Spread of Canine Influenza A(H3N2) Virus, United States
Ian E.H. Voorhees, Amy L. Glaser, Kathy L. Toohey-Kurth, Sandra Newbury, Benjamin D. Dalziel, Edward Dubovi, Keith Poulsen, Christian Leutenegger, Katriina J.E. Willgert, Laura Brisbane-Cohen, Jill Richardson-Lopez, Edward C. Holmes, and Colin R. Parrish
Author affiliations: Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA (I.E.H. Voorhees, A.L. Glaser, E.J. Dubovi, K.J.E. Willgert, L. Brisbane-Cohen, C.R. Parrish); University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (K. Toohey-Kurth, S. Newbury, K. Poulsen); Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA (B.D. Dalziel); IDEXX Laboratories, West Sacramento, California, USA (C. Leutenegger); Royal Veterinary College, London, UK (K.J.E. Willgert); Merck Animal Health, Madison, New Jersey, USA (J. Richardson-Lopez); University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (E.C. Holmes)
Main Article
Figure 1
Figure 1. Incidence of canine influenza A(H3N2) virus RNA–positive dogs in the Chicago, Illinois, area, USA, March 14–April 27, 2015. A) Weekly testing summary of samples collected within Illinois. B) Weekly testing summary of samples collected in all other states. C) Presence of virus in the Midwest region, by US postal code.
Main Article
Page created: November 16, 2017
Page updated: November 16, 2017
Page reviewed: November 16, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.