Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018
Research Letter

Introduction of the Anopheles bancroftii Mosquito, a Malaria Vector, into New Caledonia

Morgane Pol, Sosiasi Kilama, Sandy Duperier, Marie-Estelle Soupé-Gilbert, Elodie Calvez, and Nicolas PocquetComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Institut Pasteur, Noumea, New Caledonia (M. Pol, S. Kilama, M.-E. Soupé-Gilbert, E. Calvez, N. Pocquet); Directorate of Health and Social Affairs, Noumea (S. Duperier)

Cite This Article


In June 2017, an Anopheles mosquito species was detected in New Caledonia. Morphologic identification and genomic sequencing revealed that the specimens tested belong to An. bancroftii genotype A1. This introduction underscores the risk for local malaria transmission and the vulnerability of New Caledonia to vector introduction.

New Caledonia, a French island in the southern Pacific Ocean, had been free of Anopheles mosquito species (1). The absence of all potential vectors of human Plasmodium spp. made New Caledonia free of malaria transmission. However, this situation is fragile because many neighboring countries (e.g., Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu) are endemic for malaria and have highly competent malaria vectors (2) that could be introduced into New Caledonia. Entomologic surveillance conducted since 1979 has never found any Anophelinae mosquitoes in New Caledonia (3). In June 2017, however, a survey indicated the introduction of An. bancroftii mosquitoes into New Caledonia. This discovery prompted us to strengthen entomologic surveillance in the detection area to evaluate the situation.

During June 7–September 8, 2017, we trapped and identified 3,181 mosquitoes, including 27 An. bancroftii mosquitoes. All An. bancroftii mosquitoes were trapped in an area of 6 km2, out of 50 km2 covered by the survey. The first An. bancroftii specimen was trapped by using a Biogents Sentinel Trap (Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany) at a plant nursery. Another specimen was detected 3 km away at the international airport, where traps designed at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), equipped with UV light and CO2, had been set. All other specimens were collected at the plant nursery by using CDC traps (14 females and 3 males) or the human landing catches technique (8 females). The collector (S.K.) noticed that, when he was in the shade, the An. bancroftii female mosquitoes were aggressive even during daytime (e.g., 2:00–4:00 pm). Despite all investigation efforts, no Anopheles mosquito larvae were found.


Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of Anopheles mosquito species introduced in New Caledonia.

Figure. Phylogenetic analysis of Anopheles mosquito species introduced in New Caledonia. Phylogenetic trees were generated by the maximum-likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model using MEGA7 ( Percentage bootstrap values...

We used 2 morphologic identification keys to determine species (4,5). Both keys identified the individual specimens captured as belonging to the species An. bancroftii. The 2 species of the bancroftii group (An. bancroftii and An. pseudobarbirostris) can only be distinguished by pale patches on the wing fringe of the adult females. Because this morphologic criterion is controversial (6), we used 2 collected specimens to improve identification through sequencing. The primers we used distinguish between different genotypes in the An. bancroftii group by means of an internal transcribed spacer 2 gene sequence analysis (7), which indicated that both specimens collected in the nursery plant (GenBank accession nos. MF716525 and MF716526) match at 100% with An. bancroftii genotype A1 (GenBank accession no. AF203381; Figure). A 2001 study showed that An. bancroftii genotype A1 mosquitoes were found only in the Northern Territory of Australia, whereas other genotypes were found in Queensland, Australia, or in Papua New Guinea (Technical Appendix Figure) (7). This genetic analysis provides a small clue regarding the origin of the introduction of this species but does not indicate its route. This genotype might have been introduced in other countries during 2001–2017 before reaching New Caledonia.

In Papua New Guinea, An. bancroftii mosquitoes are considered a secondary vector of malaria because of their weak anthropophilic feeding behavior and their small numbers in the regions studied. Furthermore, when investigated, the proportion of sporozoite-positive specimens was low (<1% in ELISA targeting circumsporozoite protein) (8,9). In the Northern Territory of Australia, where only genotype A1 is present (7), An. bancroftii mosquitoes are described as a major pest species because females readily and aggressively bite humans (6,7). This observation concurs with our preliminary observations made in New Caledonia, which might result in higher numbers of human–vector contacts than reported in Papua New Guinea. Considering that an average of 4 imported malaria cases were reported annually during 2000–2015 in New Caledonia (10), the introduction of a potential malaria vector in a new environment raises the specter of long-term local malaria transmission risk. In case of establishment, the risk for local transmission will be assessed by investigating the vector competence of the introduced genotype.

Although the bioecology of An. bancroftii mosquitoes remains poorly known in New Caledonia, the larval habitats have been previously described as floodplains and freshwater swamps (6). These ecosystems are abundant in the proximity of the plant nursery were adult mosquito specimens where initially detected. Although no larvae have been found, 27 adults were trapped during a period of 4 months, suggesting efficient colonization. Establishment of the species is a main concern, and sustainable entomologic surveillance might assist in the design and evaluation of an eradication plan.

In summary, we describe the introduction of An. bancroftii genotype A1 mosquitoes into New Caledonia, a territory previously known as free from Anopheles mosquito species. Although this species is not the most competent malaria vector, this sentinel event points to New Caledonia’s vulnerability to the introduction of more competent vectors. Furthermore, because of its localization, its economic status, and the sea and air connections it shares with other Pacific islands, New Caledonia functions as a hub in the region. If An. bancroftii mosquitoes settle in New Caledonia, they could further spread to other Anopheles-free territories in the South Pacific.

Ms. Pol is an engineer in the Unit of Research and Expertise in Medical Entomology at Institut Pasteur, New Caledonia. Her main field of research is surveillance and identification of vector mosquitoes in New Caledonia.



This work was performed thanks to collaboration with the Directorate of Health and Social Affairs of New Caledonia. We thank Olivia O’Connor for her advice and technical support and Vincent Richard, Cyrille Goarant, and Arnaud Tarantola for editorial comments.



  1. Rageau  J. The geographical distribution of mosquitoes in New Caledonia and dependencies with keys for their identification [in French]. Noumea, New Caledonia: Commission du Pacifique Sud; 1958. p. 1–19.
  2. Sinka  ME, Bangs  MJ, Manguin  S, Rubio-Palis  Y, Chareonviriyaphap  T, Coetzee  M, et al. A global map of dominant malaria vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:69. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Institut Pasteur New Caledonia. Annual report 2016 [in French]. Noumea, New Caledonia: Institut Pasteur de Nouvelle-Calédonie; 2017. p. 23–33.
  4. Lee  D, Hicks  M, Griffiths  M, Debenham  M, Bryan  J, Russell  R, et al. In: Debenham ML, editor. The Culicidae of the Australasian Region. Volume 5. Canberra (Australia): Australian Government Publishing Service; 1987.
  5. Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit. Identification keys to medically important arthropod species [cited 2017 Jul 11].
  6. Beebe  NW, Russell  TL, Burkot  TR, Lobo  NF, Cooper  RD. The systematics and bionomics of malaria vectors in the southwest Pacific. In: Manguin S, editor. Anopheles mosquitoes–new insights into malaria vectors. Rijeka (Croatia): InTech; 2013. p. 357–94.
  7. Beebe  NW, Maung  J, van den Hurk  AF, Ellis  JT, Cooper  RD. Ribosomal DNA spacer genotypes of the Anopheles bancroftii group (Diptera: Culicidae) from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Insect Mol Biol. 2001;10:40713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hii  JL, Smith  T, Mai  A, Ibam  E, Alpers  MP. Comparison between anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) caught using different methods in a malaria endemic area of Papua New Guinea. Bull Entomol Res. 2000;90:2119. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper  RD, Waterson  DG, Frances  SP, Beebe  NW, Pluess  B, Sweeney  AW. Malaria vectors of Papua New Guinea. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39:1495501. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Directorate of Health and Social Affairs. Health situation in New Caledonia 2015 [in French]. Noumea (New Caledonia): Direction des Affaires Sanitaires et Sociales de Nouvelle-Calédonie; 2015. p. 45–46.




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2403.171689

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Nicolas Pocquet, Unité de Recherche et d’Expertise en Entomologie Médicale, Institut Pasteur de Nouvelle-Calédonie, 11 Ave Paul Doumer B.P. 61, 98845 Noumea CEDEX, New Caledonia

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: February 16, 2018
Page updated: February 16, 2018
Page reviewed: February 16, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.