Volume 27, Number 5—May 2021
Research
Engineered NS1 for Sensitive, Specific Zika Virus Diagnosis from Patient Serology
Table 2
Phase | Sensitivity, % (95% CI) |
Specificity, % (95% CI) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELISA | Lateral flow |
ELISA | Lateral flow |
||||
F1 | F2 | F1 | F2 | ||||
Acute, 1–6 dpo | |||||||
IgM | 41.4 (29.8–53.8) | 51.4 (39.2–63.6) | 50.0 (37.8–62.2) | 100.0 (95.5–100.0) | 95.1 (87.8–98.6) | 97.5 (0.91–1.00) | |
IgG | 22.9 (13.7–34.4) | 44.3 (32.4–56.7) | 20.0 (11.4–31.3) | 98.8 (93.3–100.0) | 92.6 (84.6–97.2) | 98.8 (0.93–1.00) | |
IgM/IgG | 52.9 (40.6–64.9) | 68.6 (56.4–79.1) | 60.0 (47.6–71.5) | 98.8 (93.3–100.0) | 88.9 (80.0–94.8) | 96.3 (0.90–0.99) | |
NS1 | 41.4 (29.8–53.8) | NP | NP | 97.5 (91.4–99.7) | NP | NP | |
IgM/NS1 | 55.7 (43.3–67.6) | NP | NP | 97.5 (91.4–99.7) | NP | NP | |
IgG/NS1 | 61.4 (49.0–72.8) | NP | NP | 96.3 (89.6–99.2) | NP | NP | |
IgM/IgG/NS1 |
67.1 (54.9–77.9) |
NP |
NP |
96.3 (89.6–99.2) |
NP |
NP |
|
Convalescent, 7–21 dpo | |||||||
IgM | 79.2 (65.0–89.5) | 70.8 (55.9–83.0) | 70.8 (55.9–83.0) | 95.7 (88.0–99.1) | 87.1 (77.0–93.9) | 94.3 (86.0–98.4) | |
IgG | 83.3 (69.8–92.5) | 89.6 (77.3–96.5) | 79.2 (65.0–89.5) | 84.3 (73.6–91.9) | 78.6 (67.1–87.5) | 90.0 (80.5–95.9) | |
IgM/IgG | 89.6 (77.3–96.5) | 89.6 (77.3–96.5) | 87.5 (74.8–95.3) | 80 (68.7–88.6) | 68.6 (56.4–79.1) | 84.3 (73.6–91.9) |
*ELISA and IA assays were evaluated for the detection of NS1, IgM, and IgG with TTSH plasma samples (ZIKV: n = 70 with 1–6 dpo, and n = 48 with 7–16 dpo; DENV: n = 81 with 1–6 dpo, and n = 70 with 7–21 dpo. Sensitivity and specificity were determined with positive plasmas divided by the total number of respective ZIKV and DENV plasma samples. DENV, dengue virus; dpo, days postonset of symptoms; F1, capture format; F2, detector format; IA, immunochromatographic assay; NP, not performed (NS1 antigen test was not performed in the lateral flow formats because of low sensitivity); NS1, nonstructural protein 1; ZIKV, Zika virus.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: April 05, 2021
Page updated: April 20, 2021
Page reviewed: April 20, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.