Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 32, Supplement –Summer 2026

SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Supplement

Evaluation of Detection Methods for Wastewater Surveillance of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria from Healthcare Facilities

Ean Warren, James VanDerslice, L. Scott Benson, William J. Brazelton, Windy Tanner, Amanda K. Lyons, Florence Whitehill, Angela Coulliette-Salmond, Sydney Fusco, and Jennifer WeidhaasComments to Author 
Author affiliation: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (E. Warren, J. VanDerslice, L.S. Benson, W.J. Brazelton, W. Tanner, S. Fusco, J. Weidhaas); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (F. Whitehill, A. Coulliette-Salmond); US Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA (A. Coulliette-Salmond)

Main Article

Table 3

Limits of detection for isolates diluted in wastewater and detected by qPCR and culture-based methods and for qPCR-positive controls diluted in 1X PBS in study of detection methods for wastewater surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria from healthcare facilities*

Antimicrobial-resistant gene Observed GC/mL wastewater, mean +SD Extrapolated culture detection limit, CFU/mL wastewater
Observed qPCR positive control detection limit, GC/μL qPCR reaction§
Independent estimate, mean +SD† Combined estimate, limit (95% CI)‡
blaKPC Not estimable Not estimable 32
blaOXA-48-like Not estimable Not estimable 34
blaVIM 146 +92¶ 38 +41 26 (2.9–865) 241
blaNDM 284 +154 25 +24 17 (2.2–1,592) 390
blaIMP 5,486 +3,137 337 +341 216 (4.2–1,5437) 2200

*Not estimable indicates wastewater contained blaKPC and blaOXA-48-like genes. GC, gene copies; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; qPCR, quantitative PCR. †The culture detection limit for each of 3 trials was estimated independently based on linear regressions and a cycle threshold (Ct) cutoff of 35; then, the mean and SD of those detection limits was estimated. ‡The detection limit for all 3 trials combined was estimated from the linear regression. §Estimated from qPCR standard curves. ¶Analysis of variance or analysis of variance on ranks was used to determine for each trial the mean Ct value for the lowest dilution that was above a Ct of 35 and at a significantly different concentration than the next lowest dilution. The qPCR standard curve calculation was then used for this Ct to estimate the GC/mL. Mean and SD GC/mL for the 3 trials was then estimated.

Main Article

Page created: May 26, 2026
Page updated: July 31, 2026
Page reviewed: July 31, 2026
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external