Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Supplement –Summer 2026

SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Supplement

Evaluation of Detection Methods for Wastewater Surveillance of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria from Healthcare Facilities

Ean Warren, James VanDerslice, L. Scott Benson, William J. Brazelton, Windy Tanner, Amanda K. Lyons, Florence Whitehill, Angela Coulliette-Salmond, Sydney Fusco, and Jennifer WeidhaasComments to Author 
Author affiliation: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (E. Warren, J. VanDerslice, L.S. Benson, W.J. Brazelton, W. Tanner, S. Fusco, J. Weidhaas); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (F. Whitehill, A. Coulliette-Salmond); US Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA (A. Coulliette-Salmond)

Main Article

Figure 1

Measured Ct (mean +SD), calculated log GC/mL, and extrapolated log CFU/mL for detection limit studies in study of detection methods for wastewater surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria from healthcare facilities. A) blaNDM; B) blaIMP; C) blaVIM. Each point represents 5 replicates. Horizontal line represents a Ct cutoff of 35 cycles. All data points were included in the linear regression for each plot; dashed lines represent 95% CIs of the regression. The log CFU/mL was extrapolated from the initial isolate concentration, which was then serially diluted by 6 log into each of 5 replicates. The log GC/mL was estimated from the Ct response from standard curves using either geneblock DNA or antimicrobial-resistant isolates as positive controls. Ct, cycle threshold; GC, gene copies

Figure 1. Measured Ct (mean +SD), calculated log GC/mL, and extrapolated log CFU/mL for detection limit studies in study of detection methods for wastewater surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria from healthcare facilities. A) blaNDM; B) blaIMP; C) blaVIM. Each point represents 5 replicates. Horizontal line represents a Ct cutoff of 35 cycles. All data points were included in the linear regression for each plot; dashed lines represent 95% CIs of the regression. The log CFU/mL was extrapolated from the initial isolate concentration, which was then serially diluted by 6 log into each of 5 replicates. The log GC/mL was estimated from the Ct response from standard curves using either geneblock DNA or antimicrobial-resistant isolates as positive controls. Ct, cycle threshold; GC, gene copies

Main Article

Page created: May 26, 2026
Page updated: July 31, 2026
Page reviewed: July 31, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external