Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 1—January 2021
Research

Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Prospectively Pooled Specimens

Hannah Wang, Catherine A. Hogan, Jacob A. Miller, Malaya K. Sahoo, ChunHong Huang, Kenji O. Mfuh, Mamdouh Sibai, James Zehnder, Brendan Hickey, Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong, and Benjamin A. PinskyComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA (H. Wang, C.A. Hogan, J.A. Miller, M.K. Sahoo, C. Huang, J. Zehnder, N. Sinnott-Armstrong, B.A. Pinsky); Stanford Health Care, Stanford (K.O. Mfuh, M. Sibai, B.A. Pinsky); Stanford University, Stanford (N. Sinnott-Armstrong)

Main Article

Table 3

Results of 8-sample pooled testing, by testing platform and number of positive specimens per pool (n = 110) for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2*

Pool no.
Pooled testing
Individual testing
Total no. pools
LDT
Panther Fusion
Panther Aptima-M
Panther Aptima-350
Positive, 
(no. 1 PP, no. >1 PP)
Negative
1 + + + + 30 (21, 9) 0 30
2 + + + 2 (1, 1) 0 2
3 + + 0 (0, 0) 0 0
4 + + + 0 (0, 0) 0 0
5 + + 0 (0, 0) 0 0
6 + 1 (1, 0) 1† 2
7 + + + 2 (2, 0) 0 2
8 + + 1 (1, 0) 0 1
9 + 0 (0, 0) 1‡ 1
10 + + 2 (2, 0) 0 2
11 + 1 (1, 0) 2
12 7 (7, 0) 61 68
No. positive pools 34 36 34 39 46 (36, 10)
No. negative pools 76 74 76 71 64
Total no. pools 110 110 110 110 110

*Panther Aptima with manufacturer-set relative light unit cutoff. Panther Aptima-350, Panther Aptima with relative light unit cutoff value >350 was considered positive; Ct, cycle threshold; LDT, laboratory-developed test; Pos, positive; RLU, relative light unit; 1 PP, 1 positive specimen in pool; >1 PP, >2 positive specimens in pool; –, negative; +, positive.

†False-positive LDT Ct value was 37.5.

‡False-positive Panther Fusion Ct value was 38.8.

§False-positive Panther Aptima-350 RLU value was 434.

Main Article

Page created: September 29, 2020
Page updated: December 21, 2020
Page reviewed: December 21, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external