underline the high importance of this animal species in the epidemiology of HEV and indicate that wild boars likely represent a persistent reservoir for this virus. The detection of high amounts of HEV RNA in wild boar liver, other organs, and especially in muscle tissue highlights the high risk that HEV can be transmitted to humans through the consumption of meat from these animals that has not been cooked properly.

In contrast, only low percentages of samples from roe deer and red deer tested positive for HEV in our study. Data about HEV infection in wild ruminants in Europe are rare, but some reports have demonstrated HEV infection in several deer species (12,13). Neumann et al. (14) reported serologic and molecular evidence for HEV infection of the indigenous deer species in Germany. We detected HEV RNA in liver, in several organs, and in muscle tissue of the infected deer species. Sequence analysis showed a relationship of HEV from deer with human hepatitis E cases from Germany. In Japan, consumption of deer meat could be linked to acute hepatitis E cases in humans (15). Taken together, deer are likely to represent a source of HEV for humans, and consumption of undercooked deer meat should be considered a risk for acquiring HEV infection.

Analysis of the detected HEV sequences indicated that the same strains of genotype clade 3ci circulated in wild boar and deer species. This finding argues against specific HEV strains exclusively circulating in deer species; however, longer sequence parts or whole virus genomes should be analyzed in future studies to support this finding further. The consistently lower HEV RNA and antibody prevalence in deer than in wild boars indicates a primary circulation in wild boars and only accident transmission to deer. The hypothesis of spillover infections of deer is further supported by the consistent lower viral loads in tissues of infected deer. However, other authors classified deer as a true reservoir for HEV (8). Further studies investigating more geographic areas over longer time, including the parallel analysis of different animal species, are necessary to unravel the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of HEV in wildlife.

Dr. Anheyer-Behmenburg is a veterinary specialist for microbiology at the University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany. She is interested in the epidemiology of emerging zoonotic diseases in wildlife. Her recent scientific work focused on HEV in wild animals.



This research was supported by contracts of the German Armed Forces (E/UR2W/CF507/CF553; E/U2AD/FD011/FF555).



  1. Rein  DB, Stevens  GA, Theaker  J, Wittenborn  JS, Wiersma  ST. The global burden of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 and 2 in 2005. Hepatology. 2012;55:98897. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Johne  R, Dremsek  P, Reetz  J, Heckel  G, Hess  M, Ulrich  RG. Hepeviridae: an expanding family of vertebrate viruses. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;27:21229. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pavio  N, Meng  XJ, Doceul  V. Zoonotic origin of hepatitis E. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;10:3441. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pischke  S, Behrendt  P, Bock  CT, Jilg  W, Manns  MP, Wedemeyer  H. Hepatitis E in Germany—an under-reported infectious disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:57783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoofnagle  JH, Nelson  KE, Purcell  RH, Hepatitis  E. Hepatitis E. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:123744. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee  GY, Poovorawan  K, Intharasongkroh  D, Sa-Nguanmoo  P, Vongpunsawad  S, Chirathaworn  C, et al. Hepatitis E virus infection: Epidemiology and treatment implications. World J Virol. 2015;4:34355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee  GH, Tan  BH, Teo  EC, Lim  SG, Dan  YY, Wee  A, et al. Chronic infection with camelid hepatitis E virus in a liver transplant recipient who regularly consumes camel meat and milk. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:3557.e3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Van der Poel  WH. Food and environmental routes of Hepatitis E virus transmission. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;4:916. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Oliveira-Filho  EF, Bank-Wolf  BR, Thiel  HJ, König  M. Phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis E virus in domestic swine and wild boar in Germany. Vet Microbiol. 2014;174:2338. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schielke  A, Ibrahim  V, Czogiel  I, Faber  M, Schrader  C, Dremsek  P, et al. Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence in hunters from a district in Central Germany, 2013: a cross-sectional study providing evidence for the benefit of protective gloves during disembowelling of wild boars. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:440. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schielke  A, Sachs  K, Lierz  M, Appel  B, Jansen  A, Johne  R. Detection of hepatitis E virus in wild boars of rural and urban regions in Germany and whole genome characterization of an endemic strain. Virol J. 2009;6:58. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Bartolo  I, Ponterio  E, Angeloni  G, Morandi  F, Ostanello  F, Nicoloso  S, et al. Presence of Hepatitis E virus in a red deer (Cervus elaphus) population in Central Italy. [Epub 2015 Apr 19]. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015. DOIGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubankova  M, Kralik  P, Lamka  J, Zakovcik  V, Dolanský  M, Vasickova  P. Prevalence of hepatitis E virus in populations of wild animals in comparison with animals bred in game enclosures. Food Environ Virol. 2015;7:15963. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Neumann  S, Hackl  SS, Piepenschneider  M, Vina-Rodriguez  A, Dremsek  P, Ulrich  RG, et al. Serologic and molecular survey of hepatitis E virus in German deer populations. J Wildl Dis. 2016;52:10613. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tei  S, Kitajima  N, Takahashi  K, Mishiro  S. Zoonotic transmission of hepatitis E virus from deer to human beings. Lancet. 2003;362:3713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2301.161169

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Reimar Johne, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 14, 2016
Page updated: December 14, 2016
Page reviewed: December 14, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.