Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 1—January 2023
Research

Seroepidemiology and Carriage of Diphtheria in Epidemic-Prone Area and Implications for Vaccination Policy, Vietnam

Noriko KitamuraComments to Author , Thanh T. Hoan, Hung M. Do, The A. Dao, Lien T. Le, Thao T.T. Le, Thuy T.T. Doan, Thuong N. Chau, Hoi T. Dinh, Masaaki Iwaki, Mitsutoshi Senoh, Androulla Efstraciou, Nen M. Ho, Duc M. Pham, Duc-Anh Dang, Michiko Toizumi, Paul Fine, Hung T. Do, and Lay-Myint Yoshida
Author affiliations: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (N. Kitamura, P. Fine); Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan (N. Kitamura, M. Toizumi, L.-M. Yoshida); Pasteur Institute in Nha Trang, Nha Trang, Vietnam (T.T. Hoan, H.M. Do, T.A. Dao, L.T. Le, T.T.T. Le, T.T.T. Doan, H.T. Do); Quang Ngai Provincial Health Services, Quang Ngai, Vietnam (T.N. Chau, H.T. Dinh, N.M. Ho, D.M. Pham); National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan (M. Iwaki, M. Senoh); National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam (D.-A. Dang); UK Health Security Agency, London (A. Efstraciou)

Main Article

Figure 3

Comparison of the age-stratified seroprevalence, the proportion of persons who had diphtheria toxoid antibody >0.1 IU/mL, between Quang Ngai Province and Nha Trang City (15), Vietnam. Seroprevalence of Quang Ngai was not weighted by population for this comparison. Nha Trang is a well-vaccinated community that has had no reported diphtheria cases since 2013. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Figure 3. Comparison of the age-stratified seroprevalence, the proportion of persons who had diphtheria toxoid antibody >0.1 IU/mL, between Quang Ngai Province and Nha Trang City (15), Vietnam. Seroprevalence of Quang Ngai was not weighted by population for this comparison. Nha Trang is a well-vaccinated community that has had no reported diphtheria cases since 2013. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Main Article

Page created: November 01, 2022
Page updated: December 21, 2022
Page reviewed: December 21, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external