Volume 31, Number 9—September 2025
Research
Drivers of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever in Natural Host and Effects of Control Measures, Bulgaria
Table 1
Results from multivariable mixed-effect models used to assess serologic associations in study of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in sheep and effects of control measures, Bulgaria*
Characteristic | CCHFV glycoprotein Gc IgG positive |
CCHFV nucleoprotein IgG positive |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
aOR (95% CI) | p value | aOR (95% CI) | p value | ||
Study type | |||||
Follow-up, March 2018, n = 58 | Referent | Referent | |||
Cross-sectional, Oct 2017, n = 140 |
1.31 (0.64–2.75) |
0.464 |
14.49 (5.54–46.93) |
<0.001 |
|
Age category | |||||
13–24 mo., young adult sheep, n = 115 | Referent | Referent | |||
3–12 mo., lambs, n = 83 | 1.44 (0.74–2.82) | 0.283 | 1.8 (0.94–3.68) | 0.073 |
*Associations between CCHFV glycoprotein Gc or nucleoprotein seropositivity and time of sampling (study type) and age; only farms visited during both field studies 1 and 2 (n = 14) and sheep of the same age (3–24 mo) (total no. = 198) were considered. Models had farm as a random effect. Results from univariate analysis are in the Appendix Tables 1, 2. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CCHFV, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus.
Page created: July 03, 2025
Page updated: August 26, 2025
Page reviewed: August 26, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.