Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 3—March 2017
Research

Zika Virus RNA Replication and Persistence in Brain and Placental Tissue

On This Page
Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Downloads
Article
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
171
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Related Articles
Zika Virus Transmission in Northeast Brazil
Evidence of Zika Virus Reinfection
About the Cover
More articles on Zika
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (J. Bhatnagar, D.B. Rabeneck, R.B. Martines, S. Reagan-Steiner, Y. Ermias, L.B.C. Estetter, T. Suzuki, J. Ritter, M.K. Keating, G. Hale, J. Gary, A. Muehlenbachs, T. Oduyebo, D. Meaney-Delman, W. Shieh, S.R. Zaki); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (A. Lambert, R. Lanciotti); Patología Hospital Universitario de Neiva, Neiva, Colombia (F. Bolaños); Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogota, Colombia (E.A. Parra Saad)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Zika virus is causally linked with congenital microcephaly and may be associated with pregnancy loss. However, the mechanisms of Zika virus intrauterine transmission and replication and its tropism and persistence in tissues are poorly understood. We tested tissues from 52 case-patients: 8 infants with microcephaly who died and 44 women suspected of being infected with Zika virus during pregnancy. By reverse transcription PCR, tissues from 32 (62%) case-patients (brains from 8 infants with microcephaly and placental/fetal tissues from 24 women) were positive for Zika virus. In situ hybridization localized replicative Zika virus RNA in brains of 7 infants and in placentas of 9 women who had pregnancy losses during the first or second trimester. These findings demonstrate that Zika virus replicates and persists in fetal brains and placentas, providing direct evidence of its association with microcephaly. Tissue-based reverse transcription PCR extends the time frame of Zika virus detection in congenital and pregnancy-associated infections.

Zika virus has recently caused global concern because of an unprecedented outbreak of infection in Brazil and its association with congenital microcephaly and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancy loss (1–4). Vertical transmission of Zika virus from infected mothers to fetuses has been reported (5–7). However, the mechanism of intrauterine transmission of Zika virus, cellular targets of viral replication, and the pathogenesis that leads to microcephaly and other congenital malformations have not yet been completely elucidated.

Recent in vitro studies that used brain organoids, neurospheres, and human pluripotent stem cell–derived brain cells have demonstrated Zika virus infection of human neural stem and progenitor cells and have also shown that placental macrophages are permissive to Zika virus infection (8–13). Several studies that used mouse models have revealed that Zika virus infection of mice during early pregnancy results in infection of placenta and fetal brain, causing intrauterine growth restrictions, spontaneous abortions, and fetal demise (14–16). Animal models and in vitro studies, although providing valuable insights, might not exactly reflect Zika virus disease processes in humans (9,17). We previously detected Zika virus antigens in placentas of women and in human fetal or neonatal brains (18,19). However, the presence of antigens does not necessarily indicate virus replication. Previous case studies have detected Zika virus RNA by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in fetal or neonatal brains, in amniotic fluid, and in placentas of women who had acquired Zika virus infection during early pregnancy (5,20–22). Nevertheless, localization of replicating Zika virus RNA directly in the tissues of patients with congenital and pregnancy-associated infections is critical for identifying cellular targets of Zika virus infection and virus persistence in various tissues and for further investigating the mechanism of Zika virus intrauterine transmission.

Furthermore, laboratory diagnosis of congenital and pregnancy-associated Zika virus infections, particularly those involving adverse pregnancy outcomes, is also challenging because of the typically short duration of viremia (23,24). Generally, Zika virus RT-PCR can detect viral RNA in serum within 3–10 days of symptom onset (24,25). Thus, diagnosis by serum RT-PCR can be difficult for neonates who acquire Zika virus infection in utero and for women who acquire (undiagnosed) Zika virus infection during early pregnancy and later experience adverse pregnancy or birth outcomes, because Zika virus RNA generally clears from maternal/infant serum by the time the infant is born or infection is suspected. Serologic testing by ELISA, along with plaque-reduction neutralization testing, can be useful for these cases but may not always provide conclusive Zika virus diagnosis for patients with previous flavivirus exposure or immunization (23–25) and cannot characterize the virus strain and genotype. As a part of the ongoing Zika virus public health response, we developed Zika virus RT-PCR and in situ hybridization (ISH) assays for the detection and localization of Zika virus RNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and tested various tissues from infants with microcephaly who died. We also tested placental/fetal tissues from a series of women suspected of being infected with Zika virus during various stages of pregnancy.

Methods

Clinical Specimens

As part of an ongoing public health response effort, we tested FFPE tissue specimens from 52 case-patients (8 infants with microcephaly who died and 44 women) for whom Zika virus infection was clinically and epidemiologically suspected. The tissue specimens were submitted during December 2015–July 2016 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch (Atlanta, GA, USA), by local and state health departments and pathologists for diagnostic consultation. In this series, the definition of a case-patient was 1) a pregnant woman with possible Zika virus disease (based on >1 of the following symptoms: fever, rash, arthralgia, or conjunctivitis and a history of residing in or traveling to countries with active Zika virus mosquito-borne transmission) or 2) an infant with clinical and epidemiologic evidence of possible Zika virus–associated congenital microcephaly. Case-patients were from the United States (n = 38, including 6 from US territories), Brazil (n = 7), and Colombia (n = 7). Tested specimens were placenta, umbilical cord, fetal tissues (from pregnancy loss) from 44 women suspected of being infected with Zika virus during pregnancy, and different portions of the brain (including cerebral cortex, pons, medulla), kidney, liver, spleen, lung, and heart from 8 infants with microcephaly who died. We also included in this analysis all available clinical, demographic, and travel history information and other relevant laboratory results from the state and local health departments and the CDC National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, Arboviral Diseases Branch (including available serology and serum RT-PCR results). Clinical status of the infant, including determination of microcephaly or apparently healthy status, was based on the information (generally including anthropometric measurements, physical examination, hearing test and imaging findings) provided to CDC by the state and local health departments and referring clinicians or pathologists as of date of testing. All samples and associated medical and autopsy records were provided in the context of diagnostic consultation, a routine public health service provided by CDC. As such, institutional review was not required for the testing described in this article. Clinical and pathologic findings for 5 cases from Brazil have been previously described (18,19).

RNA Extraction, RT-PCR, and Sequencing

We designed 2 sets of primers that target the nonstructural 5 (NS5) and envelope (E) genes of Zika virus and developed RT-PCR assays for the detection of Zika virus RNA from FFPE tissues. We validated the RT-PCR assays by using various positive and negative controls. Positive controls were RNA extracted from FFPE blocks of cultured cells infected with Zika virus prototype (MR766, 1947) and Brazil 2015 strains. Negative controls were RNA extracted from FFPE cell culture controls or tissue specimens from persons with previously confirmed infection with the following viruses: dengue types 1–4, West Nile, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis, eastern and western equine encephalitis, chikungunya, herpes, parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, enterovirus, rubella, Powassan, and Lacrosse. We extracted RNA from FFPE tissues of all 52 case-patients (multiple FFPE tissue blocks per patient) by using an optimized extraction protocol as previously described (26) and tested the samples by newly developed Zika virus NS5 and E-gene RT-PCR and by RT-PCR for dengue and chikungunya viruses (27,28). RT-PCR assays were performed by using a QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Valencia, CA, USA) and 5 μl of RNA template, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermocycling conditions used for Zika virus NS5 gene RT-PCR were as follows: 1 cycle at 50°C for 30 min; 1 cycle at 95°C for 15 min; then 40 cycles of incubation at 94°C, 56°C, and 72°C for 1 min each; followed by 1 cycle of final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The primer sequences, annealing temperatures, and amplification product sizes of the RT-PCRs are summarized in Table 1. The NS5 (127-bp) and E (209-bp) gene–positive amplicons were directly sequenced on a GenomeLab GeXP Genetic Analysis System (AB SCIEX, LLC, Redwood City, CA, USA). The search for homologies to known sequences was performed by using the BLAST nucleotide database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). To evaluate the level of fragmentation and presence of PCR inhibitors, we also tested each sample by housekeeping gene 18S rRNA RT-PCR by using QuantumRNA Classic 18S Internal Standard (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

To calculate the Zika virus RNA copy number in tissues of case-patients positive by conventional RT-PCR, we also performed a quantitative real-time RT-PCR by using primers as described previously (23). The amount of human β-actin mRNA in the RNA extracted from each section was also determined and used as an internal reference for normalization. The relative copy number of Zika virus RNA was calculated by using the β-actin mRNA copy number, estimated at 1,500 copies/cell, as previously described (29).

ISH

Zika virus ISH was performed by using sense and antisense riboprobes that target multiple genes of Zika virus (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA, USA). ISH was developed and validated on Zika virus–positive culture cells and on various Zika virus–negative controls, including tissues from case-patients or cultures positive for dengue virus, West Nile virus, and chikungunya virus. Riboprobes targeting dengue virus and dapB gene (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) were also used as negative control probes for ISH. To localize Zika virus genomic RNA (using antisense probe) and negative-sense replicative RNA intermediates (using sense probe) in tissues, we performed ISH on FFPE brain and placental tissues positive for Zika virus by RT-PCR, as previously described (30). To examine pathologic changes in the tissue, we also analyzed tissue sections from all case-patients by routine histopathology techniques. To define specific cell types, we performed immunohistochemical analysis by using antibodies against neuronal nuclei (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and CD163 (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) on serial sections of block positive for Zika virus by ISH from selected case-patients, according to previously described protocol (19).

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad Prism statistical software, version 6.0a (Graph Pad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). We compared demographic and clinical variables between the 2 groups by using the Fisher exact test (2-sided). We used the Mann–Whitney U test for 2-group comparisons of continuous data. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Results

Case-Patients Characteristics

We identified Zika virus RNA by RT-PCR in various tissue specimens from 32 (62%) case-patients (Table 2). Median maternal age (age of pregnant women and mothers of infants) was 27 years (range 15–39 years) for case-patients with positive Zika virus RT-PCR results and 29 years (18–43 years) for case-patients with negative Zika virus RT-PCR results; all case-patients had Zika virus infection–like symptoms. For the 32 case-patients with positive Zika virus RT-PCR results, the commonly reported signs were rash (94%), fever (59%), arthralgia (28%), headache (19%), and conjunctivitis (13%). For the 20 case-patients with negative Zika virus RT-PCR results, the most commonly reported signs were rash (80%), fever (45%), arthralgia (40%), headache (20%), and conjunctivitis (20%). No distinctive maternal clinical features between case-patients positive and negative for Zika virus by tissue RT-PCR were identified. Maternal symptom onset occurred during the first trimester for 27 (52%) case-patients and during the second or third trimester of pregnancy for 24 (46%) (Table 2). Information about timing of symptom onset was not available for 1 case-patient. Of 52 case-patients, 30 (58%) had an adverse pregnancy or birth outcome and 22 (42%) had live-born, apparently healthy, infants (Table 2).

RT-PCR and Sequencing

Brain and placental tissues from 32 (62%) of the 52 case-patients were positive by both Zika virus RT-PCR assays (gene targets NS5 and E). Sequence analysis of all positive amplicons showed 99%–100% nt identities with Zika virus Asian genotype strains currently (2015–2016) circulating in Brazil. RT-PCR results were positive for 24 (75%) of 32 case-patients with adverse pregnancy (n = 12) or birth (n = 12) outcomes and positive for 8 (36%) of 22 case-patients with live-born, apparently healthy, infants (p = 0.0082). Of 24 case-patients with positive RT-PCR results and adverse pregnancy/birth outcomes, 23 had maternal symptom onset during the first trimester, whereas all 8 case-patients with apparently healthy infants and positive RT-PCR results had symptom onset in the third trimester (p<0.0001).

Of the 13 microcephaly-associated case-patients (Table 3), 8 were infants with microcephaly and fatal outcome (died within few minutes to 2 months after birth) and 5 were women who had live-born infants with microcephaly and nonfatal outcome. Of these, 12 (92%) were positive for Zika virus by tissue RT-PCR. Zika virus RNA was detected by RT-PCR in brain tissues of all 8 infants; all had maternal symptom onset during the first trimester. Other tested tissues from infants (kidney, liver, spleen, heart, and rib) were negative by RT-PCR. Of the 17 case-patients with adverse pregnancy outcomes (Table 4), Zika virus RNA was detected by RT-PCR in placentas/umbilical cord/fetal tissues of 12 (70%); all had symptom onset during the first trimester. Of 22 case-patients who had live-born, apparently healthy, infants, including 8 case-patients with positive RT-PCR results, 21 (95%) had symptom onset during the second or third trimester.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Zika virus RNA load levels in human brain and placental tissues. The scatter plot graph shows the relative levels of Zika virus RNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, which were quantified by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR by using primer-probe sets for Zika virus envelope gene and β-actin mRNA. β-actin mRNA was used as an internal reference gene that provided a normalization factor for the amount of RNA extracted from a section. The copy number

Figure 1. Zika virus RNA load levels in human brain and placental tissues. The scatter plot graph shows the relative levels of Zika virus RNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, which were quantified...

The time frame from maternal symptom onset to detection of Zika virus RNA by RT-PCR in brains was 119–238 (mean 163) days and in placentas was 15–210 (mean 81) days. Relative levels of Zika virus RNA in the infant brain tissues (Figure 1) were ≈1,200-fold higher than those in the second or third trimester or full-term placentas (brain geometric mean 651.9 [95% CI 63.91–6,650] copies/cell; second or third trimester or full-term placentas geometric mean 0.5129 [95% CI 0.1649–1.595] copies/cell). In addition, relative levels of Zika virus RNA in the first trimester placentas (13.10 [1.718–99.87] copies/cell) were 25-fold higher than those in the second or third trimester or full-term placentas.

ISH

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Localization of Zika virus RNA by in situ hybridization in brain tissues from infants with microcephaly. A) ISH with use of antisense probe. Zika virus genomic RNA (red stain) in cerebral cortex of an infant (case-patient no. 66, gestational age 26 wk). Original magnification ×10. B) ISH with use of sense probe. Serial section showing negative-strand replicative RNA intermediates (red stain) in the same areas shown in panel A. Original magnification ×10. C) ISH with use of antisense

Figure 2. Localization of Zika virus RNA by in situ hybridization in brain tissues from infants with microcephaly. A) ISH with use of antisense probe. Zika virus genomic RNA (red stain) in cerebral...

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Localization of Zika virus RNA by ISH in placental tissues of women after spontaneous abortion. A) ISH with use of antisense probe. Zika virus genomic RNA localization in placental chorionic villi, predominantly within Hofbauer cells (red stain, arrows), of a case-patient who had spontaneous abortion at 11 wk gestation (case-patient no. 56). Original magnification ×10). B) ISH with use of sense probe. Serial section showing negative–strand replicative RNA intermediates (red stain, a

Figure 3. Localization of Zika virus RNA by ISH in placental tissues of women after spontaneous abortion. A) ISH with use of antisense probe. Zika virus genomic RNA localization in placental chorionic villi,...

Overall, Zika virus RNA was demonstrated by ISH in tissues of 16 (50%) of 32 case-patients with positive Zika virus RT-PCR results. Intense signals from antisense (which binds to Zika virus genomic RNA) and sense (which binds to replicative RNA intermediates) probes were observed in brain tissues (Figure 2) of 7 of 8 infants with microcephaly. Zika virus replicative RNA, detected by using sense probe, was observed in the neural cells, neurons, and degenerating glial cells within the cerebral cortex of the brain (Figure 2). Immunostaining with antineuronal nuclei and antiglial fibrillary acidic protein was also noted in the areas of ISH staining (Figure 2). Zika virus genomic and replicative RNA was also localized in placental chorionic villi (Figure 3) of 9 (75%) of 12 women with positive Zika virus RT-PCR results who had an adverse pregnancy outcome during the first or second trimester. All 9 of these women had symptom onset during the first trimester of pregnancy. Zika virus replicative RNA was predominately observed in the Hofbauer cells of the placental chorionic villi, as identified by immunohistochemistry studies with CD163 cell marker (Figure 3). For 6 of 8 women positive for Zika virus by RT-PCR and who had apparently healthy infants, placental tissues were available for ISH testing and were all negative. Zika virus–positive culture cells and tissues from case-patients positive for Zika virus showed no signal when tested by using dengue virus and DapB probes.

Discussion

This work demonstrates evidence of Zika virus RNA replication in placentas of women who had pregnancy losses during the first or second trimester of pregnancy and in brain tissues of infants with microcephaly. We directly localized Zika virus negative-sense replicative intermediates in Hofbauer cells of placenta and neural cells and neurons by using ISH. Our findings indicate that Hofbauer cells may play a role in the dissemination or transfer of Zika virus to the fetal brain, particularly during early pregnancy. Furthermore, tissue-based RT-PCR assays described herein also extend the time frame for Zika virus detection; thus, the assays can be a valuable adjunct for the diagnosis of congenital and pregnancy-associated infections and can help to expand diagnostic opportunities for Zika virus, particularly when the mother was not previously tested, the window of detection for serum RT-PCR and serology has passed, or results of Zika virus testing are inconclusive (e.g., serology consistent with recent flavivirus infection). In addition, our findings also reveal the persistence of Zika virus RNA in placenta and brain tissues, which might provide insights into the potential late or long-term sequelae of the infection.

In this series of case-patients, Zika virus clearly exhibited neurotropism. In 7 of 8 infants with microcephaly, the presence of Zika virus genomic and replicative RNA was observed in neural cells, neurons, and degenerating glial cells of cerebral cortex by ISH; whereas, all other tested tissues from these case-patients were negative by RT-PCR and ISH. Thus, our findings support those of previous in vitro and mouse studies, which demonstrated that Zika virus infects human neural stem and progenitor cells and causes severe pathologic changes in the brain but not in other visceral organs (8–11,16). A recent study also reported higher expression of Zika virus entry receptor AXL in radial glia (the neural stem cells of the human fetal cerebral cortex), astrocytes, and neural progenitors (31). Furthermore, we noted that the relative levels of Zika virus RNA in the brain tissues of infants were >1,000-fold higher than those in placentas, according to real-time quantitative RT-PCR, which also suggests replication of Zika virus in brain. Previous case reports describe identification of Zika virus antigens and RNA predominately in fetal brain tissues by IHC and RT-PCR (6,18–21). We also noticed that in all microcephaly cases that were positive by tissue RT-PCR, maternal symptom onset occurred during the first trimester, which might suggest that the virus can cause abnormal brain development when infection occurs early in organogenesis. Previous studies of rubella reported that the risk for fetal infection with congenital anomalies is highest when exposure/infection occurred before 11–12 weeks of gestation and sharply decreased with increasing gestational age (32).

Findings also demonstrate detection of Zika virus RNA by RT-PCR in 12 (86%) of 14 women who had spontaneous abortions or fetal losses. All of these women had symptom onset during the first trimester. For 9 of these 12 case-patients (all with pregnancy losses at <19 weeks gestational age), replicative Zika virus RNA was demonstrated in Hofbauer cells (placental macrophages) of chorionic villi, suggesting direct infection and replication of Zika virus in Hofbauer cells. We have previously reported the presence of trophoblast necrosis and fibrin deposit along with viral antigens in placenta, which may also indicate placental damage by direct infection (33). A recent in vitro study also demonstrated that Zika virus infects and primarily replicates in Hofbauer cells (13). Prior studies have identified macrophages as target cells for dissemination of dengue virus as well (34). Taken together, these findings suggest that Hofbauer cells, which have access to fetal blood vessels, may facilitate transfer or dissemination of the virus to the fetal brain. Of note, in this case series, Zika virus RNA was not detected in any of the 3 women who had intrauterine fetal demise. Conversely, we detected Zika virus RNA by RT-PCR in placentas of 4 women who had live-born infants with nonfatal microcephaly; however, viral load in the placentas was low. This finding may indicate temporal persistence of Zika virus RNA in placental tissues. Persistence of other viruses in immune-privileged organs (e.g., eyes, placenta, fetal brain) has been reported (35,36). Previous studies related to other arboviruses, including West Nile and chikungunya viruses, have also reported persistence of arbovirus RNA in various tissues by RT-PCR (37–39).

Zika virus RNA (low copy number) was also detected in placental tissues of 8 women who had apparently healthy infants. In each of these women, symptom onset began during the third trimester; for 5 of them, serologic evidence of Zika virus or unspecified flavivirus infection was found. However, in 3 apparently healthy infants, serum/cord blood RT-PCR or serology results were negative for Zika virus or flavivirus; for remaining 5 infants, Zika virus testing was not performed. Detection of Zika virus RNA in the placenta by RT-PCR cannot distinguish between maternal and fetal infection. The absence of apparent abnormalities in these infants could be because 1) Zika virus may not have transferred from the mother to the fetus in utero because the late-pregnancy placenta might have protected the fetus, or an effective fetal immune response might be present; or 2) the critical period of organogenesis was complete before maternal or possibly fetal infection; therefore, no apparent/major malformations were identified at the time of birth. Clinical implications for an infant with Zika virus RNA detected in the placenta, in the absence of laboratory evidence of Zika virus in the infant, are unknown. However, the negative Zika virus testing results (cord blood or serum RT-PCR and serology) in these infants should be interpreted with caution; the results could be negative because the window of Zika virus detection might have passed. Periodic monitoring of these infants may be helpful for early recognition of potential late sequelae of congenital infections. Two recent studies observed neurologic abnormalities in infants whose mothers acquired Zika virus infection in the third trimester of pregnancy; for 1 of these infants, neurologic abnormalities were first identified at 6 months of age (7,40).

In conclusion, our findings further support the linkage of Zika virus with microcephaly, suggest its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes, and demonstrate evidence of Zika virus replication and persistence in fetal brain and placenta. This article highlights the value of tissue analysis to expand opportunities to diagnose Zika virus congenital and pregnancy-associated infections and to enhance the understanding of mechanism of Zika virus intrauterine transmission and pathogenesis. In addition, the tissue-based RT-PCRs extend the time frame for Zika virus detection and particularly help to establish a diagnosis retrospectively, enabling pregnant women and their healthcare providers to identify the cause of severe microcephaly or fetal loss.

Dr. Bhatnagar is team lead of Molecular Pathology in the Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia. Her primary research interests include developing molecular diagnostic assays and techniques for identifying microbial pathogens from tissues and studying molecular pathogenesis of complex infectious diseases of public health significance.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Mitesh Patel and Pamela Spivey for helping coordinate information about the case-patients, Luciana Silva-Flannery for performing immunohistochemistry for cell markers, and Dominique Rollin for providing Zika virus culture controls. We acknowledge Mary Tanner, Charnetta Williams, and Lillianne Lewis for their contributions as part of the Zika Virus Response Epidemiology Task Force. We gratefully acknowledge all the public health departments, laboratories, and the pathologists who submitted specimens to CDC.

Top

References

  1. Hennessey  M, Fischer  M, Staples  JE. Zika virus spreads to new areas—region of the Americas, May 2015–January 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:55–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rasmussen  SA, Jamieson  DJ, Honein  MA, Petersen  LR. Zika virus and birth defects—reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1981–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cauchemez  S, Besnard  M, Bompard  P, Dub  T, Guillemette-Artur  P, Eyrolle-Guignot  D, et al. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013-15: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2016;387:2125–32. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Simeone  RM, Shapiro-Mendoza  CK, Meaney-Delman  D, Petersen  EE, Galang  RR, Oduyebo  T, et al.; Zika and Pregnancy Working Group. Possible Zika virus infection among pregnant women–United States and Territories, May 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:514–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvet  G, Aguiar  RS, Melo  AS, Sampaio  SA, de Filippis  I, Fabri  A, et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:653–60. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sarno  M, Sacramento  GA, Khouri  R, do Rosário  MS, Costa  F, Archanjo  G, et al. Zika virus infection and stillbirths: a case of hydrops fetalis, hydranencephaly and fetal demise. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004517. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasil  P, Pereira  JP Jr, Raja Gabaglia  C, Damasceno  L, Wakimoto  M, Ribeiro Nogueira  RM, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro—preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 4 [Epub ahead of print].;NEJMoa1602412. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tang  H, Hammack  C, Ogden  SC, Wen  Z, Qian  X, Li  Y, et al. Zika virus infects human cortical neural progenitors and attenuates their growth. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:587–90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cugola  FR, Fernandes  IR, Russo  FB, Freitas  BC, Dias  JL, Guimarães  KP, et al. The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature. 2016;534:267–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li  C, Xu  D, Ye  Q, Hong  S, Jiang  Y, Liu  X, et al. Zika virus disrupts neural progenitor development and leads to microcephaly in mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19:120–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcez  PP, Loiola  EC, Madeiro da Costa  R, Higa  LM, Trindade  P, Delvecchio  R, et al. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science. 2016;352:816–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Quicke  KM, Bowen  JR, Johnson  EL, McDonald  CE, Ma  H, O’Neal  JT, et al. Zika virus infects human placental macrophages. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:83–90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bayer  A, Lennemann  NJ, Ouyang  Y, Bramley  JC, Morosky  S, Marques  ET Jr, et al. Type III interferons produced by human placental trophoblasts confer protection against Zika virus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:705–12. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Miner  JJ, Cao  B, Govero  J, Smith  AM, Fernandez  E, Cabrera  OH, et al. Zika virus infection during pregnancy in mice causes placental damage and fetal demise. Cell. 2016;165:1081–91. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Adibi  JJ, Zhao  Y, Cartus  AR, Gupta  P, Davidson  LA. Placental mechanics in the Zika-microcephaly relationship. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:9–11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Aliota  MT, Caine  EA, Walker  EC, Larkin  KE, Camacho  E, Osorio  JE, et al. Characterization of lethal Zika virus infection in AG129 mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10. DOIGoogle Scholar
  17. Pulvers  JN, Bryk  J, Fish  JL, Wilsch-Bräuninger  M, Arai  Y, Schreier  D, et al. Mutations in mouse Aspm (abnormal spindle-like microcephaly associated) cause not only microcephaly but also major defects in the germline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:16595–600. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Martines  RB, Bhatnagar  J, Keating  MK, Silva-Flannery  L, Muehlenbachs  A, Gary  J, et al. Notes from the Field: evidence of Zika virus infection in brain and placental tissues from two congenitally infected newborns and two fetal losses—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:159–60. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Martines  RB, Bhatnagar  J, de Oliveira Ramos  AM, Davi  HP, Iglezias  SD, Kanamura  CT, et al. Pathology of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: a case series. Lancet. 2016;388:898–904. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mlakar  J, Korva  M, Tul  N, Popović  M, Poljšak-Prijatelj  M, Mraz  J, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:951–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Driggers  RW, Ho  CY, Korhonen  EM, Kuivanen  S, Jääskeläinen  AJ, Smura  T, et al. Zika virus infection with prolonged maternal viremia and fetal brain abnormalities. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2142–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kourtis  AP, Read  JS, Jamieson  DJ. Pregnancy and infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2211–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lanciotti  RS, Kosoy  OL, Laven  JJ, Velez  JO, Lambert  AJ, Johnson  AJ, et al. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1232–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karwowski  MP, Nelson  JM, Staples  JE, Fischer  M, Fleming-Dutra  KE, Villanueva  J, et al. Zika virus disease: a CDC update for pediatric health care providers. Pediatrics. 2016;137:pii:e20160621. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rabe  IB, Staples  JE, Villanueva  J, Hummel  KB, Johnson  JA, Rose  L, et al.; MTS. Interim guidance for interpretation of Zika virus antibody test results. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:543–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bhatnagar  J, Blau  DM, Shieh  WJ, Paddock  CD, Drew  C, Liu  L, et al. Molecular detection and typing of dengue viruses from archived tissues of fatal cases by rt-PCR and sequencing: diagnostic and epidemiologic implications. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:335–40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Callahan  JD, Wu  SJ, Dion-Schultz  A, Mangold  BE, Peruski  LF, Watts  DM, et al. Development and evaluation of serotype- and group-specific fluorogenic reverse transcriptase PCR (TaqMan) assays for dengue virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4119–24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lanciotti  RS, Kosoy  OL, Laven  JJ, Panella  AJ, Velez  JO, Lambert  AJ, et al. Chikungunya virus in US travelers returning from India, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:764–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakajima  N, Hata  S, Sato  Y, Tobiume  M, Katano  H, Kaneko  K, et al. The first autopsy case of pandemic influenza (A/H1N1pdm) virus infection in Japan: detection of a high copy number of the virus in type II alveolar epithelial cells by pathological and virological examination. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010;63:67–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang  F, Flanagan  J, Su  N, Wang  LC, Bui  S, Nielson  A, et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagn. 2012;14:22–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nowakowski  TJ, Pollen  AA, Di Lullo  E, Sandoval-Espinosa  C, Bershteyn  M, Kriegstein  AR. Expression analysis highlights AXL as a candidate Zika virus entry receptor in neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:591–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazar  M, Perelygina  L, Martines  R, Greer  P, Paddock  CD, Peltecu  G, et al. Immunolocalization and distribution of rubella antigen in fatal congenital rubella syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2015;3:86–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritter  JM, Martines  RB, Zaki  SR. Zika virus: pathology from the pandemic. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Oct 5 [Epub ahead of print].
  34. Halstead  SB. Antibody, macrophages, dengue virus infection, shock, and hemorrhage: a pathogenetic cascade. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11(Suppl 4):S830–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Winchester  SA, Varga  Z, Parmar  D, Brown  KE. Persistent intraocular rubella infection in a patient with Fuchs’ uveitis and congenital rubella syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1622–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Neill  JF. The ocular manifestations of congenital infection: a study of the early effect and long-term outcome of maternally transmitted rubella and toxoplasmosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;96:813–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Appler  KK, Brown  AN, Stewart  BS, Behr  MJ, Demarest  VL, Wong  SJ, et al. Persistence of West Nile virus in the central nervous system and periphery of mice. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10649. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bhatnagar  J, Guarner  J, Paddock  CD, Shieh  WJ, Lanciotti  RS, Marfin  AA, et al. Detection of West Nile virus in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human tissues by RT-PCR: a useful adjunct to conventional tissue-based diagnostic methods. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:106–11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Labadie  K, Larcher  T, Joubert  C, Mannioui  A, Delache  B, Brochard  P, et al. Chikungunya disease in nonhuman primates involves long-term viral persistence in macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:894–906. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliveira  DB, Almeida  FJ, Durigon  EL, Mendes  ÉA, Braconi  CT, Marchetti  I, et al. Prolonged shedding of Zika virus associated with congenital infection. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1202–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2303.161499

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 3—March 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Julu Bhatnagar, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop G32, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 17, 2017
Page updated: February 17, 2017
Page reviewed: February 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external