Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 5—May 2017
CME ACTIVITY - Research

Increased Neurotropic Threat from Burkholderia pseudomallei Strains with a B. mallei–like Variation in the bimA Motility Gene, Australia

Jodie L. MorrisComments to Author , Anne Fane, Derek Sarovich, Erin P. Price, Catherine M. Rush, Brenda L. Govan, Elizabeth Parker, Mark Mayo, Bart J. Currie, and Natkunam Ketheesan
Author affiliations: James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia (J.L. Morris, A. Fane, C.M. Rush, B.L. Govan, E. Parker, N. Ketheesan); Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia (D.S. Sarovich, E.P. Price, M. Mayo, B.J. Currie); Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin (B.J. Currie)

Cite This Article

Introduction

CME Logo

This activity has been planned and implemented through the joint providership of Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at http://www.medscape.org/journal/eid; and (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: April 14, 2017; Expiration date: April 14, 2018

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

•  Distinguish differences in virulence among Burkholderia pseudomallei bimBm sequence variants, based on a mouse model of neurologic melioidosis

•  Distinguish differences in progression among B. pseudomallei bimBm sequence variants

•  Determine the implications for clinical disease of these differences among B. pseudomallei bimBm sequence variants in progression and severity of experimental melioidosis.

CME Editor

Jude Rutledge, BA, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Jude Rutledge, BA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: owns stock, stock options, or bonds from Alnylam; Biogen; Pfizer.

Authors

Disclosures: Jodie L. Morris, BBiomedSc, PhD; Anne Fane, MSc; Derek S. Sarovich, PhD; Erin P. Price, PhD; Catherine M. Rush, PhD; Brenda L. Govan, PhD; Elizabeth Parker, BVSc Masters; Mark Mayo, BSc; Bart J. Currie, FRACP; and Natkunam Ketheesan, MD, PhD, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Top

Abstract

Neurologic melioidosis is a serious, potentially fatal form of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection. Recently, we reported that a subset of clinical isolates of B. pseudomallei from Australia have heightened virulence and potential for dissemination to the central nervous system. In this study, we demonstrate that this subset has a B. mallei–like sequence variation of the actin-based motility gene, bimA. Compared with B. pseudomallei isolates having typical bimA alleles, isolates that contain the B. mallei–like variation demonstrate increased persistence in phagocytic cells and increased virulence with rapid systemic dissemination and replication within multiple tissues, including the brain and spinal cord, in an experimental model. These findings highlight the implications of bimA variation on disease progression of B. pseudomallei infection and have considerable clinical and public health implications with respect to the degree of neurotropic threat posed to human health.

Burkholderia mallei, the etiologic agent of glanders, is thought to have evolved from a single strain of B. pseudomallei, becoming highly specialized for intracellular persistence (1). B. mallei and B. pseudomallei share sequence similarity and are highly pathogenic through the respiratory route, often initiating rapid disease progression resulting in high mortality (2). Unlike B. pseudomallei, B. mallei has a narrower host range and is less capable of extended persistence in the environment.

Knowledge of the virulence factors responsible for inducing the diverse spectrum of clinical manifestations of B. pseudomallei infection remains limited (3). Similar to bacteria of other genera, such as Listeria, Rickettsia, Mycobacterium, and Shigella, intercellular and intracellular movement of Burkholderia are facilitated by actin polymerization at 1 pole of the bacterium (4). The putative autotransporter protein Burkholderia intracellular motility A (BimA) has been shown to mediate actin-based motility in B. pseudomallei and B. mallei, promoting bacterial dissemination while shielding the pathogen from immune surveillance and autophagy (5). Differences in the structure of the bimA gene in B. mallei and B. pseudomallei (68) suggest that actin assembly might occur through distinct mechanisms in these 2 Burkholderia species. B. mallei–like bimA variants (bimBm) have been identified in a subset of B. pseudomallei isolates from Australia and 2 B. pseudomallei isolates from India (9,10). This allele has not yet been identified in isolates from Southeast Asia.

Neurologic melioidosis is a serious, potentially fatal form of B. pseudomallei infection. Recently, we reported that although B. pseudomallei isolates from patients with neurologic melioidosis do not demonstrate selective neurotropism in an experimental model, a distinct subset of B. pseudomallei isolates appeared equipped for rapid dissemination to multiple tissues, including the central nervous system (CNS), after infection (11). Correlation of virulence genes of B. pseudomallei with clinical presentations of melioidosis identified the bimBm allele as a risk factor for neurologic melioidosis (12). Given the importance of BimA in intercellular and intracellular spread of Burkholderia spp. and the recognition of bimBm variants of B. pseudomallei in northern Australia, we hypothesized that bimBm variants of B. pseudomallei would have an increased advantage for establishment of infection and dissemination compared with typical bimBp strains. Therefore, we used a well-characterized animal model of melioidosis to compare virulence and disease progression after infection with clinical isolates of B. pseudomallei collected in the Northern Territory of Australia during October 1989–October 2012 and identified as having either the bimBm or bimBp allele (13).

Methods

B. pseudomallei Isolates

B. pseudomallei strains were isolated from patients with melioidosis. Clinical details and the sequence type determined from multilocus sequence typing of the B. pseudomallei strains investigated are noted (Table). Additional details are described elsewhere (11,12,14,15). These isolates were chosen to represent B. pseudomallei strains previously identified as having bimBm (n = 7) and bimBp (n = 8) alleles within the bimA gene (10,12).

Animal Infection

We used 8- to 12-week-old C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice purchased from the Small Animal Breeding Facility at James Cook University. Experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics committee (A1500). To mimic natural routes of infection, intranasal or subcutaneous routes were used for inoculation by using methods described previously (16). B. pseudomallei isolates were cultured to logarithmic phase and prepared for inoculations as previously described (11).

Virulence Determination

Virulence of bimBm (n = 7) and bimBp (n = 6) isolates were compared in mice as described previously (11). The 50% infectious dose (ID50) was determined by using a modified version of the Reed and Meunch method (17). Virulence, as defined by the ID50 values for B. pseudomallei strains, were compared in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice after intranasal and subcutaneous infection. Data for bimBm and bimBp strains are expressed as mean log10 ID50 +SD

Bacterial Dissemination and Disease Progression

We selected bimBm (MSHR543) and bimBp (MSHR305) strains of comparable virulence (determined by intranasal ID50 values as 2.6 × 102 CFU and 2.9 × 102 CFU, respectively) for comparison of bacterial dissemination after intranasal infection of C57BL/6 mice. C57BL/6 mice provide a more accurate model for neurologic melioidosis because this form of the disease tends to occur in otherwise healthy persons without known risk factors (13). MSHR543 (bimBm) was isolated from a localized skin infection in a healthy 22-year-old with a cut on her hand that was exposed to muddy water. Blood cultures were negative, and she remained systemically well with no evidence of dissemination of B. pseudomallei. The bimBp (MSHR305) strain was isolated from a patient with a fatal case of neurologic melioidosis. The 64-year-old patient had a history of excessive alcohol consumption and had had onset of flaccid paralysis after a period of influenza-like illness (14). An equivalent dose of MSHR543 (1.4 × 104 CFU) or MSHR305 (1.1 × 104 CFU) was used to inoculate mice. Survival rates and signs of disease were monitored daily for a period of 21 days (n = 10 mice per isolate). Mice that became moribund during the experimental period were euthanized, and bacterial loads were determined in organs and pathology of CNS investigated. Parallel groups of mice were inoculated with MSHR543 (bimBm) (n = 15) and MSHR305 (bimBp) (n = 15) for assessment of bacterial loads within blood, liver, spleen, lung, cervical lymph node , brain, and nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) at 2 hours, 1 day, and 3 days postinfection (n = 5 mice per time point) by using methods described previously (11). The detection limit of bacteria in blood and organs was 2 CFU. Data are expressed as the mean log10 CFU +SD.

Bacterial Growth Rate

The growth of B. pseudomallei isolates in trypticase soy broth (TSB) was compared. Overnight broth cultures of B. pseudomallei isolates were diluted 1:10 in fresh TSB and incubated in triplicate at 37°C with shaking at 120 rpm. Absorbance (600 nm) was measured hourly for 10 hours with a microplate reader (Fluostar Omega; BMG Labtech, Mornington, VIC, Australia) and the exponential growth rate for each isolate determined. Data are presented as the mean gradient (μhr–1) +SD for bimBm and bimBp strains.

Internalization and Persistence of Bacteria in Phagocytic Cells

We determined internalization and intracellular persistence of B. pseudomallei isolates (n = 7 bimBm; n = 8 bimBp) in mononuclear phagocytes after co-culture with murine leukocytes. Leukocytes were isolated from spleen and peripheral lymph nodes (cervical, mediastinal, axillary, inguinal, and popliteal) of uninfected female C57BL/6 mice (18). B. pseudomallei isolates were grown to logarithmic phase, washed then added to leukocyte cultures at a multiplicity of infection of 1 (mononuclear cell): 5 (bacteria) (19). After 2 hours of co-culture, kanamycin (250 μg/mL) was added to wells to limit extracellular bacterial growth (18). Internalization (2 h) and persistence (8 and 24 h) of B. pseudomallei isolates in leukocytes was determined by flow cytometry. Uninfected and B. pseudomallei–infected leukocytes were fluorescently stained with a combination of anti-mouse fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated CD45 and F4/80 (BD Biosciences, North Ryde, NSW, Australia) and peridinin chlorophyll-cyanine 5.5 (PerCP-Cy5.5)–conjugated CD11c (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) by using methods described previously (18). After fixation and permeabilization, leukocytes were stained with polyclonal rabbit anti–B. pseudomallei outer membrane protein antibody (BpOMP). A secondary biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) monoclonal antibody and streptavidin–phycoerythrin conjugate (eBioscience) was used for detection of the primary antibody. Acquisition (2 × 105 leukocytes) was performed by using a FACSCalibur with Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA) was used for postacquisition analysis. The fluorescence of extracellular bacteria was quenched with Trypan blue (0.2%). Data are expressed as the percentage or total number of leukocytes (CD45+), macrophages (F4/80+), or dendritic cells (CD11c+) positive for intracellular BpOMP staining. Two independent experiments were conducted, and the mean +SD of data from both experiments is shown. Microbiologic culture was used to confirm intracellular B. pseudomallei numbers estimated by BpOMP staining (20).

Statistical Analysis

We performed statistical analysis by using Graphpad Prism Version 6 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and used Kaplan–Meier survival curves to compare susceptibility to infection with B. pseudomallei isolates. Virulence parameters (ID50 values, time for development of neurologic symptoms, and intracellular bacterial loads within leukocytes) for bimBm and bimBp strains were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Bacterial load kinetics in organs after infection with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) were tested for significance using 2-way analysis of variance with Sidak’s post hoc analysis. We considered comparisons significant at p<0.05.

Results

High Virulence of BimBm Variants in Murine Models of Melioidosis

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Virulence of bimBm and bimBp Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Day 21 50% infectious dose values after intranasal and subcutaneous infection of BALB/c (A) and C57BL/6 (B) mice with bimBm (n = 7) and bimBp (n = 6) B. pseudomallei isolates. Groups of 5 mice were inoculated via intranasal and subcutaneous routes at 10-fold increasing doses of B. pseudomallei, ranging from 100 CFU to 107 CFU. Virulence of bimBm isolates was significantly greater for both mouse strains, regardless of t

Figure 1. Virulence of bimBm and bimBp Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Day 21 50% infectious dose values after intranasal and subcutaneous infection of BALB/c (A) and C57BL/6 (B) mice with bimBm (n = 7)...

We compared virulence, as defined by ID50, for bimBm and bimBp strains in B. pseudomallei–susceptible (BALB/c) and B. pseudomallei–partially resistant (C57BL/6) mice after intranasal and subcutaneous infection (16,21). B. pseudomallei bimBm strains were significantly more virulent for BALB/c and C57BL/6 (Figure 1, panels A and B) mice than bimBp strains, regardless of route of infection. These findings are consistent with the BALB/c–C57BL/6 model of contrasting resistance to B. pseudomallei (21).

When equivalent inoculating doses of B. pseudomallei strains were compared (104 CFU), bimBm strains were more likely to establish persistent infection with bacteria recoverable from multiple organs at 21 days postinfection after intranasal infection of C57BL/6 mice (p = 0.077) (Figure 1, panel C). Additionally, neurologic involvement occurred with more frequency in animals infected through the intranasal route with bimBm compared with those infected with bimBp strains when an equivalent inoculating dose (104 CFU; n = 10 mice/B. pseudomallei strain) was used (p = 0.046) (Figure 1, panel D). Most B. pseudomallei strains tested were capable of CNS infection; however, neurologic involvement tended to occur at comparatively lower inoculating doses for bimBm than bimBp strains. The mean number of bacteria required to infect C57BL/6 mice through the respiratory tract and result in the development of neurologic signs in >20% of mice was 9 × 103 CFU (range 5.3 × 101 to 2 × 104 CFU) for bimBm and 3.7 × 105 CFU (range 2.6 × 104 to 6.6 × 105) for bimBp (p = 0.048). Despite infection of C57BL/6 mice with doses as high as 108 CFU, neurologic symptoms were never observed after infection with 2 strains (MSHR3709 and MSHR1655), both of which are type bimBp.

The mean number of bacteria required to infect susceptible BALB/c mice via the respiratory route and manifest neurologic signs in >20% of mice was 8.6 × 103 CFU (range 4 × 101 to 3 × 104 CFU) for bimBm and 1.5 × 105 CFU (range 2.6 × 104 to 4.2 × 105 CFU) for bimBp (p = 0.03). For C57BL/6 mice, the mean number of days postinfection for onset of neurologic symptoms was 9 (range 5–16) days; for BALB/c mice, it was 11 (range 4–18) days. These findings indicate that bimBm variants are significantly more virulent than bimBp strains in murine models of melioidosis and suggest that fewer inoculating bacteria are required to establish CNS infection.

Differing Disease Progression for bimBm and bimBp Strains after Intranasal Infection

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Brain bacterial loads in mice that had signs of neurologic involvement and succumbed to infection with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Bacterial loads in brains of C57BL/6 mice (MSHR543, n = 4; MSHR305, n = 5) that had become moribund and required euthanasia within the 21-day experimental period after intranasal infection with MSHR543 (1.4 × 104 CFU; white bars) and MSHR305 (1.1 × 104 CFU; black bars). N indicates mice that displayed symptoms

Figure 2. Brain bacterial loads in mice that had signs of neurologic involvement and succumbed to infection with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Bacterial loads in brains of C57BL/6 mice...

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Central nervous system pathology in mice that had signs of neurologic involvement and succumbed to infection with bimBm and bimBp Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Evidence of central nervous system pathology was demonstrated in these mice. Inflammatory infiltrates were prominent in trigeminal nerve branches and ganglion (original magnification ×400) (A) and in the olfactory bulb (original magnification ×200) (B). Cranial meningitis (C) and spinal (D) meningitis were observed, oft

Figure 3. Central nervous system pathology in mice that had signs of neurologic involvement and succumbed to infection with bimBm and bimBp Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. Evidence of central nervous system pathology was demonstrated...

We selected a bimBm (MSHR543) and bimBp (MSHR305) strain of comparable virulence to compare organ tropism after intranasal infection (intranasal ID50 values of 2.6 × 102 and 2.9 × 102 CFU, respectively). Twenty-one day mortality rates were comparable after intranasal infection with either MSHR543 (bimBm) or MSHR305 (40% and 50%, respectively). However, of the animals monitored for survival, 2 of the 5 mice that succumbed to infection with MSHR305 (bimBp) had neurologic symptoms (1 with head tilt on day 7, another with hind limb paresis on day 14). In contrast, all of the 4 mice that succumbed to infection with MSHR543 (bimBm) had symptoms of neurologic melioidosis (3 with head tilt on day 5 and day 7, the other with hind leg paresis on day 7). Moribund mice were euthanized and tissues processed for bacterial load determination. Bacterial loads were high in brains of moribund mice (Figure 2). B. pseudomallei was typically recovered from all tissues investigated, although levels tended to be low or undetectable in the blood of moribund mice that had signs of neurologic infection in the first week postinfection. Compared with moribund animals infected with MSHR543 (bimBm), bacterial loads were significantly higher in NALT of moribund mice infected with MSHR305 (bimBp, p = 0.025), with a similar trend observed in lung. Abscessation was observed in the nasal epithelium, with extensive suppurative inflammation in the olfactory submucosa extending to the olfactory bulb and moderate infiltration in the trigeminal nerve branches (Figure 3, panels A and B) in mice that had signs of neurologic involvement at day 5 postinfection with MSHR543 (bimBm). Leptomeningitis and encephalomyelitis were cardinal features in these animals (Figure 3, panels C and D). We also observed cranial microabscesses were in animals that succumbed to infection, although the area affected varied and included the cerebellum, brainstem, and cerebral cortex (Figure 3, panel E).

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Comparison of early bacterial dissemination and persistence after intranasal infection of C57BL/6 mice with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. A, B) Bacterial load at day 1 (A) and day 3 (B) postinfection in nasal-associated lymphoid tissue, brain, cervical lymph nodes, lung, spleen, liver, and blood after intranasal infection of C57BL/6 mice (n = 5/time point) with MSHR543 (1.4 × 104 CFU; white bars) and MSHR305 (1.1 × 104 CFU; black bars). C) B

Figure 4. Comparison of early bacterial dissemination and persistence after intranasal infection of C57BL/6 mice with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates. A, B) Bacterial load at day 1 (A) and...

Systemic dissemination occurred rapidly for MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp); bacteria were recovered from multiple sites by day 1 postinfection (Figure 4). At 2 hours postinfection, NALT was the only tissue that bacteria were cultured from, with levels comparable for mice infected with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) (log10 CFU of 0.9 +1.1 and 0.3 +1.1, respectively). Compared with MSHR305 (bimBp), replication of MSHR543 (bimBm) was significantly higher in cervical lymph nodes and spleen (Figure 4). Bacterial loads were low in brains of mice infected with MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) within 3 days of infection despite signs of neurologic involvement by day 5 postinfection in 4 mice infected with MSHR543 (bimBm), corresponding to bacterial loads in the brain in excess of 102 CFU (Figure 2). In comparison, only 1 animal infected with MSHR305 (bimBp) had symptoms of neurologic melioidosis and required euthanasia within 7 days.

Five mice (50%) survived to 21 days after intranasal infection with MSHR305 (bimBp), of which 4 had evidence of persistent B. pseudomallei infection, with bacteria recovered from the brain of 1 mouse (Figure 4, panel C). Six mice (60%) survived after intranasal infection with MSHR543 (bimBm), and all had evidence of persistent infection, with bacteria recovered from the brains of 5 mice (Figure 4, panel C).

These findings demonstrate that despite equivalent inoculating doses and similar 21-day mortality rates, the pattern and kinetics of dissemination differ for MSHR543 (bimBm) and MSHR305 (bimBp) after intranasal infection, with neurologic involvement occurring with more frequency after infection with MSHR543 (bimBm).

Increased Persistence of bimBm Strains in Mononuclear Phagocytic Cells

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Internalization and persistence of bimBm and bimBp Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates within murine leukocytes. Spleen and lymph node–derived leukocytes were co-cultured with B. pseudomallei isolates at multiplicity of infection 1:5. A) At 2, 8, and 24 hours postinfection, absolute numbers of CD45+ leukocytes were comparable in cultures infected with bimBm and bimBp strains. B) Bacterial uptake (2 h) and persistence (8 h and 24 h) was compared by assessing the percentage of CD45+ le

Figure 5. Internalization and persistence of bimBm and bimBp Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates within murine leukocytes. Spleen and lymph node–derived leukocytes were co-cultured with B. pseudomallei isolates at multiplicity of infection 1:5. A) At...

To investigate whether differences observe in systemic dissemination in vivo might be attributable to inherent differences in multiplication of bimBm and bimBp strains, we compared the in vitro growth rate of isolates in broth culture. No significant differences were observed for the exponential growth of bimBm and bimBp variants in TSB (slope, μhr-1, 0.105 +0.02 and 0.092 +0.02, respectively). Having demonstrated that bimBm and bimBp strains multiply at the same rate in cell-free media, we next investigated whether intracellular growth rates were comparable for the 2 groups of isolates. Because macrophages and dendritic cells play a pivotal role in protection against B. pseudomallei infection (3), we compared the uptake and persistence of bimBm (n = 7) and bimBp (n = 8) isolates in ex vivo cultures of murine spleen and lymph node–derived macrophages and DC. Absolute numbers of leukocytes were comparable for bimBm- and bimBp-infected cultures at 2, 8, and 24 hours postinfection (Figure 5, panel A). The percentage of leukocytes positive for BpOMP staining was also comparable in cultures infected with bimBm and bimBp strains at 2 and 8 hours postinfection (Figure 5, panel B). However, by 24 hours, the proportion of BpOMP+ leukocytes was significantly higher in cultures infected with bimBm than bimBp strains (p = 0.002), and persistence of bimBm isolates was greater in CD11c+ dendritic cells (p = 0.012) and F4/80+ macrophages (p = 0.006) than bimBp strains (Figure 5, panel C). Overall, these data suggest that bimBm strains of B. pseudomallei might possess mechanisms to facilitate their internalization and intracellular persistence within professional phagocytes.

Discussion

Although uncommon, neurologic melioidosis is a severe and debilitating form of B. pseudomallei infection, primarily affecting healthy persons with no recognizable risk factors and occurring with increased frequency in Australia (13,14,22). Diagnosis and management of neurologic melioidosis is challenging because of nonspecific clinical presentation, poor diagnostics, and intrinsic resistance to antibiotics. Similar to other intracellular bacteria, B. pseudomallei and B. mallei are able to spread to adjacent host cells and evade immune surveillance through the formation of actin tails in a process that involves polymerization of host actin monomers (5,10,23,24). Polymorphisms in machinery used for actin assembly in other obligate intracellular bacteria have been reported to influence virulence and tissue tropism (2527). Recently, isolates possessing a B. mallei–like bimA allele (bimBm) were shown to be associated with neurologic involvement in human melioidosis (12). Our study provides in vivo evidence of the implications of the bimBm sequence variation on disease progression and severity of experimental melioidosis. Compared with B. pseudomallei isolates with typical BimA motifs, bimBm variants were more virulent in an animal model of melioidosis when delivered intranasally or subcutaneously. This subset of strains was associated with increased persistence within phagocytic cells and increased likelihood of establishing CNS infection compared with bimBp strains of B. pseudomallei.

Although no evidence from our study indicates preferential seeding of the CNS compared with other tissues, CNS infection did occur with increased frequency and at lower inoculating doses after infection of mice with bimBm than bimBp strains of B. pseudomallei. Neurologic involvement was observed after intranasal and subcutaneous inoculation with B. pseudomallei isolates, although the frequency of CNS infection increased after intranasal infection. Neurologic involvement, as evidenced by bacterial colonization of the brain and neutrophil infiltration to the cranial and spinal meninges, occurred with more frequency in animals infected with MSHR543 (bimBm) than those exposed to MSHR305 (bimBp). Although we observed considerable variability in the sites of abscessation in the CNS, leptomeningitis, meningoencephalitis, and encephalomyelitis were common features in animals that succumbed to infection. Similar neuropathology has been reported in experimental models using intravenous (rather than intranasal) challenge of mice with B. pseudomallei (28). Furthermore, the neuropathology observed in our study is consistent with the only published histopathologic study of human CNS from patients with melioidosis encephalomyelitis (14).

Clinical and experimental data suggest B. pseudomallei is capable of using >1 mechanism for entry into the brain and spinal cord (2837). B. pseudomallei has been shown to take advantage of olfactory and trigeminal nerve branches to gain direct access to the brain after respiratory infection of mice (2932), and St. John et al. (32) recently demonstrated a role for bimA in direct CNS invasion by B. pseudomallei. Clinical reports also support progression of sinusitis or upper respiratory tract infection with B. pseudomallei to neurologic melioidosis (3335). Additionally, cortical brain abscesses, a clinical presentation commonly reported for neurologic melioidosis in Southeast Asia (33), were observed and are consistent with bacteremic spread of B. pseudomallei, directly or through transmigration of infected leukocytes, to the CNS (28). In addition to direct infection through the upper respiratory tract, cases of neurologic melioidosis from the Darwin Prospective Melioidosis Study have recently provided strong support for direct brainstem or spinal cord infection occurring through nerve root translocation of bacteria secondary to skin inoculation with B. pseudomallei on the face/scalp or limbs (36,37). The observation of hind leg paraparesis in some animals after B. pseudomallei infection in our study provides additional support for this postulated mechanism of CNS entry.

In our study, rapid systemic dissemination to secondary lymphoid tissues was observed for B. pseudomallei bimBm and bimBp variants, with significantly higher bacterial loads observed earlier in these tissues after infection with the bimBm variant. Moreover, despite significant reduction in intracellular bacterial loads, persistence of B. pseudomallei was evident in vitro in dendritic cells and macrophages, tissue phagocytic cells that B. pseudomallei would be exposed to in the early stages of subcutaneous and intranasal infection. We acknowledge that other leukocyte subsets might support intracellular infection with B. pseudomallei and therefore potentially contribute to rapid dissemination of this bacterium in vivo. We limited our assessment to dendritic cells and macrophages because these cells are among the earliest responders to infection and are critical for controlling B. pseudomallei infection (3,20,21). Skin dendritic cells also migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues, facilitating the trafficking and systemic dissemination of live intracellular B. pseudomallei (18). Our data support a potential role for professional phagocytic cells in rapid systemic dissemination of B. pseudomallei to distant sites such as the CNS.

As an increasing number of clinically derived strains are genotyped, it is becoming apparent that the manifestations of melioidosis are likely to be influenced by the infecting strain, as well as the route of infection, infecting dose, and host risk factors for melioidosis. Our findings from this current study provide strong support to our clinical observations (12) that bimBm variation is a predictor for severe forms of melioidosis, including neurologic involvement. Despite comparative interrogation of genomes between B. pseudomallei strains of contrasting virulence (38,39), to date bimA has been identified as the only gene with a strong association with neurologic melioidosis. However, our observation that bimBp strains have the potential to invade the CNS, albeit typically at higher inoculating doses than bimBm strains, suggest that genes other than bimA also contribute to B. pseudomallei invasion and dissemination in vivo. Under favorable circumstances, avirulent B. pseudomallei strains and even the closely related but avirulent bacterium, B. thailandensis, can initiate systemic and lethal infection (40,41). Identifying and characterizing bacterial effector proteins involved in the intracellular and intercellular spread and persistence of B. pseudomallei and B. mallei will be critical for identification of novel agents to manipulate these processes with therapeutic application.

Dr. Morris is a postdoctoral researcher in the Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine at James Cook University. Her research interests include the immunopathogenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Christopher Davis and Ifor Beacham of Griffith University for their helpful discussions and contribution to the work described in this article.

Top

References

  1. Holden  MT, Titball  RW, Peacock  SJ, Cerdeño-Tárraga  AM, Atkins  T, Crossman  LC, et al. Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:142405. DOIPubMed
  2. Torres  AG, Steinmetz  I. Recent progress in melioidosis and glanders. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:149. DOIPubMed
  3. Ketheesan  N. Melioidosis: a century of observation and research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press; 2012.
  4. Stevens  JM, Galyov  EE, Stevens  MP. Actin-dependent movement of bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:91101. DOIPubMed
  5. Stevens  MP, Stevens  JM, Jeng  RL, Taylor  LA, Wood  MW, Hawes  P, et al. Identification of a bacterial factor required for actin-based motility of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56:4053. DOIPubMed
  6. Schell  MA, Ulrich  RL, Ribot  WJ, Brueggemann  EE, Hines  HB, Chen  D, et al. Type VI secretion is a major virulence determinant in Burkholderia mallei. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64:146685. DOIPubMed
  7. Stevens  JM, Ulrich  RL, Taylor  LA, Wood  MW, Deshazer  D, Stevens  MP, et al. Actin-binding proteins from Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia thailandensis can functionally compensate for the actin-based motility defect of a Burkholderia pseudomallei bimA mutant. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:785762. DOIPubMed
  8. Suwannasaen  D, Mahawantung  J, Chaowagul  W, Limmathurotsakul  D, Felgner  PL, Davies  H, et al. Human immune responses to Burkholderia pseudomallei characterized by protein microarray analysis. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:100211. DOIPubMed
  9. Mukhopadhyay  C, Kaestli  M, Vandana  KE, Sushma  K, Mayo  M, Richardson  L, et al. Molecular characterization of clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:1213. DOIPubMed
  10. Sitthidet  C, Stevens  JM, Chantratita  N, Currie  BJ, Peacock  SJ, Korbsrisate  S, et al. Prevalence and sequence diversity of a factor required for actin-based motility in natural populations of Burkholderia species. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:241822. DOIPubMed
  11. Morris  J, Fane  A, Rush  C, Govan  B, Mayo  M, Currie  BJ, et al. Neurotropic threat characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei strains. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:5863. DOIPubMed
  12. Sarovich  DS, Price  EP, Webb  JR, Ward  LM, Voutsinos  MY, Tuanyok  A, et al. Variable virulence factors in Burkholderia pseudomallei (melioidosis) associated with human disease. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91682. DOIPubMed
  13. Currie  BJ, Ward  L, Cheng  AC. The epidemiology and clinical spectrum of melioidosis: 540 cases from the 20 year Darwin prospective study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e900. DOIPubMed
  14. Koszyca  B, Currie  BJ, Blumbergs  PC. The neuropathology of melioidosis: two cases and a review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol. 2004;23:195203.PubMed
  15. Ulett  GC, Currie  BJ, Clair  TW, Mayo  M, Ketheesan  N, Labrooy  J, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence: definition, stability and association with clonality. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:62131. DOIPubMed
  16. Barnes  JL, Ketheesan  N. Route of infection in melioidosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:6389. DOIPubMed
  17. Reed  LJ, Muench  H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938;27:4937.
  18. Williams  NL, Morris  JL, Rush  CM, Ketheesan  N. Migration of dendritic cells facilitates systemic dissemination of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun. 2014;82:423340. DOIPubMed
  19. Barnes  JL, Ketheesan  N. Development of protective immunity in a murine model of melioidosis is influenced by the source of Burkholderia pseudomallei antigens. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85:5517. DOIPubMed
  20. Williams  NL, Morris  JL, Rush  C, Govan  BL, Ketheesan  N. Impact of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on functional responses of dendritic cells and macrophages towards Burkholderia pseudomallei. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011;61:21827. DOIPubMed
  21. Leakey  AK, Ulett  GC, Hirst  RG. BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice infected with virulent Burkholderia pseudomallei provide contrasting animal models for the acute and chronic forms of human melioidosis. Microb Pathog. 1998;24:26975. DOIPubMed
  22. Kandasamy  Y, Norton  R. Paediatric melioidosis in North Queensland, Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44:7068. DOIPubMed
  23. Kespichayawattana  W, Rattanachetkul  S, Wanun  T, Utaisincharoen  P, Sirisinha  S. Burkholderia pseudomallei induces cell fusion and actin-associated membrane protrusion: a possible mechanism for cell-to-cell spreading. Infect Immun. 2000;68:537784. DOIPubMed
  24. Sitthidet  C, Korbsrisate  S, Layton  AN, Field  TR, Stevens  MP, Stevens  JM. Identification of motifs of Burkholderia pseudomallei BimA required for intracellular motility, actin binding, and actin polymerization. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:190110. DOIPubMed
  25. Balandyté  L, Brodard  I, Frey  J, Oevermann  A, Abril  C. Ruminant rhombencephalitis-associated Listeria monocytogenes alleles linked to a multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis complex. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:832535. DOIPubMed
  26. Jacquet  C, Gouin  E, Jeannel  D, Cossart  P, Rocourt  J. Expression of ActA, Ami, InlB, and listeriolysin O in Listeria monocytogenes of human and food origin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:61622. DOIPubMed
  27. Lutter  EI, Bonner  C, Holland  MJ, Suchland  RJ, Stamm  WE, Jewett  TJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis Tarp and correlation with clinical phenotype. Infect Immun. 2010;78:367888. DOIPubMed
  28. Liu  PJ, Chen  YS, Lin  HH, Ni  WF, Hsieh  TH, Chen  HT, et al. Induction of mouse melioidosis with meningitis by CD11b+ phagocytic cells harboring intracellular B. pseudomallei as a Trojan horse. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2363. DOIPubMed
  29. Massey  S, Johnston  K, Mott  TM, Judy  BM, Kvitko  BH, Schweizer  HP, et al. In vivo bioluminescence imaging of Burkholderia mallei respiratory infection and treatment in the mouse model. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:174. DOIPubMed
  30. Owen  SJ, Batzloff  M, Chehrehasa  F, Meedeniya  A, Casart  Y, Logue  CA, et al. Nasal-associated lymphoid tissue and olfactory epithelium as portals of entry for Burkholderia pseudomallei in murine melioidosis. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:176170. DOIPubMed
  31. St John  JA, Ekberg  JA, Dando  SJ, Meedeniya  AC, Horton  RE, Batzloff  M, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei penetrates the brain via destruction of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves: implications for the pathogenesis of neurological melioidosis. MBio. 2014;5:e00025. DOIPubMed
  32. St John  JA, Walkden  H, Nazareth  L, Beagley  KW, Ulett  GC, Batzloff  MR, et al. Burkholderia pseuodomallei rapidly infects the brainstem and spinal cord via the trigeminal nerve after intranasal inoculation. Infect Immun. 2016;84:26818. DOIPubMed
  33. Chadwick  DR, Ang  B, Sitoh  YY, Lee  CC. Cerebral melioidosis in Singapore: a review of five cases. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:726. DOIPubMed
  34. Lim  RS, Flatman  S, Dahm  MC. Sinonasal melioidosis in a returned traveller presenting with nasal cellulitis and sinusitis. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2013;2013:920352.
  35. Lumbiganon  P, Kosalaraksa  P. Uncommon clinical presentations of melioidosis in children: 2 cases with sore throat and 1 case with urticarial rash. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44:8625.PubMed
  36. Currie  BJ. Melioidosis: evolving concepts in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:11125. DOIPubMed
  37. McLeod  C, Morris  PS, Bauert  PA, Kilburn  CJ, Ward  LM, Baird  RW, et al. Clinical presentation and medical management of melioidosis in children: a 24-year prospective study in the Northern Territory of Australia and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:216. DOIPubMed
  38. Challacombe  JF, Stubben  CJ, Klimko  CP, Welkos  SL, Kern  SJ, Bozue  JA, et al. Interrogation of the Burkholderia pseudomallei genome to address differential virulence among isolates. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115951. DOIPubMed
  39. Sahl  JW, Allender  CJ, Colman  RE, Califf  KJ, Schupp  JM, Currie  BJ, et al. Genomic characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates selected for medical countermeasures testing: comparative genomics associated with differential virulence. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121052. DOIPubMed
  40. Ulett  GC, Currie  BJ, Clair  TW, Mayo  M, Ketheesan  N, Labrooy  J, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence: definition, stability and association with clonality. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:62131. DOIPubMed
  41. Deshazer  D. Virulence of clinical and environmental isolates of Burkholderia oklahomensis and Burkholderia thailandensis in hamsters and mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;277:649. DOIPubMed

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to http://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title:
Increased Neurotropic Threat from Burkholderia pseudomallei Strains with a B. mallei–like Variation in the bimA Motility Gene, Australia

CME Questions

1.         Based on the mouse model of neurologic melioidosis studied by Morris and colleagues, which of the following statements about differences in virulence among Burkholderia pseudomallei bimBm sequence variants is most accurate?

A.        Virulence of bimBm variants was similar to that of isolates with typical bimA alleles when delivered intranasally

B.         Virulence of bimBm variants was similar to that of isolates with typical bimA alleles when delivered subcutaneously

C.        Central nervous system (CNS) infection occurred with increased frequency and at lower inoculating doses after infection of mice with bimBm than with bimBp strains of B. pseudomallei

D.        Virulence defined by 50% infectious dose (ID50) values was significantly greater for bimBp strains than for bimBm strains when delivered intranasally to BALB/c mice

2.         Based on the mouse model of neurologic melioidosis studied by Morris and colleagues, which of the following statements about differences in progression among B. pseudomallei bimBm sequence variants is correct?

A.        Compared with isolates with typical bimA alleles, those with the B. mallei–like variation had more rapid systemic dissemination and replication within brain, spinal cord, and other tissues

B.         bimBm vs bimBp strains had greater bacterial colonization of the brain, but without meningeal involvement

C.        Sites of abscessation within the CNS were consistent among infected animals

D.        Phagocytic cells are not involved in rapid systemic dissemination of B. pseudomallei to the CNS and other distant sites

3.         Based on the mouse model studied by Morris and colleagues, which of the following statements about implications for clinical disease of these differences among B. pseudomallei bimBm sequence variants in the progression and severity of experimental melioidosis is correct?

A.        Route of infection, infecting dose, and host risk factors for melioidosis are the only predictors of melioidosis occurrence, manifestations, and severity

B.         bimBm variation is a predictor for severe forms of melioidosis, including neurologic involvement

C.        The study proves that bimA is the only gene that has a strong association with neurologic melioidosis

D.        The study proves that B. pseudomallei uses only 1 mechanism to enter the CNS

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

1

2

3

4

5

2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

1

2

3

4

5

3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

1

2

3

4

5

4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

1

2

3

4

5

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2305.151417

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 5—May 2017

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jodie L. Morris, James Cook University, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, DB094-206, Solander Dr, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: April 14, 2017
Page updated: April 14, 2017
Page reviewed: April 14, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external