Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019

Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Dynamics in International Travelers

Charles LangelierComments to Author , Michael Graves1, Katrina Kalantar1, Saharai Caldera, Robert Durrant, Mark Fisher, Richard Backman, Windy Tanner, Joseph L. DeRisi, and Daniel T. Leung
Author affiliations: University of California, San Francisco, California, USA (C. Langelier, K. Kalantar, S. Caldera, J.L. DeRisi); Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco (C. Langelier, S. Caldera, J.L. DeRisi); University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (M. Graves, R. Durrant, M. Fisher, R. Backman, W. Tanner, D.T. Leung); ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City (R. Durrant, M. Fisher)

Cite This Article


We used metagenomic next-generation sequencing to longitudinally assess the gut microbiota and antimicrobial resistomes of international travelers to clarify global exchange of resistant organisms. Travel resulted in an increase in antimicrobial resistance genes and a greater proportion of Escherichia species within gut microbial communities without impacting diversity.

International travel is a known contributor to the emergence of organisms with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (14). Colonization with resistant microbes acquired during travel can persist asymptomatically for extended periods and result in transmission into the environment and susceptible populations (5). The mechanisms underlying acquisition of AMR bacteria during travel are incompletely understood, although changes in the intestinal microbiota are hypothesized to play a role (6). To clarify AMR exchange during global travel, we used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to assess gut microbiota composition and the antimicrobial resistome.

The Study

During March 2016–2018, we recruited adults with planned travel to Asia or Africa for healthcare-related work. Participants introduced 1 tablespoon of stool into vials with either RNAprotect (QIAGEN, or Cary-Blair (CB) media and then submitted samples and surveys pretravel, posttravel, 30 days posttravel, and 6 months posttravel. Upon receipt, we stored RNAprotect samples at −80°C and CB samples at 4°C until inoculation onto chromogenic agar plates selective for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing bacteria (CHROMagar ESBL) and incubation overnight at 37°C. We then inoculated single colonies into LB broth and incubated overnight at 37°C. If multiple morphotypes were identified, we conducted separate subcultures. We performed speciation by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

DNA and RNA extracted using the QIAGEN Powerfecal kit underwent metagenomic sequencing as previously described (7). Raw data are available publicly (Bioproject PRJNA509512). We detected enteric microbiota using a recently developed bioinformatics pipeline (7). We aggregated microbial alignments at the genus level before downstream analyses. To control for background environmental and reagent contaminants, we incorporated no-template water control samples alongside extracted nucleic acid and carried them forward throughout library preparation and sequencing. We then performed direct subtraction of total reads aligning to each microbial genus present in controls from each study sample before downstream analyses.

We used the SRST2 computational tool and ARGannot_r2 database ( to identify AMR genes with allele coverage of >20% (8). Although a precise definition of ESBL has not been established, we used a working definition of Ambler class A–D β-lactamases with known or predicted ability to confer resistance to first- through third-generation cephalosporins (9,10). We required detection of chromosomally encoded Ambler class C β-lactamases (i.e., AmpC) by both DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq to capture actively expressed genes.

Nine of 10 participants were culture-positive for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-PE) upon return, including 8 persons who traveled to Nepal and 1 who went to Nigeria. One traveler was found to be colonized before departure (traveler 3 [T3]); 3 travelers had persistent carriage at the 30-day visit (T2, T3, and T5) and 2 at 6 months (T3 and T5) (Table 1). Although 4 participants experienced diarrheal symptoms during travel, only 1 (T5) had persistent diarrheal symptoms at 6 months. Diarrheal symptoms were not associated with persistent ESBL-PE colonization at any point, and no travelers reported antibiotic use or receipt of healthcare in an inpatient setting while traveling. All travelers were exposed to inpatient healthcare facilities, and 3 travelers reported street food consumption.


Thumbnail of Microbiome and AMR gene dynamics in international travelers. A) Longitudinal profile of traveler gut microbiome diversity measured by Shannon diversity Index. Traveler 5 (T5) had a Shannon diversity index >3 SDs below the mean when measured at 30 days and 6 months posttravel. B) Microbes, by genus, demonstrating the greatest fold change in abundance after travel on the basis of DNA sequencing nucleotide alignments. C) Total number of AMR genes identified with >20% allele cover

Figure. Microbiome and AMR gene dynamics in international travelers. A) Longitudinal profile of traveler gut microbiome diversity measured by Shannon diversity Index. Traveler 5 (T5) had a Shannon diversity index >3 SDs...

We first examined changes in gut microbiome α diversity after international travel (Figure, panel A) and found that the Shannon diversity index (SDI) did not significantly change upon return (p = 0.674 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test) or at day 30 posttravel (p = 0.250 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test). We then assessed whether microbial community composition differed across all participants at their posttravel versus pretravel visit but found no difference (Bray Curtis Index p = 0.23 by permutational multivariate analysis of variance). Although global composition and diversity of gut microbiota did not significantly change after travel, we observed significant differences in the abundance of discrete genera. Across all participants, Enterobacteriaceae demonstrated the greatest fold change in abundance posttravel; Escherichia was the genus most differentially increased (p<0.001 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test) (Figure, panel B; Appendix Figures 1, 2).

Analysis of the antimicrobial resistome revealed an increase in AMR genes and transcripts after return from travel (p<0.01 for DNA and p = 0.03 for RNA sequencing, both by Wilcoxon rank-sum test) (Table 2; Figure, panels C–D; Appendix Figure 3). ESBL-encoding genes, AmpC-encoding genes, or both were identified in 100% of samples with an ESBL culture-determined phenotype and in 14% of samples without, including 1 participant (T8) who was phenotypically ESBL-negative after travel (Table 1). β-lactam–resistance genes increased posttravel, including AmpC, CTX-M, OXA, and SHV gene families known or predicted to confer ESBL production, as well as diverse additional β- lactamase genes (Appendix Figure 3). Travel also resulted in an increase in qnr plasmid–mediated quinolone-resistance genes, as well as trimethoprim (dfr)-, sulfa-, macrolide-, and aminoglycoside-resistance genes (Table 2). Genes conferring resistance to tetracyclines and aminoglycosides were most abundant in travelers at baseline and remained stable or decreased during travel (Table 2).

We found no significant differences in SDI between persistent carriers and those who lost carriage at 30 days (n = 3; p = 0.56 by t-test) or at 6 months (n = 2; p = 0.27 by t-test) posttravel. T5, who was colonized at both time points and who was the only traveler with persistent diarrheal symptoms, had an SDI >3 SDs below the mean at 6 months (Figure, panel A). Bray-Curtis distance measured pretravel or posttravel did not differ between travelers who were ESBL-PE positive by culture at 30 days or 6 months posttravel (p = 0.32 by permutational multivariate analysis of variance). No individual taxa were associated with posttravel ESBL positivity on the basis of an adjusted p value <0.05 (t-test) at 30 days or 6 months posttravel.


International travel is a well-recognized contributor to the global spread of emerging infectious diseases, including AMR bacteria (1,4). We analyzed the enteric microbiota and resistomes of returned travelers and found a marked increase in AMR genes that was associated with an increased proportion of Escherichia bacteria. At baseline, few participants had evidence of ESBL colonization; however, after travel, ESBL and actively transcribed AmpC genes were notably increased, consistent with previous reports (4,11). Both mNGS and culture-based methods found evidence of persistent ESBL colonization after 6 months, suggesting that travel can induce long-term changes in the antimicrobial resistome (5). In addition to β-lactamase genes, mNGS identified a diversity of other AMR gene classes that increased in abundance after travel. For example, 80% of participants acquired horizontally transferable qnr genes after travel, reflecting the limited utility of quinolones for treatment of traveler’s diarrhea (12). Although we did not detect genes known to encode carbapenemases, participants might have harbored carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteraciae, given that a combination of an ESBL or AmpC gene with a porin mutation or efflux pump can lead to carbapenem resistance (13).

Changes in microbiome diversity were not associated with ESBL positivity at 30 days or 6 months posttravel, suggesting that disruption of the antimicrobial resistome can occur in the setting of a preserved microbial community structure. We observed a high rate of ESBL-PE acquisition in this cohort, most of whom traveled to the Indian subcontinent, consistent with previous studies of travelers returning from this region (1). Notably, none of the travelers in this cohort reported antibiotic use, suggesting that substantial ESBL-PE colonization can occur even in the absence of antibiotic-related disruption of commensal gut microbiota.

Because this study is limited by small sample size, relevant associations might have been missed. In addition, we could not assess the presence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by using culture-based methods. mNGS and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance need assessment in larger cohorts traveling to more destinations. Nonetheless, our findings highlight the pervasiveness of AMR microbe exchange during international travel and the promise of mNGS for assessing the global exchange of antimicrobial resistance.

Dr. Langelier is an assistant professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the University of California, San Francisco. His research interests involve using metagenomics and transcriptional profiling to investigate host–pathogen interactions and understand the causes of diagnostically challenging diseases.



We thank Theresa Sofarelli for inspiration and support for this study.



  1. Arcilla  MS, van Hattem  JM, Haverkate  MR, Bootsma  MCJ, van Genderen  PJJ, Goorhuis  A, et al. Import and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by international travellers (COMBAT study): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:7885. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuenzli  E, Jaeger  VK, Frei  R, Neumayr  A, DeCrom  S, Haller  S, et al. High colonization rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli in Swiss travellers to South Asia- a prospective observational multicentre cohort study looking at epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:528. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hassing  RJ, Alsma  J, Arcilla  MS, van Genderen  PJ, Stricker  BH, Verbon  A. International travel and acquisition of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. von Wintersdorff  CJH, Penders  J, Stobberingh  EE, Oude Lashof  AML, Hoebe  CJPA, Savelkoul  PHM, et al. High rates of antimicrobial drug resistance gene acquisition after international travel, The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:64957. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Duijkeren  E, Wielders  CCH, Dierikx  CM, van Hoek  AHAM, Hengeveld  P, Veenman  C, et al. Long-term carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the general population in the Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:136876. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. David  LA, Materna  AC, Friedman  J, Campos-Baptista  MI, Blackburn  MC, Perrotta  A, et al. Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R89. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Langelier  C, Kalantar  KL, Moazed  F, Wilson  MR, Crawford  ED, Deiss  T, et al. Integrating host response and unbiased microbe detection for lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in critically ill adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E1235362. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Inouye  M, Dashnow  H, Raven  L-A, Schultz  MB, Pope  BJ, Tomita  T, et al. SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med. 2014;6:90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush  K, Jacoby  GA. Updated functional classification of β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:96976. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Giske  CG, Sundsfjord  AS, Kahlmeter  G, Woodford  N, Nordmann  P, Paterson  DL, et al. Redefining extended-spectrum β-lactamases: balancing science and clinical need. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Decker  BK, Lau  AF, Dekker  JP, Spalding  CD, Sinaii  N, Conlan  S, et al. Healthcare personnel intestinal colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:82.e14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Riddle  MS, Connor  BA, Beeching  NJ, DuPont  HL, Hamer  DH, Kozarsky  P, et al. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers’ diarrhea: a graded expert panel report. J Travel Med. 2017;24(Suppl_1):S57–74.
  13. Logan  LK, Weinstein  RA. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(Suppl_1):S28–36.




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2507.181492

Original Publication Date: May 15, 2019

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Charles Langelier, University of California San Francisco, Infectious Diseases, 513 Parnassus Ave, Room S-380, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 17, 2019
Page updated: June 17, 2019
Page reviewed: June 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.