Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017
Synopsis

Added Value of Next-Generation Sequencing for Multilocus Sequence Typing Analysis of a Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Outbreak1

On This Page
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Downloads
Article
Technical Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
31
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Related Articles
Computerized Systems for Pneumonia Surveillance
MDR Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
COVID-19 and Non-HIV P. jirovecii Pneumonia
More articles on Pneumonia
Author affiliations: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France (E. Charpentier, C. Garnaud, C. Wintenberger, J.-B. Murat, J. Rendu, P. Pavese, T. Drouet, C. Augier, P. Malvezzi, A. Thiébaut-Bertrand, M.-R. Mallaret, O. Epaulard, M. Cornet, S. Larrat, D. Maubon); Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble (E. Charpentier, C. Garnaud, M.-R. Mallaret, O. Epaulard, M. Cornet, S. Larrat, D. Maubon); Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France (S. Bailly).

Cite This Article

Abstract

Pneumocystis jirovecii is a major threat for immunocompromised patients, and clusters of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) have been increasingly described in transplant units during the past decade. Exploring an outbreak transmission network requires complementary spatiotemporal and strain-typing approaches. We analyzed a PCP outbreak and demonstrated the added value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) study of P. jirovecii strains. Thirty-two PCP patients were included. Among the 12 solid organ transplant patients, 5 shared a major and unique genotype that was also found as a minor strain in a sixth patient. A transmission map analysis strengthened the suspicion of nosocomial acquisition of this strain for the 6 patients. NGS-MLST enables accurate determination of subpopulation, which allowed excluding other patients from the transmission network. NGS-MLST genotyping approach was essential to deciphering this outbreak. This innovative approach brings new insights for future epidemiologic studies on this uncultivable opportunistic fungus.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening opportunistic disease that poses a particular threat in healthcare units that manage patients with oncohematologic conditions, patients having received solid organ transplants (SOTs), and HIV-infected patients. The incidence of PCP among SOT recipients has increased markedly since the early 2000s, concomitant with the development of more intensive immunosuppressive therapy and increasing organ transplant procedures (1). During 2001–2010, the incidence of PCP among HIV-positive/AIDS patients in France dropped from 2.4 to 0.7 cases/105/year (−14.2%/year), whereas incidence increased from 0.13 to 0.35 cases/105/year (+13.3%/year) among patients without HIV infection (2). For SOT patients in France, the incidence of PCP increased by 13% during 2004–2010 (2). Moreover, multiple outbreak clusters in this specific population have been reported (3–5). Patients receiving renal transplants are particularly at risk; most reported PCP clusters have occurred in kidney transplant units (6). These outbreaks support the hypothesis of a de novo person-to-person transmission of P. jirovecii and its potential for nosocomial spread (7).

Exploring an outbreak transmission network requires spatiotemporal and strain-typing approaches. Various genotyping approaches to the study of P. jirovecii epidemiology have been described (8–12). Genotyping based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is standard for strain characterization, especially for organisms that are not easily cultivable, because it provides excellent discriminatory power and reproducibility (3,4,13,14). Multiple P. jirovecii strains isolated from a unique respiratory sample have frequently been reported (6–8,10). The proportions of these mixed strains in samples varied substantially according to the genotyping method (6–8). MLST has been used previously to study PCP outbreaks, but first-generation sequencing technology (i.e., Sanger sequencing) presents limitations for subpopulations characterization. In the use of Sanger sequencing technology, minor variant detection is generally restricted to strains with a relative abundance of DNA (>20% of the total amount) and requires an amplicon cloning step and the sequencing of >5 clones (6,15–17).

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies yield improved performance. Because of clonal amplification before sequence acquisition, these technologies enable in-depth sequencing and the detection of major, minor, and ultra-minor populations within the same sample (18,19).

During 2009–2014, the incidence of PCP in all SOT patients in our institution was <1 case/year. In 2014, six cases of PCP were diagnosed among SOT patients over a 3-month period (May–July) and 6 more through August 2015. These grouped cases involved recipients of various organs, 5 heart recipients, 4 kidney recipients, 1 lung recipient, 1 liver recipient, and 1 recipient of both a heart and a kidney. This atypical distribution and the substantial increase of incidence triggered the exploration of this outbreak. In this study, we evaluated the added value of an NGS-MLST strategy in the specific context of a PCP cluster among SOT patients, taking advantage of the specific characteristics of NGS in terms of subpopulation detection.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection and Samples

The Grenoble Alpes University Hospital has a total of 2,200 beds and performs 150 SOTs each year. In 2014, we followed a total of 1,899 SOT patients in our institution (1,380 kidney, 339 liver, 90 heart, and 90 lung recipients). We included 32 PCP patients in the study (Table 1): 12 SOT recipients (mean age 61.6 years, range 34–75 years) and 20 control patients (mean age 57 years, range 7 months–82 years). Control patients were those with sporadic PCP cases diagnosed in the previous 4 years who had diverse underlying conditions and no obvious epidemiologic link. PCP biologic diagnosis was confirmed by quantitative PCR in respiratory samples (bronchoalveolar lavage fluids, bronchoaspiration, or sputum) as described previously (20).

Clinical Epidemiologic Survey

According to the incubation periods described in the literature (median 53 days, range 1–88 days) (21,22), we collected data concerning patients’ interactions within the institution from 6 months preceding the date of symptom onset in the first patient until the date of diagnosis of PCP in the last patient. Because colonized patients are potential infectious sources of P. jirovecii (23,24), we considered patients to be possibly contagious throughout the whole incubation period, even in the absence of symptoms and for 3 days after initiating treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. We defined transmission as probable when all of the following criteria were present: 1) the 2 patients were present in the same floor and in the same corridor on the same day, 2) the source patient was in the contagious phase, and 3) the duration from the probable date of transmission to the appearance of the first symptoms was compatible with the incubation period for PCP. If 1 of these criteria was missing, transmission was defined as possible. We defined the incubation period for PCP as the time elapsed from the strain transmission to the onset of symptoms.

MLST Strategy

We used an MLST strategy to genotype P. jirovecii strains, as recently recommended (25). We chose a combination of 3 loci belonging to the superoxide dismutase (SOD), the mitochondrial large subunit of ribosomal RNA (mtLSU), and the cytochrome b (CYTB) genes. This scheme displays a high level of strain discrimination and is adapted for accurate P. jirovecii strain typing (14). We designed new primers for each locus to obtain ≈750 bp amplicons depending on the chosen NGS procedure, which was performed by using GS Junior + (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France). Because we used extended sequences to characterize our strains, we could not refer to any previously used sequence type labeling. Thus, we arbitrarily named haplotypes with a capital letter (A), a number (1), and a lowercase letter (a) corresponding to mtLSU, CYTB, and SOD loci. We then labeled final genotypes by the association of the 3 different haplotypes (e.g., A1a). Primers, PCR conditions, and haplotype sequences are summarized in Technical Appendix Tables 1.

Amplicon Library Preparation and Emulsion PCR

We extracted total DNA by using the QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and as previously described (20), and stored extracts at –20°C until library preparation. We prepared the amplicon library by using the universal tailed amplicon sequencing design. We first amplified each region of interest by using specific oligonucleotides coupled to M13 universal primers (PCR1) and then targeted these universal sequences in a second PCR (PCR2) to add a multiplex identifier and the sequencing primers as described in the Guidelines for Amplicon Experimental Design—454 Sequencing System (Roche Diagnostics). We purified PCR products with magnetic beads from an AMPureXP Kit (Beckmann Coulter, Beverly, MA, USA). After qualitative and quantitative analysis, we diluted purified PCR2 products to 1 × 109 molecules/mL and pooled an equal volume of each dilution to generate the amplicon library. We performed emulsion PCR as recommended in the GS Junior + library preparation procedure.

NGS and Limit of Detection

We performed NGS to sequence 700–800 bp fragments, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using a forward and reverse sequencing strategy for better coverage. Ninety-six PCR products were distributed in 2 comparably filled runs. We added a control sample to assess the limit of detection of subpopulations under our experimental conditions. This control consisted of 3 purified mtLSU amplicons belonging to 3 unique haplotypes, based on the results of the first run at 3 different ratios: 98.9%, 1.0%, and 0.1%.

Bioinformatic Analysis

We analyzed NGS results by using Amplicon Variant Analyzer and GS Reference Mapper software (Roche Diagnostics) and compared sequences to their respective reference sequences; GenBank accession nos. were NC_020331.1 (mtLSU), AF146753.1 (SOD), and AF320344.1 (CYTB). Each polymorphism position was verified and visually validated. We applied a 1% threshold for minor variant consideration based on the result of our artificial mix sample. We calculated haplotype frequency by using Amplicon Variant Analyzer software (dividing number of reads corresponding to the haplotype by the total number of reads for 1 locus).

Statistical Analysis and Hunter Index

We compared co-infection proportions between cluster and control populations by using the Fisher exact test, calculated a p value, and defined statistical significance as p<0.05. The Hunter index (D) was calculated to evaluate the discriminatory power of the 3 loci and their association, as previously described (26). Only single strains or strains with an easy extrapolation of the major genotype (variants in only 1 locus or presence of ultra-major variants in all loci) were taken into account for the D calculation. Related samples sharing the outbreak genotype were also excluded, except 1.

Results

NGS Performance

The mean sequencing depths for NGS of P. jirovecii strains were 810× (5×–1,998×, median 739×) and 265× (8×–1,268×, median 233×) for the first and second runs, respectively. Sequence quality was assessed using FastQC software (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk). For the first run, the median Phred score (or Qscore) per base, up to a 750 bp read length, was >24 (corresponding to a probability of error <0.4%); for the second run, the median Phred score was >20 until 400 bp read length (corresponding to a probability of error <1%).

Limit of Detection

In the artificial control sample consisting of 3 mtLSU haplotypes at defined concentrations (C, 98.9%; B, 1%; and F, 0.1%), the C and B haplotypes were correctly detected with NGS at 99% (C) and 1% (B). The ultra-minor F genotype was not detected, a finding consistent with the limited analysis depth obtained for this sequence (220×).

Nucleotide Polymorphisms, Haplotypes, and Genotypes Determination

We genotyped 12 P. jirovecii samples from the SOT patient cluster and 20 samples from unrelated control patients by using the 3 loci NGS-MLST strategy. Analysis of extended 732 bp mtLSU sequences revealed 4 new polymorphisms located both upstream and downstream of the amplicons classically used for genotyping (Technical Appendix Figure). These polymorphisms correspond to 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms at positions 13002, 13505, and 13543 in the mitochondrial genome (GenBank accession no. NC_020331.1) and 1 multinucleotide polymorphism between 13554 and 13560. By contrast, extended CYTB and SOD amplicons did not show new polymorphisms.

Among the 32 samples, we identified 22 different haplotypes for mtLSU, 14 for CYTB, and 4 for SOD, with major and minor variants being considered (Table 2). We identified C2a as the major genotype in 5 SOT patients from the cluster: 1 double (heart and kidney) recipient (T2), 1 heart recipient (T4), and 3 renal transplant recipients (T5, T8, and T10). We also detected this C2a genotype as a minor variant (2%) in 1 other SOT patient belonging to the 2014–2015 outbreak cluster (T7). With major and minor genotypes being considered, 6/12 SOT patients were carrying the C2a genotype. We did not detect this unusual genotype in any control patient, either as a major or minor strain (Table 2).

Epidemiologic Investigation

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Transmission map illustrating space and time events for cluster patients sharing the clonal C2a genotype identified in a study of a Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia outbreak at a university hospital in France, 2009–2015. Rectangles indicate hospitalization periods of &gt;1 day; diamonds indicate 1-day presence in the institution (e.g., emergency services, imaging, laboratory, outpatient clinics). Places involved in the transmission network are shown in color, whereas units not invol

Figure 1. Transmission map illustrating space and time events for cluster patients sharing the clonal C2a genotype identified in a study of a Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia outbreak at a university hospital in France,...

We noted the transmission networks between the 6 SOT patients infected with the C2a strain, the time to diagnosis, and the incubation for PCP (Table 3). The transmission map (Figure 1) pointed out potential nosocomial transmission of the C2a strain involving both heart and kidney transplant units, with the index patient being patient T2, who was a long-standing heart recipient who received a kidney transplant 2 months before PCP diagnosis. Transmission was probable in the following patients: between T2 and T5, within the nephrology department; between T2 and T4, within the heart surgery outpatient clinic; between T5 and T8, in the nephrology department; and between T8 and T10, in the transplant outpatient clinic. Transmission between T5 and T7 was considered only possible because the patients were on the same floor the same day but in perpendicular corridors, and the incubation time for patient T5 was relatively short (4 days). Of note, 4 of the 5 suspected nosocomial transmissions of this strain occurred in outpatient clinic areas (T2/T4, T5/T7, T5/T8, and T8/T10), and 1 occurred in the transplant unit (T2/T5). According to the transmission map, PCP incubation intervals (time elapsed between strain acquisition and symptom onset) were 48 (T10), 49 (T4), 99 (T8), 109 (T5), and 170 (T7) days.

Variants Analysis and Mixed Infections

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Heatmaps representing distribution for mtLSU, CYTB, and SOD variants among patients infected during a Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia outbreak at a university hospital in France, 2009–2015. Patients shown in red correspond to cluster patients sharing the common C2a genotype. Patient shown in blue is the patient having the C2a genotype as minor variant (2%). Percentages shown indicate the level of mixed strain infections for each locus.

Figure 2. Heatmaps representing distribution for mtLSU, CYTB, and SOD variants among patients infected during a Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia outbreak at a university hospital in France, 2014–2015. Patients shown in red correspond to...

Among the 32 respiratory samples, 11 (34.4%) contained a single and unique P. jirovecii strain with no minor variants detected. Thus, 21/32 (65.6%) respiratory samples consisted of multiple P. jirovecii strains, and 17/32 (53.1%) had >2 different P. jirovecii strains. Co-infection proportions were significantly different between the cluster group (5/12 [41.7%] mixed infections) and the control group (17/20 [85.0%] mixed infections; p<0.05). The exact number of strains within each sample was sometimes difficult to determine because minor haplotypes could not always be associated. However, we observed an average minimum of 5 strains per sample (corresponding to the highest number of alleles in 1 locus), ranging from 2 to 12, in these co-infected patients. In more than half of the patients, we detected minor variants with a proportion <10%; 18/32 patients (56.2%) had >1 subpopulation <10%, and 9/32 (28.1%) had only minor variants <10%. The mtLSU, CYTB, and SOD loci enabled detection of 62.5% (20/32), 43.75% (14/32), and 31.25% (10/32) mixed strain infections, respectively. We plotted heatmaps representing strain distribution patterns for each locus (Figure 2). The co-infection proportions were comparable between the 2 sequencing runs (61% and 65%).

Discriminatory Index of the Extended Amplicons

We calculated the Hunter index (D) for each locus of 19 strains (Technical Appendix Table 3), excluding the clonal C2a strains and uninterpretable genotypes (26). The discriminatory index of the mtLSU locus D was 0.754 when considering only known polymorphisms and 0.883 when considering both known and newly described polymorphisms. Similarly, in terms of CYTB and mtLSU loci association, D increased from 0.918 with only known polymorphisms to 0.953 when adding the newly described polymorphisms. When the 3 loci were considered, D further increased from 0.971 to 0.982.

Discussion

An outbreak of 12 diagnosed PCP cases occurred among SOT recipients in our institute during 2014–2015. This cluster consisted of patients carrying different transplanted organs who were followed up in different organ specialty units. We used an exhaustive NGS-MLST approach to accurately characterize the major and minor strains implicated.

To our knowledge, PCP outbreaks among SOT patients have been commonly described in renal transplant patients, reported more rarely in hepatic transplant recipients, and never reported in cardiac transplant patients (although sporadic cases exist in this population). Also, most reported grouped cases of PCP in SOT recipients described cases occurring in patients grafted with the same organ; grouped cases in patients transplanted with different organs rarely have been described (4,5). In our study, even though the SOT cluster patients were followed up by different units, they belonged to the same epidemic event according to genotyping results. Five SOT cluster patients shared a common major genotype, and the transmission map (Figure 1) pointed out potential nosocomial transmission of this strain, which might have been present in both the cardiology and nephrology transplant units. This genotype was not detected in the control group, confirming that this P. jirovecii strain is not commonly present within our institute.

The epidemiologic survey, guided by the genotyping results, identified potential dates and places of transmission between the patients infected with the same P. jirovecii strain. Five probable and 1 possible transmission events between SOT patients were revealed. Of note, 4/5 suspected transmission events occurred in outpatient areas. Waiting rooms and day hospital corridors have been thought to promote person-to-person contact and increase the risk for P. jirovecii transmission (7). The wearing of masks in waiting rooms frequently visited by immunocompromised patients was recently suggested for patients with respiratory symptoms but should also be recommended to any patient, given that asymptomatic carrier state or patients in incubation state might also be at risk for transmission (7,27). Also, patients could have met in certain common areas of the hospital (e.g., cafeteria and corridors), encounters that are usually not in the medical records. Recent studies confirmed the high probability of P. jirovecii airborne transmission or transmission between patients and healthcare workers (23,28). In the affected units, it would have been of interest to screen healthcare workers or air samples to identify asymptomatic carriers of the C2a P. jirovecii strain or its presence in the environment.

In our study, we used a 1% threshold for minor variant detection according to our artificial mix control. By using this threshold, we detected 21/32 (66%) cases with mixed-strain infections and 17/32 (53%) cases with >2 strains. Previous genotyping studies described P. jirovecii multiple infections with diverse proportions of different strains (from 20% to 75%) (29–31). Hauser et al. (29) and Gits-Muselli et al. (12) described mixed populations in 70% of cases with the use of PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism or microsatellite analysis. Our proportion of mixed strains was even higher (85%) when we considered only the control patients, which might more accurately reflect the reality of P. jirovecii strain diversity in a nonoutbreak environment. Ultra-deep sequencing of P. jirovecii strains outside an outbreak context has indicated a 92% proportion of coinfections (32). The proportion we observed with infections involving >2 strains is higher than previously described (30) because of the more accurate variant detection <10% provided by NGS. We noted a difference in the proportion of co-infections between the cluster group (42%) and control group (85%) (p<0.01) despite identical mean sequencing depth. We can hypothesize that the C2a strain has a particular intrinsic virulence or that this cluster has some specific characteristic, but further study would be required.

By using NGS, we found 1 confirmed C2a genotype as the minor strain in patients belonging to the cluster. The ratio among the different P. jirovecii strains can vary over time in a given patient (33). Thus, a previous minor strain can theoretically become a major strain over time. The patient with a minor C2a strain (T7) was thus added to the transmission map. NGS also enabled us to exclude other SOT and control patients from the transmission map with a higher degree of certainty compared with first-generation sequencing (Sanger sequencing), which is not accurate for minor strain detection <20%. Therefore, NGS-MLST appears to have a higher accuracy for describing an outbreak event and for specifying the transmission network.

For experimental purposes, we designed new primers to generate longer amplicons. We discovered 4 new mutations within the 732 bp mtLSU amplicon but no new polymorphism for the SOD or CYTB loci. Currently, no established MLST scheme for PCP typing exists; the 3-loci (mtLSU, CYTB, and SOD) scheme has been proposed and previously used in the a context of a PCP outbreak (3,14). The 5th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia also recommended this MLST scheme for P. jirovecii typing (25). The internal transcribed spacer regions have been used but are difficult to amplify and are at risk for in vitro recombination (14,34). Extended 732 bp mtLSU and CYTB sequence polymorphisms conferred a high discriminatory power (D>0.95), considered to be sufficient for strain discrimination (35). In addition, mtLSU and CYTB amplification is facilitated because of their mitochondrial origin (multicopy genes). Hence, the lengthened 732 bp mtLSU PCR product could be of interest in light of the previously described 300 or 370 bp amplicons (14). The sequencing of 732 bp mtLSU and CYTB could be proposed as a rapid screening method to evaluate strain convergence, whereas SOD or internal transcribed spacer regions could be sequenced in a second step. Further studies will be needed to assess the added value of these newly described polymorphisms.

Although our study revealed new features in P. jirovecii typing, it did not provide evidence for or against features such as diploidy or mitochondrial heteroplasmy of P. jirovecii during PCP (32,36). None of our 32 samples exhibited a clear 50/50 allele repartition, which would have suggested heterozygosity, but the presence of heterozygote stages among the described genotypes cannot be entirely ruled out. The mitochondrial genes mtLSU and to a lesser extent CYTB, displayed higher diversity than the nuclear locus SOD. However, this finding is not sufficient to confirm mitochondrial heteroplasmy because these differences might also have been attributable to the higher rate of polymorphism in the mitochondrial loci. One third of the samples displayed a unique genotype, suggesting that mitochondrial heteroplasmy was not present during these PCP infections.

This study demonstrated the clear added value of NGS-MLST to analyze major and minor strains in epidemiologic P. jirovecii studies. NGS is increasingly attractive because of the rapid development of bioinformatics and the reduced cost of this approach (37). We believe that NGS-MLST represents the next generation of MLST and that this method will become the new standard for strain typing in the next decade, especially for microorganisms that are not cultivable in vitro.

Ms. Charpentier is an assistant professor at Toulouse University Hospital, France, and previously completed her master’s degree on this topic in Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, France. Her primary research interests include medical biology with an emphasis on medical mycology and parasitology.

Top

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to François Collyn, Carole Donne-Gousse, and the Roche sequencing service platform for their technical assistance, Katia Fusillier for sharing her experience and skills on the GS Junior, and Joelle Leral for her assistance with Sanger sequencing. We thank Hervé Pelloux for giving us the opportunity to work on this subject and Julien Fauré for granting us access to the Sanger sequencing platform.

This work was supported by Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Top

References

  1. Roux  A, Canet  E, Valade  S, Gangneux-Robert  F, Hamane  S, Lafabrie  A, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with or without AIDS, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1490–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bitar  D, Lortholary  O, Dromer  F, Coignard  B, Che  D. Bulletin épidémiologique hebdomadaire—BEH n°12–13/2013 [cited 2016 Jul 19]. http://www.invs.sante.fr/Publications-et-outils/BEH-Bulletin-epidemiologique-hebdomadaire/Archives/2013/BEH-n-12-13-2013
  3. Desoubeaux  G, Dominique  M, Morio  F, Thepault  R-A, Franck-Martel  C, Tellier  A-C, et al. Epidemiological outbreaks of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia are not limited to kidney transplant recipients: genotyping confirms common source of transmission in a liver transplantation unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1314–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nankivell  BJ, Firacative  C, Kable  K, Chen  SC-A, Meyer  W. Molecular epidemiology linking multihospital clusters of opportunistic Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1058–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rostved  AA, Sassi  M, Kurtzhals  JAL, Sørensen  SS, Rasmussen  A, Ross  C, et al. Outbreak of pneumocystis pneumonia in renal and liver transplant patients caused by genotypically distinct strains of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Transplantation. 2013;96:834–42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Le Gal  S, Damiani  C, Rouillé  A, Grall  A, Tréguer  L, Virmaux  M, et al. A cluster of Pneumocystis infections among renal transplant recipients: molecular evidence of colonized patients as potential infectious sources of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:e62–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yiannakis  EP, Boswell  TC. Systematic review of outbreaks of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: evidence that P. jirovecii is a transmissible organism and the implications for healthcare infection control. J Hosp Infect. 2016;93:1–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Esteves  F, de Sousa  B, Calderón  EJ, Huang  L, Badura  R, Maltez  F, et al. Multicentre study highlighting clinical relevance of new high-throughput methodologies in molecular epidemiology of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:566.e9–19. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Alanio  A, Olivi  M, Cabaret  O, Foulet  F, Bellanger  A-P, Millon  L, et al. Correlation between Pneumocystis jirovecii mitochondrial genotypes and high and low fungal loads assessed by single nucleotide primer extension assay and quantitative real-time PCR. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2015;62:650–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hauser  PM. The development of a typing method for an uncultivable microorganism: the example of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Infect Genet Evol. 2004;4:199–203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ripamonti  C, Orenstein  A, Kutty  G, Huang  L, Schuhegger  R, Sing  A, et al. Restriction fragment length polymorphism typing demonstrates substantial diversity among Pneumocystis jirovecii isolates. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1616–22. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gits-Muselli  M, Peraldi  M-N, de Castro  N, Delcey  V, Menotti  J, Guigue  N, et al. New short tandem repeat-based molecular typing method for Pneumocystis jirovecii reveals intrahospital transmission between patients from different wards. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125763. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmoldt  S, Schuhegger  R, Wendler  T, Huber  I, Söllner  H, Hogardt  M, et al. Molecular evidence of nosocomial Pneumocystis jirovecii transmission among 16 patients after kidney transplantation. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:966–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maitte  C, Leterrier  M, Le Pape  P, Miegeville  M, Morio  F. Multilocus sequence typing of Pneumocystis jirovecii from clinical samples: how many and which loci should be used? J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2843–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen  X, Zou  X, He  J, Zheng  J, Chiarella  J, Kozal  MJ. HIV drug resistance mutations (DRMs) detected by deep sequencing in virologic failure subjects on therapy from Hunan Province, China. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149215. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang  B, Luo  M, Scott-Herridge  J, Semeniuk  C, Mendoza  M, Capina  R, et al. A comparison of parallel pyrosequencing and sanger clone-based sequencing and its impact on the characterization of the genetic diversity of HIV-1. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26745. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mello  FCA, Lago  BV, Lewis-Ximenez  LL, Fernandes  CA, Gomes  SA. Detection of mixed populations of wild-type and YMDD hepatitis B variants by pyrosequencing in acutely and chronically infected patients. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:96. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang  C, Mitsuya  Y, Gharizadeh  B, Ronaghi  M, Shafer  RW. Characterization of mutation spectra with ultra-deep pyrosequencing: application to HIV-1 drug resistance. Genome Res. 2007;17:1195–201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Quiñones-Mateu  ME, Avila  S, Reyes-Teran  G, Martinez  MA. Deep sequencing: becoming a critical tool in clinical virology. J Clin Virol. 2014;61:9–19. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chumpitazi  BFF, Flori  P, Kern  J-B, Brenier-Pinchart  M-P, Hincky-Vitrat  V, Brion  JP, et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of the quantitative touch-down major surface glycoprotein polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia. Med Mycol. 2011;49:704–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goto  N, Oka  S. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in kidney transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13:551–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yazaki  H, Goto  N, Uchida  K, Kobayashi  T, Gatanaga  H, Oka  S. Outbreak of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in renal transplant recipients: P. jiroveci is contagious to the susceptible host. Transplantation. 2009;88:380–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Le Gal  S, Pougnet  L, Damiani  C, Fréalle  E, Guéguen  P, Virmaux  M, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii in the air surrounding patients with Pneumocystis pulmonary colonization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;82:137–42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Damiani  C, Choukri  F, Le Gal  S, Menotti  J, Sarfati  C, Nevez  G, et al. Possible nosocomial transmission of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:877–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Alanio  A, Hauser  PM, Lagrou  K, Melchers  WJG, Helweg-Larsen  J, Matos  O, et al.; 5th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-5), a joint venture of The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the Immunocompromised Host Society (ICHS) and The European LeukemiaNet (ELN). ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:2386–96. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunter  PR. Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory power of microbial typing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1903–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wynckel  A, Toubas  D, Noël  N, Toupance  O, Rieu  P. Outbreak of pneumocystis pneumonia occurring in late post-transplantation period. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:2417–8, author reply 2418. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Valade  S, Azoulay  E, Damiani  C, Derouin  F, Totet  A, Menotti  J. Pneumocystis jirovecii airborne transmission between critically ill patients and health care workers. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1716–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hauser  PM, Blanc  DS, Sudre  P, Senggen Manoloff  E, Nahimana  A, Bille  J, et al. Genetic diversity of Pneumocystis carinii in HIV-positive and -negative patients as revealed by PCR-SSCP typing. AIDS. 2001;15:461–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rabodonirina  M, Vanhems  P, Couray-Targe  S, Gillibert  R-P, Ganne  C, Nizard  N, et al. Molecular evidence of interhuman transmission of Pneumocystis pneumonia among renal transplant recipients hospitalized with HIV-infected patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1766–73. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Gal  S, Damiani  C, Rouillé  A, Grall  A, Tréguer  L, Virmaux  M, et al. A cluster of Pneumocystis infections among renal transplant recipients: molecular evidence of colonized patients as potential infectious sources of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:e62–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Alanio  A, Gits-Muselli  M, Mercier-Delarue  S, Dromer  F, Bretagne  S. Diversity of Pneumocystis jirovecii during infection revealed by ultra-deep pyrosequencing. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:733. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Gal  S, Blanchet  D, Damiani  C, Guéguen  P, Virmaux  M, Abboud  P, et al. AIDS-related Pneumocystis jirovecii genotypes in French Guiana. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;29:60–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Beser  J, Hagblom  P, Fernandez  V. Frequent in vitro recombination in internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2 during genotyping of Pneumocystis jirovecii. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:881–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Struelens  MJ. Consensus guidelines for appropriate use and evaluation of microbial epidemiologic typing systems. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1996;2:2–11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Urabe  N, Ishii  Y, Hyodo  Y, Aoki  K, Yoshizawa  S, Saga  T, et al. Molecular epidemiologic analysis of a Pneumocystis pneumonia outbreak among renal transplant patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:365–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen  Y, Frazzitta  AE, Litvintseva  AP, Fang  C, Mitchell  TG, Springer  DJ, et al. Next generation multilocus sequence typing (NGMLST) and the analytical software program MLSTEZ enable efficient, cost-effective, high-throughput, multilocus sequencing typing. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;75:64–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2308.161295

1Preliminary results from this study were presented at the American Society for Microbiology Microbe 2016 Conference, June 16–20, 2016, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

2Current affiliation: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Limoges, Limoges, France.

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Danièle Maubon, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Institut de Biologie et Pathologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38048 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 17, 2017
Page updated: July 17, 2017
Page reviewed: July 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external